Advertisement

European Journal of Information Systems

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 337–359 | Cite as

An espoused cultural perspective to understand continued intention to use mobile applications: a four-country study of mobile social media application usability

  • Hartmut HoehleEmail author
  • Xiaojun Zhang
  • Viswanath Venkatesh
Empirical Research

Abstract

As most mobile applications are tailored for worldwide consumption, it is a significant challenge to develop applications that satisfy individuals with various cultural backgrounds. To address this issue, we drew on a recently developed conceptualization and associated instrument of mobile application usability to develop a model examining the impact of mobile social media application usability on continued intention to use. Drawing on Hofstede’s five cultural values, we incorporated espoused cultural values of masculinity/femininity, individualism/collectivism, power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and long-term orientation into our model as moderators. To test the model, we collected data from 1,844 consumers in four countries – the U.S., Germany, China, and India – who use mobile social media applications on their smartphones. The results provided support for the role of espoused national cultural values in moderating the impact of mobile social media application usability on continued intention to use and the model, with espoused cultural values explaining significantly more variance in continued intention to use (i.e., 38%) than the main effects-only model (i.e., 19%). Interestingly, our results demonstrated that culture at the national level did not play a significant role in affecting the relationship between usability constructs and continued intention to use, thus underscoring the importance of espoused culture.

Keywords

culture espoused national culture mobile social media applications continued intention to use 

References

  1. Adipat B, Zhang D and Zhou L (2011) The effect of tree-view based presentation adaptation on mobile web-browsing. MIS Quarterly 35 (1), 99–121.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal R and Venkatesh V (2002) Assessing a firm’s web presence: a heuristic evaluation procedure for the measurement of usability. Information Systems Research 13 (2), 168–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aiken LS and West SG (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Sage, London.Google Scholar
  4. Alvesson M and Kärreman D (2007) Constructing mystery: empirical matters in theory development. Academy of Management Review 32 (4), 1265–1281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Apple (2011) iOS developer library: user experience guidelines. [WWW document] https://developer.apple.com/library/ios/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/ (accessed 2 January 2015).
  6. Bem S (1981) The BSRI and gender schema theory: a reply to Spence and Heimrich. Psychological Bulletin 88 (4), 369–371.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacherjee A (2001) Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly 25 (3), 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boehringer M and Barnes S (2011) Testing a model of continued usage for micro-blogging services: the case of twitter. Journal of Computer Information Systems 51 (4), 1–10.Google Scholar
  9. Brislin RW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 1 (3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown SA, Dennis AR and Venkatesh V (2010) Predicting collaboration technology use: integrating technology adoption and collaboration research. Journal of Management Information Systems 27 (2), 9–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Campbell D, Wells JD and Valacich JS (2009) Understanding online customer relationships: B2C relationship stage theory. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction 1 (4), 108–132.Google Scholar
  12. Chin WW, Marcolin B and Newsted P (2003) A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research 14 (2), 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 16 (1), 64–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen J (1992) A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1), 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Culnan MJ, Mchugh PJ and Zubillaga JI (2010) How large US companies can use Twitter and other social media to gain business value. MIS Quarterly Executive 35 (1), 99–121.Google Scholar
  16. Cyr D, Head M, Larios H and Pan B (2009) Exploring human images in website design: a multi-method approach. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 539–566.Google Scholar
  17. Dawson JF and Richter AW (2006) Probing three-way interactions in moderated multiple regression: development and application of a slope difference test. Journal of Applied Psychology 91 (4), 917–926.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deloitte Research (2012) So many apps: so little to download. [WWW document] http://www.deloitte.com/assets/Dcom-Global/Local%20Content/Articles/TMT/TMT%20Predictions%202012/16470A%20So%20many%20apps%20lb1.pdf (accessed 2 January 2015).
  19. Dinev T and Hart P (2006) An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research 17 (1), 61–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dou W, Lim KH, Su C, Zhou N and Cui N (2010) Brand positioning strategy using search engine marketing. MIS Quarterly 34 (2), 261–279.Google Scholar
  21. Dudezert A and Leidner DE (2011) Illusions of control and social domination strategies in knowledge mapping system use. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (5), 574–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Earley PC and Stubblebine P (1989) Intercultural assessment of performance feedback. Group and Organization Studies 14 (2), 161–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Facebook (2013) Facebook: user statistics. [WWW document] http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics (accessed 10 July 2013).Google Scholar
  24. Fang X, Benamati J and Lederer AL (2011) Coping with rapid information technology change in different national cultures. European Journal of Information Systems 20 (5), 560–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Flavian C, Guinaliu M and Gurrea R (2006) The role played by perceived usability, satisfaction and consumer trust on website loyalty. Information and Management 43 (1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fornell C and Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18 (1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forrester Research (2010) Social mobile technographics: how consumers socialize on mobile phones. [WWW document] http://www.forrester.com/Social+Mobile+Technographics174+How+Consumers+Socialize+On+Mobile+Phones/fulltext/-/E-RES57636 (accessed 5 June 2013).
  28. Forrester Research (2011) Mobile commerce, there’s an app for that. [WWW document] http://blogs.forrester.com/peter_sheldon/11-06-17-mobile_commerce_theres_an_app_for_that (accessed 28 May 2012).
  29. Gerow JE, Galy E, Thatcher JB and Srite M (2010) Within-culture variation and information technology. In Technological Advancement in Developed and Developing Countries: Discoveries in Global Information Management (Hunter G and Tan F, Eds), pp 337–364, IGI Global, Hershey, Pennsylvania.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goodhue D, Lewis W and Thompson R (2007) Statistical power in analyzing interaction effects: questioning the advantage of PLS with product indicators. Information Systems Research 18 (2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL and Black WC (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 5th edn, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Hampton KN, Goulet LS, Rainie L and Purcell K (2011) Social networking sites and our lives – PEW research center. [WWW document] http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx (accessed 1 December 2011).
  33. Hess TJ, Fuller MA and Campbell D (2009) Designing interfaces with social presence: using vividness and extraversion to create social recommendation agents. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10 (12), 889–919.Google Scholar
  34. Hess TJ, Fuller MA and Mathew J (2005) Involvement and decision-making performance with a decision aid: the influence of social multimedia, gender, and playfulness. Journal of Management Information Systems 22 (3), 15–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hoehle H and Venkatesh V (2015) Development and validation of a mobile usability conceptualization and instrument. MIS Quarterly, (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Hoffman DL and Fodor M (2010) Can you measure the ROI of your social media marketing? MIT Sloan Management Review 52 (1), 41–49.Google Scholar
  37. Hofstede G (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values. Sage, Beverly Hills, California.Google Scholar
  38. Hofstede G (1983) The dimension of national cultures in fifty countries and three regions. In Explications in Cross-Cultural Psychology (Deregowski JB, Daiurawiec S and Annis RC, Eds), pp 335–355, Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam-Lisse, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  39. Hofstede G (1984) Culture’s Consequences. Sage, Newbury Park, California.Google Scholar
  40. Hofstede G (1993) Cultural constraints in management theories. The Academy of Management Executive 7 (1), 81–94.Google Scholar
  41. Hofstede G (2007) Geert Hofstede™ cultural dimensions. [WWW document] http://www.geert-hofstede.com (accessed 23 March 2007).
  42. Hofstede G (2012) National culture: countries. [WWW document] http://geert-hofstede.com/ (accessed 1 December 2012).
  43. Hofstede G and Bond MH (1988) The Confucius connection: from cultural roots to economic growth. Organizational Dynamics 16 (1), 4–21.Google Scholar
  44. Hong W, Thong JYL and Tam KY (2004) The effects of information format and shopping task on consumers’ online shopping behavior: a cognitive fit perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 21 (3), 151–188.Google Scholar
  45. Hong W, Thong JYL and Tam KY (2007) How do web users respond to non-banner-ads animation? The effects of task type and user experience. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58 (10), 1467–1482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Hu PJ, Chen H, Hu H, Larson C and Butierez C (2011) Law enforcement officers’ acceptance of advanced e-government technology: a survey study of COPLINK mobile. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10 (1), 6–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hu PJ, Ma PC and Chau PY (1999) Evaluation of user interface designs for information retrieval systems: a computer-based experiment. Decision Support Systems 27 (1-2), 125–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Huy Q and Shipilov A (2012) The key to social media success within organizations. MIT Sloan Management Review 54 (1), 73–81.Google Scholar
  49. Johns G (2006) The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review 31 (2), 386–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Jokela T, Koivumaa J, Pirkola J, Salminen P and Kantola N (2006) Methods for quantitative usability requirements: a case study on the development of the user interface of a mobile phone. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 6 (10), 345–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Jordan JV and Surrey JL (1986) The self-in-relation: empathy and the mother-daughter relationship. In The Psychology of Today’s Woman: New Psychoanalytic Visions (Bernay T and Cantor DW, Eds), pp 81–104, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  52. Kang SH (2007) The impact of digital iconic realism on anonymous interactants’ mobile phone communication. In Proceedings of Computer and Human Interaction ACM Student Research Competition (28 May 2007), pp 2207–2212.Google Scholar
  53. Kim H, Chan H and Gupta S (2007) Value-based adoption of mobile internet: an empirical investigation. Decision Support Systems 43 (1), 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kim S and Stoel L (2004) Apparel retailers: website quality dimensions and satisfaction. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 2 (11), 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kim C, TAO W, SHIN N and KIM KS (2010) An empirical study of customers' perceptions of security and trust in e-payment systems. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 9 (1), 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirkman BL, Lowe KB and Gibson CB (2006) A quarter century of culture’s consequences: a review of empirical research incorporating Hofstede’s cultural value framework. Journal of International Business Studies 37 (3), 285–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Kirkman BL and Shapiro DL (2005) The impact of cultural value diversity on multicultural team performance. In Advances in International Management: Managing Multinational Teams (Shapiro DL, Von Glinow MA and Cheng JL, Eds), 33–67, Elsevier, London.Google Scholar
  58. Kurniawan S (2008) Older people and mobile phones: a multi-method investigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66 (12), 889–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Larson K and Watson R (2011) Tying social media strategy to firm performance: a social media analytics framework. In Proceedings of International Conference on Information Systems, pp 1–18. [WWW document] http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2011/proceedings/onlinecommunity/10 (accessed 7 December 2011).
  60. Lee AS and Baskerville RL (2003) Generalizing generalizability in information systems research. Information Systems Research 14 (3), 221–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Leidner DE and Kayworth T (2006) A review of culture in information systems research: toward a theory of information technology culture conflict. MIS Quarterly 30 (2), 357–399.Google Scholar
  62. Leidner DE, Koch H and Gonzalez E (2010) Assimilating generation Y IT new hires into USAA’s workforce: the role of an enterprise 2.0 system. MIS Quarterly Executive 9 (4), 229–242.Google Scholar
  63. Li X, Hess T, Mcnab A and YU Y (2009) Culture and acceptance of global web sites: a cross-country study of the effects of national cultural values on acceptance of a personal web portal. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 40 (4), 62–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lin C, Hu PJ and Chen H (2004) Technology implementation management in law enforcement: COPLINK systems usability and user acceptance evaluations. Social Science Computer Review 22 (1), 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Luo X and Warkentin M (2007) Consumers’ preferences and attitudes toward mobile office use: a technology trade-off research agenda. In E-Business Process Management: Technologies and Solutions (Sounderpandian J and Sinha T, Eds), pp 176–185, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  66. Mackenzie SB, Podsakoff PM and Podsakoff NP (2011) Construct measurement and validation procedures in MIS and behavioral research: integrating new and existing techniques. MIS Quarterly 35 (2), 293–334.Google Scholar
  67. Martinsons MG and Davison RM (2007) Strategic decision making and support systems: comparing American, Chinese and Japanese management. Decision Support Systems 43 (1), 284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Martonik A (2013) Larry page: 1.5 million android devices activated every day. [WWW document] http://www.androidcentral.com/larry-page-15-million-android-devices-activated-every-day (accessed 14 July 2013).
  69. McCoy S, Galletta DF and King WR (2007) Applying TAM across cultures: the need for caution. European Journal of Information Systems 16 (1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Middleton CA and Cukier W (2006) Is mobile email functional or dysfunctional? Two perspectives on mobile email usage. European Journal of Information Systems 15 (3), 252–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Molinsky A (2007) Cross-cultural code-switching: the psychological challenges of adapting behavior in foreign cultural integrations. Academy of Management Review 32 (2), 622–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Neyem A, Ochoa SF and Pino JA (2008) Coordination patterns to support mobile collaboration. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 5411 (1), 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Newman KL and Nollen SD (1996) Culture and congruence: the fit between management practices and national culture. Journal of International Business Studies 27 (4), 753–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Nielsen J (2012) Mobile usability update. [WWW document] http://www.useit.com/alertbox/mobile-usability.html (accessed 13 May 2012).
  75. Nielsen Norman Group (2012) Usability of mobile websites & applications. [WWW document] http://www.nngroup.com/reports/mobile/ (accessed 13 May 2012).
  76. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric Theory, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  77. Ou CXJ and Davison RM (2011) Interactive or interruptive: instant messaging at work. Decision Support Systems 52 (1), 61–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Parboteeah D, Valacich JS and Wells JD (2009) The influence of website characteristics on a consumer’s urge to buy impulsively. Information Systems Research 1 (20), 60–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Piskorski MJ (2011) Social strategies that work. Harvard Business Review 89 (11), 116–122.Google Scholar
  80. Porter CE, Donthu N, Macelroy WH and Wydra D (2011) How to foster and sustain engagement in virtual communities. California Management Review 53 (4), 80–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rai A, Lang S and Walker R (2002) Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Information Systems Research 13 (1), 50–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rai A, Maruping L and Venkatesh V (2009) Offshore information systems project success: the role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics. MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 617–641.Google Scholar
  83. Ringle CM, Wende S and Becker JM (2005) SmartPLS 2.0. Hamburg. [WWW document] http://www.smartpls.de (accessed 14 July 2011).
  84. Santos AC, Cardoso JM, Ferreira DR, Diniz PC and Chaínho P (2010) Providing user context for mobile and social networking applications. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 6 (3), 324–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schein EH (1985) Organizational Culture and Leadership. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  86. Schoknecht P (2012) 5 factors of mobile application success. [WWW document] http://www.clickz.com/clickz/column/2144961/factors-mobile-application-success (accessed 1 December 2011).
  87. Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Zanna MP, Ed), pp 1–65, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Sia CL, Lim KH, Leung K, Lee MKO, Huang WW and Benbasat I (2009) Web strategies to promote internet shopping: is cultural-customization needed? MIS Quarterly 33 (3), 491–521.Google Scholar
  89. Sorensen C and Altaitoon A (2008) Organisational usability of mobile computing-volatility and control in mobile foreign exchange trading. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 12 (66), 916–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Spector PE et al (2002) Locus of control and well-being at work: how generalizable are western findings? Academy of Management Journal 45 (2), 453–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Srite M and Karahanna E (2006) The role of espoused national cultural values in technology acceptance. MIS Quarterly 30 (3), 679–704.Google Scholar
  92. Tan FB, Tung LL and Xu Y (2009) A study of web-designers’ criteria for effective business-to-consumer (B2C) website using the repertory grid technique. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 10 (3), 155–177.Google Scholar
  93. Thatcher JB, Srite M and Stepina LL (2003) Culture, overload, and personal innovativeness with information technology: extending the nomological net. Journal of Computer Information Systems 44 (1), 74–82.Google Scholar
  94. Thong JYL, Hong W and Tam KY (2002) Understanding user acceptance of digital libraries: what are the roles of interface characteristics, organizational context, and individual differences? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 57 (3), 215–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Trompenaars F and Hampden-Turner C (1998) Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Global Business, 2nd edn, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  96. Valacich JS, Parboteeah D and Wells JD (2007) Not all interface characteristics are created equal: the online consumer’s hierarchy of needs. Communications of the ACM 50 (9), 84–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Vance A, Elie-Dit-Cosaque C and Straub D (2008) Examining trust in information technology artifacts: the effects of system quality and culture. Journal of Management Information Systems 24 (4), 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Venkatesh V and Agarwal R (2006) Turning visitors into customers: a usability-centric perspective on purchase behavior in electronic channels. Management Science 52 (3), 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Venkatesh V, Davis F and Morris M (2007) Dead or alive? the development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8 (4), 267–286.Google Scholar
  100. Venkatesh V and Goyal S (2010) Expectation disconfirmation and technology adoption: polynomial modeling and response surface analysis. MIS Quarterly 34 (2), 281–303.Google Scholar
  101. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis F and Davis G (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27 (3), 425–478.Google Scholar
  102. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Sykes TA and Ackerman PL (2004) Individual reactions to new technologies in the workplace: the role of gender as a psychological construct. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 34 (3), 445–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Venkatesh V and Ramesh V (2006) Web and wireless site usability: understanding differences and modeling use. MIS Quarterly 30 (1), 181–206.Google Scholar
  104. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL and Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly 36 (1), 157–178.Google Scholar
  105. Venkatesh V and Zhang X (2010) Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: US vs. China. Journal of Global Information Technology Management 13 (1), 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Wagner JA (1995) Studies of individualism-collectivism: effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal 38 (1), 152–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wang S and Barnes SJ (2009) An analysis of the potential for mobile auctions in China. International Journal of Mobile Communications 7 (1), 36–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Wells JD, Fuerst WL and Palmer JW (2005) Designing consumer interfaces for experiential tasks: an empirical investigation. European Journal of Information Systems 14 (3), 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wells JD, Valacich JS and Hess TJ (2011) What signal are you sending? How website quality influences perceptions of product quality and purchase intentions. MIS Quarterly 35 (2), 373–396.Google Scholar
  110. Wobbrock JO, Myers BA and Aung HH (2008) The performance of hand postures in front-and back-of-device interaction for mobile computing. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 66 (12), 857–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Xiao Z and Tsui AS (2007) When brokers may not work: the cultural contingency of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly 52 (1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  112. Xu Y, Tung LL and Tan FB (2009) Attributes of website usability: a study of web users with the repertory grid technique. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 4 (13), 99–128.Google Scholar
  113. Yen B, Hu PJ and Wang M (2007) Towards analytical approach to effective website designs: a framework for modeling, evaluation and enhancement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 6 (2), 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Youens R (2011) 7 habits of highly effective apps. [WWW document] http://gigaom.com/2011/07/16/7-habits-of-highly-effective-apps/ (accessed 28 May 2011).
  115. Zhang D, Lowry PB, Zhou L and Fu X (2007) The impact of individualism-collectivism, social presence, and group diversity on group decision making under majority influence. Journal of Management Information Systems 23 (4), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Zhang X and Maruping LM (2008) Household technology adoption in a global marketplace: incorporating the role of espoused cultural values. Information Systems Frontiers 10 (4), 403–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Operational Research Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hartmut Hoehle
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaojun Zhang
    • 2
  • Viswanath Venkatesh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information SystemsSam M. Walton College of Business, University of ArkansasU.S.A.
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemsBusiness Statistics and Operations Management, The Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong Kong

Personalised recommendations