Advertisement

European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 465–491 | Cite as

Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement

  • Jennifer E Gerow
  • Jason Bennett Thatcher
  • Varun Grover
Empirical Research

Abstract

Top management has been concerned with IT-business strategic alignment (hereafter referred to as alignment) for the past 30 years. Consequently, alignment researchers have developed many models to explain how alignment generates value for firms. However, these models use inconsistent definitions and measures of alignment, which has led to conflicting results and has potentially inhibited the progress of research on this critical topic. This paper emphasizes the importance of demarcating the six alignment types that are sometimes confused in the literature into a single, unified model. It also reports on the development of definitions and measures of these six types of alignment including alignment between IT and business strategies (i.e., intellectual alignment), between IT and business infrastructures and processes (i.e., operational alignment), and across these two domains such that strategies are linked with infrastructures and processes (i.e., four types of cross-domain alignment). Analyzing survey data collected from 140 Chief Information Officers, we found each measure possesses desirable psychometric properties. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Keywords

alignment IT-business strategic alignment intellectual operational cross-domain 

References

  1. Anderson JC and Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin 103 (3), 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong CP and Sambamurthy V (1999) Information technology assimilation in firms: the influence of senior leadership and it infrastructures. Information Systems Research 10 (4), 304–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avison D, Jones B, Powell P and Wilson DB (2004) Using and validating the strategic alignment model. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 13 (3), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baets WRJ (1996) Some empirical evidence on IS strategy alignment in banking. Information & Management 30 (4), 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baker J, Jones DR, Cao Q and song J (2011) Conceptualizing the dynamic strategic alignment competency. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12 (4), 299–322.Google Scholar
  6. Banker RD, Hu N, Pavlou PA and Luftman J (2011) CIO reporting structure, strategic positioning, and firm performance. MIS Quarterly 35 (2), 487–504.Google Scholar
  7. Barua A, Konana P, Whinston AB and Yin F (2004) An empirical investigation of net-enabled business value. MIS Quarterly 28 (4), 585–620.Google Scholar
  8. Benbya H and McKelvey B (2006) Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve is alignment: a multi-level approach. Journal of Information Technology 21 (4), 284–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bergeron F, Raymond L and Rivard S (2001) Fit in strategic information technology management research: an empirical comparison of perspectives. OMEGA International Journal of Management Science 29 (2), 125–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bergeron F, Raymond L and Rivard S (2004) Ideal patterns of strategic alignment and business performance. Information & Management 41 (8), 1003–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bicocchi F (2013) Should a CIO be proactive and suguest IT systems or applications to meet a business need or should a CIO wait for the business to come to him? CIO Network. [WWW document] http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Should-CIO-be-proactive-suguest-51825.S.218599232?view (accessed 13 March 2013).
  12. Broadbent M and Weill P (1993) Improving business and information strategy alignment: learning from the banking industry. IBM Systems Journal 32 (1), 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Broadbent M, Weill P and Neo BS (1999) Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 8 (2), 157–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brown CV (1999) Horizontal mechanisms under differing is organization contexts. MIS Quarterly 23 (3), 421–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Byrd TA, Lewis BR and Bryan RW (2006) The leveraging influence of strategic alignment on it investment: an empirical examination. Information & Management 43 (3), 308–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Carter M, Grover V and Thatcher JB (2011) The emerging CIO role of business technology strategist. MIS Quarterly Executive 10 (1), 19–29.Google Scholar
  17. Celuch K, Murphy GB and Callaway SK (2007) More bang for your buck: small firms and the importance of aligned information technology capabilities and strategic flexibility. Journal of High Technology Management Research 17 (2), 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chan YE, Huff SL, Barclay DW and Copeland DG (1997) Business strategic orientation, information systems strategic orientation, and strategic alignment. Information Systems Research 8 (2), 125–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chan YE and Reich BH (2007) IT alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information Technology 22 (4), 297–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chan YE, Sabherwal R and Thatcher JB (2006) Antecedents and outcomes of strategic IS alignment: an empirical investigation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53 (1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chang HL, Wang K and Chiu I (2008) Business-IT fit in e-procurement systems: evidence from high-technology firms in China. Information Systems Journal 18 (4), 381–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen L (2010) Business-IT alignment maturity of companies in China. Information & Management 47 (1), 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen DQ, Mocker M, Preston DS and Teubner A (2010) Information systems strategy: reconceptualization, measurement, and implications. MIS Quarterly 34 (2), 233–259.Google Scholar
  24. Chin WW (1998) Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 22 (1), vii–xvi.Google Scholar
  25. Chin WW and Frye T (1996) Pls Graph. University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.Google Scholar
  26. Chin WW, Thatcher JB and Wright RT (2012) Assessing common method bias: problems with the ULMC technique. MIS Quarterly 36 (3), 1003–1019.Google Scholar
  27. Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing 16 (1), 64–73.Google Scholar
  28. Cooper BL, Watson HJ, Wixom BH and Goodhue DL (2000) Data warehousing supports corporate strategy at first American cooperation. MIS Quarterly 24 (4), 547–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Cragg P, King M and Hussin H (2002) IT alignment and firm performance in small manufacturing firms. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 11 (2), 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cragg P, Tagliavini M and Mills A (2007) Evaluating the alignment of IT with business processes in SMEs. Australasian (ACIS) (AIS, Ed), pp 38–48, AIS, Toowoomba.Google Scholar
  31. Cronbach LJ and Shavelson RJ (2004) My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement 64 (3), 391–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Croteau AM and Raymond L (2004) Performance outcomes of strategic and IT competencies alignment. Journal of Information Technology 19 (3), 178–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Cumps B et al (2009) Inferring comprehensible business/ICT alignment rules. Information & Management 46 (2), 116–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Deming WE (1986) Out of the Crisis. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  36. Dennis AR, Wixom BH and Vandenberg RJ (2001) Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. MIS Quarterly 25 (2), 167–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dong L, Neufeld D and Higgins C (2009) Top management support of enterprise systems implementations. Journal of Information Technology 24 (1), 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT, Maccallum RC and Strahan EJ (1999) Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 4 (3), 272–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Guillemette MG and Pare G (2012) Toward a new theory of the contribution of the IT function in organizations. MIS Quarterly 36 (2), 529–551.Google Scholar
  40. Gupta YP, Karimi J and Somers TM (1997) Alignment of a firm’s competitive strategy and information technology management sophistication: the missing link. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44 (4), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Harman HH (1976) Modern Factor Analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  42. Heim GR and Peng DX (2010) The impact of information technology use on plant structure, practices, and performance: an exploratory study. Journal of Operations Management 28 (2), 144–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Henderson JC and Sifonis JG (1988) The value of strategic IS planning: understanding consistency, validity, and IS markets. MIS Quarterly 12 (2), 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Henderson J and Venkatraman N (1993) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 32 (1), 4–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Henderson JC and Venkatraman H (1999) Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal 38 (2/3), 472–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hitt LM and Brynjolfsson E (1996) Productivity, business profitability, and consumer surplus: three different measures of information technology value. MIS Quarterly 20 (2), 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hong K-K and Kim Y-G (2002) The critical success factors for ERP implementation: an organizational fit perspective. Information and Management 40 (1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hu Q and Huang CD (2006) Using the balanced scorecard to achieve sustained IT-business alignment: a case study. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 17 (Article 8), 2–45.Google Scholar
  49. Huang LK (2009) The contingent role of innovation between IT management sophistication and strategic alignment. Journal of Global Information Management 17 (2), 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Huang CD and Hu Q (2007) Achieving IT-business strategic alignment via enterprise-wide implementation of balanced scorecards. Information Systems Management 24 (2), 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huang J and Lin C (2006) Empower internet services in hotel industry – a customer service life cycle concept. The Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge 9 (1), 99–103.Google Scholar
  52. Hung RYY, Yang B, Lien BYH, Mclean GN and YM Kuo (2010) Dynamic capability: impact of process alignment and organizational learning culture on performance. Journal of World Business 45 (3), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Jobe JB (2003) Cognitive psychology and self-reports: models and methods. Quality of Life Research 12 (3), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Johnson AM and Lederer AL (2010) CEO/CIO mutual understanding, strategic alignment, and the contribution of IS to the organization. Information & Management 47 (3), 138–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jordan E and Tricker B (1995) Information strategy: alignment with organization structure. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 4 (4), 357–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Joshi K (1989) The measurement or fairness of equity perceptions of management. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kang S, Park JH and Yang HD (2008) ERP alignment for positive business performance: evidence from Korea’s ERP market. Journal of Computer Information Systems 48 (4), 25–38.Google Scholar
  58. Karabenick SA et al (2007) Cognitive processing of self-report items in educational research: do they think what we mean? Educational Psychologist 42 (3), 139–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Karimi J, Bhattacherjee A, Gupta YP and Somers TM (2000) The effects of MIS steering committees on information technology management sophistication. Journal of Management Information Systems 17 (2), 207–230.Google Scholar
  60. Karimi J and Konsynski BR (1991) Globalization and information management strategies. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (4), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kearns GS (2005) An electronic commerce strategic typology: insights from case studies. Information & Management 42 (7), 1023–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kearns GS and Lederer AL (2003) A resource-based view of strategic IT alignment: how knowledge sharing creates competitive advantage. Decision Sciences 34 (1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kearns GS and Lederer AL (2004) The impact of industry contextual factors on IT focus and the use of IT for competitive advantage. Information & Management 41 (7), 899–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kearns GS and Sabherwal R (2006) Strategic alignment between business and information technology: a knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (3), 129–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Kefi H and Alexandre-Leclair L (2009) IT organizational alignment: mechanistic versus organic patterns and performance. In Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (AIS, Ed), pp 1–11, AIS, Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
  66. Khaiata M and Zualkernan IA (2009) A simple instrument to measure IT-business alignment maturity. Information Systems Management 26 (2), 138–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. King WR (1978) Strategic planning for management information systems. MIS Quarterly 2 (1), 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Kunnathur AS and Shi Z (2001) An investigation of the strategic information systems planning success in Chinese publicly traded firms. International Journal of Information Management 21 (6), 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Lai JM, Lee GG and Hsu WL (2009) The influence of partner’s trust-commitment relationship on electronic commerce strategic planning. Management Decision 47 (3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lee S and Leifer RP (1992) A framework for linking the structure of information systems with organizational requirements for information sharing. Journal of Management Information Systems 8 (4), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lee SM, Kim K, Paulson P and Park H (2008) Developing a socio-technical framework for business-IT alignment. Industrial Management & Data Systems 108 (9), 1167–1181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lee H, Yu J and Kim H (2004) An empirical study on the integrated performance model for the effect of information technology investment. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) (AIS, Ed), pp 391–402, AIS, Shanghai.Google Scholar
  73. Lewin AY and Volberda HW (1999) Prolegomena on coevolution: a framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms. Organization Science 10 (5), 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lewis BR, Templeton GF and Byrd TA (2005) A methodology for construct development in MIS research. European Journal of Information Systems 14 (4), 388–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Li Y, Tan CH, Teo HH and Tan BCY (2006) Innovative usage of information technology in Singapore organizations: do CIO characteristics make a difference? IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53 (2), 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Lindell M and Whitney D (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology 86 (1), 114–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ling H, Zhao F and Wang Y (2009) Impact of synergy between IT and business process on organizational performance: a perspective of ambidexterity theory. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (AIS, Ed), AIS, pp 1–13, AIS, Hyderabad, India.Google Scholar
  78. Little TD, Lindenberger U and Nesselroade JR (1999) On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: when ‘good’ indicators are bad and ‘bad’ indicators are good. Psychological Methods 4 (2), 192–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Luftman J (2000) Assessing business-IT alignment maturity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4 (Article 14), 1–50.Google Scholar
  80. Luftman J and Ben-Zvi T (2010) Key issues for IT executives 2009: difficult economy’s impact on IT. MIS Quarterly Executive 9 (1), 49–59.Google Scholar
  81. Luftman J and Ben-Zvi T (2011) Key issues for IT executives 2011: cautious optimism in uncertain economic times. MIS Quarterly Executive 10 (4), 203–212.Google Scholar
  82. Luftman J and Brier T (1999) Achieving and sustaining business-IT alignment. California Management Review 42 (1), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Luftman J, Dorociak J, Kempaiah R and Rigoni EH (2008) Strategic alignment maturity: a structural equation model validation. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) (AIS, Ed), pp 1–16, AIS, Toronto, ON, Canada.Google Scholar
  84. Luftman J, Lewis PR and Oldach SH (1993) Transforming the enterprise: the alignment of business and information technology strategies. IBM Systems Journal 32 (1), 198–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff PM and Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly 35 (2), 293–334.Google Scholar
  86. Main TJ and Short JE (1989) Managing the merger: building partnership through IT planning at the new Baxter. MIS Quarterly 13 (4), 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Malhotra NK, Kim SS and Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Management Science 52 (12), 1865–1883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. McKendrick J (2011) Finance executives, not CIOs, have final word on IT: Gartner survey. [WWW document] http://www.zdnet.com/blog/service-oriented/finance-executives-not-cios-have-final-word-on-it-gartner-survey/7338 (accessed 2 August 2011).
  89. McKnight DH, Choudhury V and Kacmar C (2002) Developing and validating trust measures for E-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research 13 (3), 334–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. McLaren TS, Head MM, Yuan Y and Chan YE (2011) A multilevel model for measuring fit between a firm’s competitive srategies and information systems capabilities. MIS Quarterly 35 (4), 909–929.Google Scholar
  91. Miles RE and Snow CC (1978) Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  92. Mintzberg H (1994) The fall and rise of strategic planning. Harvard Business Review 72 (1), 107–114.Google Scholar
  93. Moore GC and Benbasat I (1991) Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research 2 (3), 192–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Nadler D and Tushman M (1983) A general diagnostic model for organizational behavior: applying a congruence perspective. In Perspectives on Behavior in Organizations (Hackman JR, Lawler EE and Porter LW, Eds), pp 112–124, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  95. Nituch J (2012) Aligning IT with business needs. Fortress Technology. [WWW document] http://ftpinc.ca/blog/bid/129023/Aligning-IT-with-Business-Needs (accessed 27 September 2012).
  96. Noar SM (2003) The role of structural equation modeling in scale development. Structural Equation Modeling 10 (4), 622–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Nunnally JC (1967) Psychometric Theory. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  98. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  99. Nunnally JC and Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, Inc, New York.Google Scholar
  100. Oh W and Pinsonneault A (2007) On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly 31 (2), 239–265.Google Scholar
  101. Ozcan N (2012) Outsourcing IT and aligning processes. ITP. [WWW document] http://www.itpreport.com/default.asp?Mode=Show&A=2881&R=GL&goback=.gmp_51825.gna_51825 (accessed 27 September 2012).
  102. Palmer JW and Markus ML (2000) The performance impacts of quick response and strategic alignment in specialty retailing. Information Systems Research 11 (3), 241–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Peppard J and Breu K (2003) Beyond alignment: a coevolutionary view of the information systems strategy process. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (AIS, Ed), pp 743–750, AIS, Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  104. Petter S, Straub D and Rai A (2007) Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Quarterly 31 (4), 623–656.Google Scholar
  105. Piccoli G and Ives B (2005) Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly 29 (4), 747–776.Google Scholar
  106. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J-Y and Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Porra J, Hirschheim R and Parks MS (2005) The history of Texaco’s corporate information technology function: a general systems theoretical interpretation. MIS Quarterly 29 (4), 721–746.Google Scholar
  108. Porter CE and Donthu N (2008) Cultivating trust and harvesting value in virtual communities. Management Science 54 (1), 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Powell TC (1992) Organizational alignment as competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal 13 (2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Preston DS and Karahanna E (2009) Antecedents of IS strategic alignment: a nomological network. Information Systems Research 20 (2), 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Preston DS, Karahanna E and Rowe F (2006) Development of shared understanding between the chief information officer and top management team in U.S. and French organizations: a cross-cultural comparison. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53 (2), 191–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Pyburn PJ (1983) Linking the MIS plan with corporate strategy: an exploratory study. MIS Quarterly 7 (2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Ravishankar MN, Pan SL and Leidner DE (2011) Examining the strategic alignment and implementation success of a KMS: a subculture-based multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research 22 (1), 39–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Raymond L and Bergeron F (2008) Enabling the business strategy of SMEs through e-business capabilities: a strategic alignment perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems 108 (5), 577–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Raymond L and Croteau AM (2006) Enabling the strategic development of SMEs through advanced manufacturing systems: a configurational perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems 106 (7), 1012–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Reich BH and Benbasat I (1996) Measuring the linkage between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly 20 (1), 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Reich BH and Benbasat I (2000) Factors that influence the social dimension of alignment between business and information technology objectives. MIS Quarterly 24 (1), 81–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Ringle CM, Wende S and Will A (2005) Smartpls 2.0 (beta). SmartPLS, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  119. Rivard S, Raymond L and Verreault D (2006) Resource-based view and competitive strategy: an integrated model of the contribution of information technology to firm performance. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15 (1), 29–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Roepke R, Agarwal R and Ferratt TW (2000) Aligning the IT human resource with business vision: the leadership initiative at 3M. MIS Quarterly 24 (2), 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Sabherwal R, Hirschheim R and Goles T (2001) The dynamics of alignment: insights from a punctuated equilibrium model. Organization Science 12 (2), 179–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Sabherwal R and Kirs P (1994) The alignment between organizational critical success factors and information technology capability in academic institutions. Decision Sciences 25 (2), 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sanchez Ortiz A (2003) Testing a model of the relationships among organizational performance, IT-business alignment, and IT governance, University of North Texas, p 212.Google Scholar
  124. Schwarz A, Kalika M, Kefi H and Schwarz C (2010) A dynamic capabilities approach to understanding the impact of IT-enabled businesses processes and IT-business alignment on the strategic and operational performance of the firm. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 26 (Article 4), 57–84.Google Scholar
  125. Segars AH and Grover V (1998) Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement. MIS Quarterly 22 (2), 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Shah H (2012) As CIO, what is the #1 challenge that keeps you worried all the time. CIO Network, LinkedIn. [WWW document] http://www.linkedin.com/groups/As-CIO-what-is-1-51825.S.154128732?trk=group_search_item_list-0-b-ttl&goback=.gmp_51825.gna_51825 (accessed 27 September 2012).
  127. Sobel MD (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology 13 (1), 290–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Straub D, Boudreau M-C and Gefen D (2004) Validation guidelines for IS positivist research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 13 (24), 380–427.Google Scholar
  129. Sun H (2012) Understanding user revisions when using information systems features: adaptive system use and triggers. MIS Quarterly 36 (2), 453–478.Google Scholar
  130. Taipala DJ (2008) Information technology outsourcing: a study of its role in strategic alignment and the mitigating effect of virtual organization. Dissertation, Capella University, pp 1–195.Google Scholar
  131. Tallon PP (2003) The alignment paradox. CIO Insight. [WWW document] http://www.cioinsight.com/c/a/Past-News/Paul-Tallon-The-Alignment-Paradox/ (accessed 23 February 2010).
  132. Tallon PP (2007a) Does IT pay to focus? An analysis of IT business value under single and multi-focused business strategies. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 16 (3), 278–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Tallon PP (2007b) A process-oriented perspective on the alignment of information technology and business strategy. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (3), 227–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tallon PP, Kraemer KL and Gurbaxani V (2000) Executives’ perceptions of the business value of information technology: a process-oriented approach. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (4), 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Tan FB and Gallupe RB (2006) Aligning business and information systems thinking: a cognitive approach. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 53 (2), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Teece DJ, Pisano G and Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. Teo TSH and King WR (1996) Assessing the impact of integrating business planning and IS planning. Information & Management 30 (6), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Teo TSH and King WR (1997) Integration between business planning and information systems planning: an evolutionary-contingency perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 14 (1), 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Teo HH, Wei KK and Benbasat I (2003) Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: an institutional perspective. MIS Quarterly 27 (1), 19–50.Google Scholar
  140. Thrasher EH, Byrd TA and Hall D (2006) Information systems and healthcare XV: strategic fit in healthcare integrated delivery systems: an empirical investigation. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 18 (Article 34), 692–709.Google Scholar
  141. Tiwana A and Konsynski B (2010) Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research 21 (2), 288–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. van der Zee JTM and de Jong B (1999) Alignment is not enough: integrating business and information technology management with the balanced business scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems 16 (2), 137–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. van Geel B (2011) Who’s to blame for troubled projects..., revisited: what is the role of the architect in failing projects? LinkedIn: CIO Network. [WWW document] http://www.linkedin.com/groups/Whos-blame-troubled-projects-revisited-51825.S.45429937?trk=group_search_item_list-0-b-ttl&goback=.gna_51825 (accessed 8 April 2011).
  144. Venkatraman N (1985) Strategic Orientation of Business Enterprises: The Construct and Its Measurement. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.Google Scholar
  145. Wijnhoven F, Spil T, Stegwee R and Fa RTA (2006) Post-merger IT integration strategies: an IT alignment perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems 15 (1), 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. Yayla AA (2008) Antecedents of IT-business strategic alignment and the moderating roles of goal commitment and environmental uncertainty. The Barry Kaye College of Business, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, p 174.Google Scholar
  147. Yayla AA and Hu Q (2009) Antecedents and drivers of IT-business strategic alignment: empirical validation of a theoretical model. European Conference on Information Systems, pp 1–13.Google Scholar
  148. Zhang N, Yan Yu A and Dong X (2011) A coevolutionary journey of strategic knowledge management alignment: a Chinese case. In International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) (AIS, Ed), pp 1–19, AIS, Shanghai, China.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer E Gerow
    • 1
  • Jason Bennett Thatcher
    • 2
  • Varun Grover
    • 2
  1. 1.Economics & Business DepartmentVirginia Military InstituteU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of ManagementClemson UniversityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations