Skip to main content
Log in

A Perfect Post-2015 Partner? Analysing EU’s Development and Trade Agendas for Global Development Partnership

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The European Journal of Development Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses the EU’s commitment to the achievement of international development goals from a policy coherence perspective. In particular, it looks at the ways in which the Union has contributed to the targets of global partnership for development (MDG-8) with its own initiatives on development financing and international trade with poorer countries. The article utilises the MDG-8 and its targets as a reference for policy coherence and takes stock of their implementation by the EU. In addition, it discusses prospects for the EU’s role in the post-2015 period in this regard. The article argues that the EU’s implementation of the MDG-8 has been insufficient and uneven. It also highlights the need for an impartial frame of reference for PCD based on concrete indicators. This would also help the EU to reinforce its approach to PCD and to act as a global partner.

Abstract

Cet article traite de l’engagement de l’Union européenne (UE) quant à la réalisation des Objectifs Mondiaux de Développement (OMD), dans une perspective de cohérence des politiques. En particulier, il examine les moyens par lesquels l’UE a contribué aux cibles relatives au partenariat mondial pour le développement (le huitième OMD ou OMD-8) avec ses propres initiatives en matière de financement du développement et de commerce international avec les pays les plus pauvres. L’article utilise l’OMD-8 et ses cibles comme la référence pour la cohérence des politiques et fait le bilan de leur mise en œuvre par l’UE. En outre, il examine les perspectives pour le rôle de l’UE dans la période de l’après-2015 à cet égard. L’article soutient que la mise en œuvre de l’OMD-8 par l’UE a été insuffisante et inégale. Il souligne également la nécessité d’un cadre impartial de référence pour la cohérence des politiques pour le développement (CPD) dans le contexte de l’après-2015. Cela aiderait également l’UE à renforcer son approche de CPD et à agir en tant que partenaire mondial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACP Council of Ministers (2007) Declaration of the ACP Council of Ministers at its 86th session expressing serious concern on the status of the negotiations of the Economic Partnership Agreements. ACP/25/013/07. Brussels, Belgium, 13 December 2007.

  • ACP Council of Ministers (2014) Resolution of the 99th Session of the ACP Council of Ministers on Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), http://www.acp.int/content/resolution-99th-session-acp-council-ministers-economic-partnership-agreements, accessed 27 September 2015.

  • African Union (2013) Declaration on the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs), http://ti.au.int/en/sites/default/files/EPA_DECLARATION_Final_edited%20clean.pdf, accessed 29 March 2014.

  • Alavi, A. (2010) EPAs, cotonou and the WTO: Legal dimension. In: Y. Ngangjoh-Hodu and F. Matambalya (eds.) Trade Relations Between the EU and Africa: Development, Challenges and Options Beyond the Cotonou Agreement. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilal, S. and Stevens, C. (eds.) (2009) The Interim Economic Partnership Agreements between the EU and African States: Contents, Challenges and Prospects. European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) and Overseas Development Institute (ODI). Policy Management Report 17. Maastricht, The Netherlands: ECDPM.

  • Brenton, P. and Özden, G. (2007) The effectiveness of EU and US unilateral trade preferences for LDCs: Rules of origin in the clothing sector. In: G. Faber and J. Orbie (eds.) European Union Trade Politics and Development: ‘Everything but Arms’ Unravelled. Oxon, UK and New York: Routledge, pp. 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2007a) The European Union and International Development: The Politics of Foreign Aid. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (2007b) EBA, EU trade policy and the ACP: A tale of two North-South divides. In: G. Faber and J. Orbie (eds.) European Union Trade Politics and Development: ‘Everything but Arms’ Unravelled. Oxon, UK and New York: Routledge, pp. 43–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, M. (ed.) (2009) Mission impossible: The European Union and policy coherence for development. In: Policy Coherence and European Development Policy. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (2012) Personal Communication on Post-2015 Development Agenda, Ministry for Foreign Affairs, Finland, Helsinki, 7 May 2012.

  • Daugbjerg, C. and Swinbank, A. (2009) Ideas, Institutions, and Trade: The WTO and the Curious Role of EU Farm Policy in Trade Liberalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Di Francesco, M. (2001) Process not outcomes in new public management? Policy coherence’ in Australia. The Drawing Board 1 (3): 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Accountability Report on Financing for Development (2014) Review of progress by the EU and its Member States. Commission Staff Working Paper Brussels, Belgium, 3 July 2014 SWD(2014) 235 final, PART 1/5.

  • EU Donor Profiles (2010) European Commission, Accompanying Document to COM (2010) 159.

  • European Commission (2011) Agenda for Change, Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, Increasing the impact of EU Development Policy: an Agenda for Change. Brussels, Belgium, 13 October 2011 COM (2011) 637 final.

  • European Commission (2013) Decent Life For All: Ending Poverty and giving the world a sustainable future, Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, Belgium, 27 February 2013 COM (2013) 92 final.

  • European Commission (2015) A Global Partnership for Poverty Eradication and Sustainable Development after 2015. Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, Belgium, 5 February 2015 COM (2015) 44 final.

  • Flint, A. (2008) Trade, Poverty and the Environment: The EU, Cotonou and the African-Caribbean-Pacific Bloc. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forster, J. and Stokke, O. (eds.) (1999) Policy Coherence in Development Co-operation. London: Frank Cass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Europe Competing in the World – A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy (2006) European Commission DG Trade Global Europe Competing in the World – A Contribution to the EU’s Growth and Jobs Strategy. Brussels: European Commission.

  • Hoebink, P. (ed.) (2004) Evaluating maastricht’s triple C: The ‘C’ of coherence. In: The Treaty of Maastricht and Europe’s Development Co-operation. Studies in European Development Co-operation Evaluation No 1. Brussels, Belgium: European Union, pp. 183–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. (2002) The EU and the Third World. London: Palgrave/Macmillan EU Studies Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, A. and Low, P. (2006) Special and differential treatment in the WTO: Why, when, and how? In: S. Evenett and B. Hoekman (eds.) Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank, pp. 147–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessie, E. (2007) The legal status of special and differential treatment provisions under the WTO agreements’. In: G.A. Bermann and P.C. Mavroidis (eds.) Developing Countries in the WTO System. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 12–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lesage, D. and Kerremans, B. (2007) The political dynamics behind US and EU trade initiatives towards least developed countries. In: G. Faber and J. Orbie (eds.) European Union Trade Politics and Development: ‘Everything but Arms’ Unravelled. Oxon, UK and New York: Routledge, pp. 74–95.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Messerlin, P.A. (2006) Reforming agricultural policies in the Doha round. In: S. Evenett and B. Hoekman (eds.) Economic Development and Multilateral Trade Cooperation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan and the World Bank, pp. 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meunier, S. (2007) Managing globalization? The EU in international trade negotiations’. Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4): 905–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, B. (2004) From Seattle and Doha to Cancún: the trade agenda in the Millennium Round. In: B. Hocking and S. McGuire (eds.) Trade Politics. 2nd Edn. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngangjoh-Hodu, Y. (2010) Development agenda in the WTO regional processes: The EU-ACP economic partnership agreement in context. In: Y. Ngangjoh-Hodu and F. Matambalya (eds.) Trade Relations between the EU and Africa: Development, Challenges and Options beyond the Cotonou Agreement. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014) Paris declaration and the accra agenda for action, http://www.oecd.org/dac/effectiveness/parisdeclarationandaccraagendaforaction.htm, accessed 22 July 2015.

  • OECD (2015) Policy coherence for inclusive and sustainable development. OECD and Post-2015 Reflections, Element 8, Paper 1. Paris: OECD.

  • OECD (1996) Building policy coherence. Public Management Occasional Papers. Paris: OECD.

  • Open Working Group on Sustainable Development Goals (2014) Open Working Group Proposal for Sustainable Development Goals A/68/970, http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/68/970&Lang=E, accessed 5 September 2014.

  • Orbie, J. (2007) The development of EBA. In: G. Faber and J. Orbie (eds.) European Union Trade Politics and Development: ‘Everything but Arms’ Unravelled. Oxon, UK and New York: Routledge, pp. 20–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2005) The End of Poverty: Economic Possibilities of Our Time. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J.E. and Charlton, A. (2005) Fair Trade for All: How Trade Can Promote Development. Oxford and NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stocchetti, M. (2013) Inside the European Consensus on Development and Trade: Analyzing the EU’s Normative Power and Policy Coherence for Development in Global Governance. Helsinki, Finland: University of Helsinki, Publications of the Department of Political and Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • The European Consensus on Development (2005) European Commission Communication from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Brussels, Belgium, 13 July 2005 COM (2005) 311, final.

  • UNDP (2012) Realizing the Future We Want for All. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

  • UN MDG Gap Task Force Report (2013) The Challenge We Face, http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/publications/mdg-gap-task-force-report-2013.html, accessed 30 August 2014.

  • UN Millennium Declaration (2000) Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 55th session, A/res/55/2, http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm, accessed 1 February 2014.

  • UN Millennium Development Goals (2001) http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/global, accessed 1 September 2014.

  • van den Hoven, A. (2007) Bureaucratic competition in EU trade policy: EBA as a case of competing two-level games?’ In: G. Faber and J. Orbie (eds.) European Union Trade Politics and Development: ‘Everything But Arms’ Unravelled. Oxon, UK and New York: Routlege, pp. 60–73.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van Reisen, M. (2007) The enlarged European Union and the developing world: What future? In: A. Mold (ed.) EU Development Policy in a Changing World: Challenges for the 21st Century. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press, pp. 29–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • WTO (2001) Doha Declaration and Doha Development Agenda. WT/MIN (01)/DEC/01, WTO Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stocchetti, M. A Perfect Post-2015 Partner? Analysing EU’s Development and Trade Agendas for Global Development Partnership. Eur J Dev Res 28, 76–90 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.78

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2015.78

Keywords

Navigation