Abstract
The aim of this paper is to demonstrate that, contrary to a commonly held view, it is possible to teach the European Union (EU) in a way that makes students enthusiastic about the subject. The paper is informed by my experience of leading a EU simulation module, based on a modified problem-based learning (PBL) approach. The idea is to share my experience and prompt a debate on (1) how the EU can be taught in exciting ways for students, and (2) how an adapted PBL approach in the form of a simulation can significantly help to deepen students’ interest in the EU as a subject.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The first five steps constitute the ‘preliminary discussion phase’.
The module was initially developed by Thomas Christiansen, now at the European Institute for Public Administration in Maastricht.
References
Beach, D. (2005) The Dynamics of European Integration – Why and When EU Institutions Matter, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Biggs, J. and Tang, C. (2007) Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, 3rd edn., Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
Boud, D. (1985) Problem-based Learning in Education for the Professions, Sydney: Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia.
Engel, C.E. (1991) ‘Not Just a Method But a Way of Learning’, in D. Boud and G. Feletti (eds.) The Challenge of Problem Based Learning, London: Kogan Page, pp. 23–33.
Farage, N. (2004) ‘Speech in the European Parliament on the Election of the President of the Commission Barroso’, (11th October), http://www.ukip.org/abc_news/gen12.php?t=1&id=928.
Hounsell, D. (2000) ‘The Evaluation of Teaching’, in H. Frey, S. Ketteridge and S. Marshall (eds.) A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, London: Kogan Page, pp. 161–174.
Kaunert, C. (2007) ‘“Without the Power of Purse or Sword”: The European arrest warrant and the role of the Commission’, Journal of European Integration 29 (4): 387–404.
Knight, P. (2002) Being a Teacher in Higher Education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
McKeachie, W.J. and Svinicki, M. (2006) McKeachie's Teaching Tips – Strategies, Research, and Theory for College and University Teachers, Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Moravcsik, A. (1999) ‘A new statecraft? Supranational entrepreneurs and international cooperation’, International Organization 53 (2): 267–306.
Peterson, J. and Shackleton, M. (eds.) (2002) The Institutions of the European Union, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pollack, M.A. (2003) The Engines of European Integration, Clarendon: Oxford University Press.
Stone Sweet, A. and Sandholtz, W. (1997) ‘European integration and supranational governance’, Journal of European Public Policy 4 (3): 297–317.
Stone Sweet, A., Sandholtz, W. and Fligstein, N. (2001) The Institutionalization of Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Til, C. and van der Heijden, F. (s.d.) PBL Study Skills – An overview, Maastricht: Educational Department and Research, Universiteit Maastricht.
Wallace, H., Wallace, W. and Pollack, M.A. (eds.) (2005) Policy-Making in the European Union, 5th edn Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Acknowledgements
I would like to express my gratitude to Sarah Leonard for inspiring me to write this paper and for providing the crucial discussions and support, as well as to Jim Newell and Alaric Searle for encouraging me to complete it.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaunert, C. The European Union Simulation: From Problem-Based Learning (PBL) to Student Interest. Eur Polit Sci 8, 254–265 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2009.8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2009.8