Skip to main content
Log in

Doing the politics of technological decision making: due process and the debate about identity cards in the U.K.

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Information Systems

Abstract

The U.K. Government, in presenting its proposals for biometric identity cards, made strong claims about the technology and science underlying the proposed National Identity Scheme. In this paper, we use insights from science and technology studies (STS), particularly Latour's ‘Politics of Nature’ argument, to analyse the parliamentary debates about the technological and scientific aspects of the proposals. The authors were part of a team that produced a report that raised a series of perplexities about the Scheme in an attempt to counter the short-circuiting of discussion of these perplexities in the parliamentary debate. The paper analyses the government's attempts at short-circuiting in light of Latour's argument and the introduction of perplexities by our report. It demonstrates the extent to which this form of STS can enhance political debate about technological decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgar A Whitley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Whitley, E., Hosein, I. Doing the politics of technological decision making: due process and the debate about identity cards in the U.K.. Eur J Inf Syst 17, 668–677 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.53

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2008.53

Keywords

Navigation