Advertisement

The European Journal of Development Research

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 143–153 | Cite as

Frugal Innovation and Development: Aides or Adversaries?

  • Peter KnorringaEmail author
  • Iva Peša
  • André Leliveld
  • Cees van Beers
Original Article

Abstract

Frugal innovation aims to bring products, services and systems within the reach of billions of poor and emerging middle-class consumers. Through significantly cutting costs while safeguarding user value, frugal innovation opens opportunities for new business models and may well disrupt innovation processes in entire economies. The debate on the developmental implications of frugal innovation is ideologically polarized. Whereas advocates suggest a business view of ‘win-win’ in which companies can earn profits while simultaneously alleviating poverty, critics argue that frugal innovation will merely exacerbate capitalist exploitation and inequality. In this contribution we argue that an empirical approach is needed to assess where and when frugal innovation is more likely to enhance inclusive development.

Keywords

frugal innovation entrepreneurship technology inclusive development inequality 

Abstract

Les innovations frugales portent des produits, des services, et des systèmes à la portée de billions de consommateurs pauvres et de l’aspirante classe moyenne. Les innovations frugales baissent les couts et préservent la valeur pour les consommateurs, et créent des nouveaux modèles économiques qui ont le potentiel de perturber les processus d’innovation dans plusieurs économies. Le débat sur les implications développementales de l’innovation frugale est idéologiquement polarisé. Les défenseurs des innovations frugales suggèrent un scenario d’affaires bénéfique pour toutes les parties, ou les entreprises peuvent réaliser des profits simultanément soulageant la pauvreté. Les critiques des innovations frugales soutiennent qu’elles vont simplement augmenter l’exploitation capitale et l’inégalité. Dans cet article, on soutien qu’un approche empirique est nécessaire pour établir où et quand une innovation frugale est plus susceptible de soutenir le développement inclusif.

References

  1. Abdelnour, S. and Saeed, A.M. (2014) Technologizing humanitarian space: Darfur advocacy and the rape-stove Panacea. International Political Sociology 8 (2): 145–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, N. and Brem, A. (2012) Frugal and Reverse Innovation – Literature Overview and Case Study Insights from a German MNC in India and China. In: Proceedings of the 2012 18th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation. June 18–20 2012, Stuttgart: 1–11.Google Scholar
  3. Aker, J.C. and Mbiti, I.M. (2010) Mobile phones and economic development in Africa. Journal of Economic Perspectives 24 (3): 207–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ansari, S., Munir, K. and Gregg, T. (2012) Impact at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies 49 (4): 813–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arora, S. and Romijn, H. (2011) The empty rhetoric of poverty reduction at the base of the pyramid. Organization 19 (4): 481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badiane, K. and Berdish, D. (2011) Comments. Current Anthropology 52 (3): 580–581.Google Scholar
  7. Banks, N. and Hulme, D. (2014) New development alternatives or business as usual with a new face? The transformative potential of new actors and alliances in development. Third World Quarterly 35 (1): 181–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. van Beers, C., Knorringa, P. and Leliveld, A. (2013) Understanding frugal innovation in Africa: Schumpeter revisited. Discussion Paper for the International Workshop ‘The (Mis)Fortune of Frugal Innovation’; 28–29 March, Grenoble, France.Google Scholar
  9. van Beers, C., Leliveld, A. and Knorringa, P. (2012) Frugal innovation in Africa: Tracking Unilever’s washing-powder sachets. In: J.-B. Gewald, A. Leliveld and I. Peša (eds.) Transforming Innovations in Africa: Explorative Studies on Appropriation in African Societies. Leiden, The Netherlands and Boston, MA: Brill, pp. 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berdegué, J.A. (2005) Pro-Poor Innovation Systems. Background Paper IFAD, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar
  11. Bhatti, Y. (2012) What is Frugal, What is Innovation? Towards a Theory of Frugal Innovation. Said Business School, Working Paper, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  12. Blowfield, M. and Dolan, C.S. (2014) Business as a development agent: Evidence of possibility and improbability. Third World Quarterly 35 (1): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chataway, J., Hanlin, R. and Kaplinsky, R. (2014) Inclusive innovation: An architecture for policy development. Innovation and Development 4 (1): 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chironga, M., Leke, A., Lund, S. and van Wamelen, A. (2011) Cracking the next growth market: Africa. Harvard Business Review, 89 (5): 117–122.Google Scholar
  15. Clark, N. et al. (2009) Below the Radar: What Does Innovation in the Asian Driver Economies Have to Offer other Low Income Economies? Innogen Working Paper, Milton Keynes, UK.Google Scholar
  16. Cozzens, S. and Sutz, J. (2014) Innovation in informal settings: Reflections and proposals for a research agenda. Innovation and Development 4 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cross, J. and Street, A. (2009) Anthropology at the bottom of the pyramid. Anthropology Today 25 (4): 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dolan, C. (2012) The new face of development: The ‘bottom of the pyramid’ entrepreneurs. Anthropology Today 28 (4): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dolan, C. and Roll, K. (2013) Capital’s new frontier: From ‘unusable’ economies to bottom-of-the-pyramid markets in Africa. African Studies Review 56 (3): 123–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncombe, R.A. (2012) An evidence-based framework for assessing the potential of mobile finance in sub-saharan Africa. Journal of Modern African Studies 50 (3): 369–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. George, G., MacGahan, A.M. and Prabhu, J. (2012) Innovation for inclusive growth: Towards a theoretical framework and a research agenda. Journal of Management Studies 49 (4): 661–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gereffi, G. (2014) Global value chains in a post-Washington Consensus World. Review of International Political Economy 21 (1): 9–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Govindarajan, V. and Ramamurti, R. (2011) Reverse innovation, emerging markets, and global strategy. Global Strategy Journal 1 (3–4): 191–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hahn, R. (2012) Inclusive business, human rights and the dignity of the poor: A glance beyond economic impacts of adapted business models. Business Ethics: A European Review 21 (1): 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammond, A.L., Kramer, W.J., Tran, J., Katz, R. and Walker, C. (2007) The next 4 billion: Market size and business strategy at the base of the pyramid. World Resources Institute & IFC report, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  26. Hansen, M.W. and Schaumburg-Müller, H. (2010) Firms in developing countries: A theoretical probe into the borderland of business studies and development studies. European Journal of Development Research 22 (2): 197–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Heeks, R. (2014) ICTs and Poverty Eradication: Comparing Economic, Livelihoods and Capabilities Models. Development Informatics Working Paper Series, Manchester, UK.Google Scholar
  28. Heeks, R., Foster, C. and Nugroho, Y. (2014) New models of inclusive innovation for development. Innovation and Development 4 (2): 175–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes, N. and Lonie, S. (2007) M-PESA: Mobile money for the ‘unbanked’ turning cellphones into 24-hour tellers in Kenya. Innovations 2 (1–2): 63–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kaplinsky, R. (2011) Schumacher meets Schumpeter: Appropriate technology below the radar. Research Policy 40 (2): 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplinsky, R. and Farooki, M. (2010) What Are the Implications for Global Value Chains when the Market Shifts from the North to the South? World Bank Working Paper, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  32. Karnani, A. (2007) The mirage of marketing to the bottom of the pyramid: How the private sector can help alleviate poverty. California Management Review 49 (4): 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kolk, A., Rivera-Santos, M. and Rufin, C. (2013) Reviewing a decade of research on the ‘base/bottom of the pyramid’ (BOP) concept. Business & Society 20 (10): 1–40.Google Scholar
  34. Landrum, N.E. (2007) Advancing the ‘base of the pyramid’ debate. Strategic Management Review 1 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  35. London, T., Anupindi, R. and Sheth, S. (2010) Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. Journal of Business Research 63 (6): 582–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meagher, K. and Lindell, I. (2013) ASR forum: Engaging with African informal economies: Social inclusion or adverse incorporation? African Studies Review 56 (3): 57–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mendoza, R.U. and Thelen, N. (2008) Innovations to make markets more inclusive for the poor. Development Policy Review 26 (4): 427–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morawczynski, O. (2009) Exploring the usage and impact of ‘transformational’ mobile financial services: The case of M-PESA in Kenya. Journal of Eastern African Studies 3 (3): 509–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, J.T., Carmody, P. and Surborg, B. (2014) Industrial transformation or business as usual? Information and communication technologies and Africa’s place in the global information economy. Review of African Political Economy 41 (140): 264–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Papaioannou, T. (2014) How inclusive can innovation and development be in the twenty-first century? Innovation and Development 4 (2): 187–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peša, I. (2015) The ‘transformational’ potential of mobile money in Zambia: Frugal innovation, inclusive innovation and mobile money agents in Kitwe. Paper Presented at the Workshop ‘Can Frugal Innovation Become Inclusive Innovation; 26–27 November, ISS The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  42. Prahalad, C.K. (2006) The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
  43. Prahalad, C.K. (2012) Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management 29 (1): 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prahalad, C.K. and Hall, S.L. (2002) The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy+Business 26 (1): 1–14.Google Scholar
  45. Radjou, N. (2009) Polycentric innovation: The new global innovation agenda for MNCs. Harvard Business Review online publication, 5 November 2009.Google Scholar
  46. Radjou, N. and Prabhu, J. (2014) Frugal Innovation: How to do More with Less. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  47. Rao, B.C. (2013) How disruptive is frugal? Technology in Society 35 (1): 65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Santiago, F. (2014) Innovation for inclusive development. Innovation and Development 4 (1): 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schulpen, L. and Gibbon, P. (2002) Private sector development: Policies, practices and problems. World Development 30 (1): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schumacher, E.F. (1973) Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  51. Schumpeter, J. (1934) The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, Massachussets: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schwittay, A. (2011) The marketization of poverty. Current Anthropology 52 (3): 571–582.Google Scholar
  53. Szirmai, A. (2005) The Dynamics of Socio-Economic Development: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. The Economist (2010) First break all the rules. 15 April.Google Scholar
  55. Tiwari, R. and Herstatt, C. (2012) Open Global Innovation Networks as Enablers of Frugal Innovation: Propositions Based on Evidence from India. Hamburg, Germany. Institute for Technology and Innovation Management Working Paper, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar
  56. Tiwari, R., Kalogerakis, K. and Herstatt, C. (2014) Frugal innovation and analogies: Some propositions for product development in emerging economies. Proceedings of the R&D Management Conference, June 3–6, Stuttgart, Germany: 15–23.Google Scholar
  57. World Bank (2010) Innovation Policy: A Guide for Developing Countries. Washington, DC: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.Google Scholar
  58. Ya’u, Y. (2004) The new imperialism & Africa in the global electronic village. Review of African Political Economy 31 (99): 11–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zeschky, M., Winterhalter, S. and Gassmann, O. (2014) From cost to frugal and reverse innovation: Mapping the field and implications for global competitiveness. Research Technology Management 57 (4): 20–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Knorringa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Iva Peša
    • 2
  • André Leliveld
    • 2
  • Cees van Beers
    • 3
  1. 1.International Institute of Social Studies – Erasmus University of RotterdamThe HagueThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Leiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Technical University DelftDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations