Skip to main content
Log in

The Mine Ban Treaty, New Diplomacy and Human Security Ten Years Later

  • Review
  • Published:
European Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Alcalde, J. (2009) ‘The Control Arms Campaign. A Case Study for the NGO Impact on International Relations After the Cold War’, in K. Fahlenbrach, M. Klimke and J. Scharloth (eds.) The ‘Establishment’ Responds – Power and Protest During and After the Cold War, New York/Oxford: Berghahn Books, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcalde, J. and Bouchard, C. (2008) ‘Human security and coherence within the EU: the case of small arms and light weapons’, Hamburg Review on Social Sciences. Special issue on Revisiting Coherence in the Common Foreign and Security Policy 3 (1): 142–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arts, B., Noortmann, M. and Reinalda, B. (eds.) (2001) Non-State Actors in International Relations, Ashgate: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. and Keohane, R.O. (1986) ‘Achieving Cooperation Under Anarchy’, in K.A. Oye (ed.) Cooperation Under Anarchy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 226–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axworthy, L. (1997) ‘Canada and human security: the need for leadership’, International Journal 52: 183–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behringer, R.M. (2005) ‘Middle power leadership on the human security agenda’, Cooperation and Conflict 40 (3): 305–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrie, J. and Martin Randin, V. (eds.) (2004) Alternative Approaches in Multilateral Decision Making: Disarmament as Humanitarian Action, Geneva: UNIDIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrie, J. and Martin Randin, V. (eds.) (2005) Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: From Perspective to Practice, Geneva: UNIDIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrie, J. and Martin Randin, V. (eds.) (2006) Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, Geneva: UNIDIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, M.A., Lawson, R.J. and Tomlin, B.W. (eds.) (1998) To Walk Without Fear. The Global Movement to Ban Landmines, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, R. (2006) ‘Disarmament as Humanitarian Action? Comparing Negotiations on Anti-personnel Mines and Explosive Remnants of War’, in J. Borrie and V. Martin Randin (eds.) Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Disarmament and Arms Control Negotiations, Geneva: UNIDIR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelista, M. (1999) Unarmed Forces. The Transnational Movement to End the Cold War, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) ‘International norm dynamics and political change’, International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florini, A.M. (ed.) (2000) The Third Force. The Rise of Transnational Civil Society, Tokyo and Washington: JCIE and CEIP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubert, D. (2000) ‘The landmine ban: a case study in humanitarian advocacy’, Occasional Paper no. 42, Providence, RI: Thomas J. Watson Jr Institute for International Studies.

  • International Campaign to Ban Landmines. (2004) Landmine Monitor Report 2004: Toward a Mine-Free World, Ottawa: Mines Action Canada, available at www.icbl.org/lm/2004/.

  • Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khagram, S.J., Riker, V. and Sikkink, K. (eds.) (2002) Restructuring World Politics: Transnational Movements and Norms, Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelmann, E. (1990) ‘Global prohibition regimes: the evolution of norms in international society’, International Organization 44 (4): 479–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2001) ‘Human security: paradigm shift or hot air’, International Security 26 (2): 87–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrova, M.H. (2007) Leadership Competition and the Creation of Norms: A Crossnational Study of Weapons Restrictions. Dissertation presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.

  • Price, R. (1998) ‘Reversing the gun sights: transnational civil society targets landmines’, International Organization 52 (3): 613–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, R. (2003) ‘Transnational civil society and advocacy in world politics’, World Politics 55: 579–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.A. and Benford, R. (1988) ‘Ideology, frame resonance and participant mobilization’, International Social Movement Research 1: 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Program for Development. (1994) Report on Human Development 1994, New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press, available at http://hdr.undp.org/en/reports/global/hdr1994/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Villacampa, J. The Mine Ban Treaty, New Diplomacy and Human Security Ten Years Later. Eur Polit Sci 7, 519–529 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.30

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2008.30

Navigation