Abstract
Most studies on distribution in developing countries are concerned with the distribution of material resources, most usually income or consumption, and sometimes wealth. On the other hand, most studies on social capital are grounded in countries of the developed world. In this article, we depart from both traditions by analysing the distribution of social capital in a developing country (India). In so doing, we establish a link with the subject matter of political economy by examining the relationship between the distribution of social capital, the distribution of confidence in public bodies and electoral participation. Results show that participation in social activities is strongly correlated to trust in public bodies, which in turn favours participation in political life through voting. However, contrary to results obtained in different contexts, individuals belonging to discriminated groups tend to have more confidence in institutions.
Abstract
La plupart des études sur la répartition dans les pays en développement portent sur celle des ressources matérielles, comme, le plus souvent, les revenus, la consommation et, parfois, la richesse. En revanche, les études sur la distribution du capital social s’inscrivent, pour la plupart, dans le contexte des pays développés. Cet article rompt avec cette double tradition en analysant la répartition du capital social dans un pays en développement, l’Inde. De plus, nous lions cette question avec des thèmes propres à l’économie politique en examinant la relation entre la répartition du capital social, la répartition de la confiance dans les organismes publics, et la participation électorale. Les résultats montrent que la participation aux activités sociales est fortement corrélée à la confiance dans les organismes publics, qui elle-même favorise la participation à la vie politique, au travers du vote. Toutefois, contrairement aux résultats obtenus dans des contextes différents, les membres des groupes discriminés ont tendance à avoir davantage confiance dans les institutions.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Extending across the states of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Andhra Pradesh, Orissa, Bihar and West Bengal, with another 15 million living in the hills of northeastern India (Guha, 2007).
For instance, see Alesina and La Ferrara (2002) in the US context.
Except that membership of NGOs had no significant effect on the degree of confidence towards courts. For more details, please refer to Table 11, which displays marginal probabilities.
Except that membership of religious or social groups had a significant positive effect on the degree of confidence towards politicians.
See, for instance, Helliwell and Putnam (2007) or Alesina and La Ferrara (2002).
Five regional dummies were created: central, which includes Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand; the south, which includes Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala and Tamil Nadu; the west, which includes Maharashtra and Gujarat; the east, which includes Orissa, West Bengal, Assam and the northeastern states; and finally the north, which is composed of Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Punjab, Haryana and Delhi.
References
Ahsan, N. (2007) Social Networks Make a Difference. Center for the Study of Social Policy. Baltimore, MD: Ann Casey Foundation.
Akerlof, G.A. and Schiller, R.J. (2009) Animal Spirits. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2000) Participation in heterogeneous communities. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 847–904.
Alesina, A. and La Ferrara, E. (2002) Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics 85 (2): 207–234.
Algan, Y. and Cahuc, P. (2010) Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review 100 (5): 2060–2092.
Basant, R. and Shariff, A. (2010) Handbook of Muslims in India. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.
Brehm, J. and Rahn, W. (1997) Individual-level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 999–1023.
Borooah, V.K. (2006) Incumbency and parliamentary elections in India: An analysis of the congress party’s electoral performance, 1962–1999. Economic and Political Weekly XLI (8): 739–746.
Borooah, V.K. (2012) Corruption in India: A quantitative analysis. Economic and Political Weekly XLVII (28): 23–24.
Bourdieu, P. (1983) The forms of social capital. In: G. John Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. TX: Greenwood Press.
Chong, D. (1995) Rational choice theory’s mysterious rivals. Critical Review 9 (1–2): 37–57.
Desai, S. and Vanneman, R. and National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi (2009) India Human Development Survey (IHDS), 2005 [Computer file]. ICPSR22626-v5. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2009-06-22, doi:10.3886/ICPSR22626.
Goldin, C. and Katz, L. (1999) Human capital and social capital: The rise of secondary schooling in America, 1910–1940. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 29 (Spring): 683–723.
Greif, A. (1993) Contract enforceability and economic institutions in early trade: The maghribi traders’ coalition. American Economic Review 83 (3): 525–548.
Guha, R. (2007) Adivasis, Naxalities, and Indian democracy. Economic and Political Weekly XLII (32): 3305–3312.
Helliwell, J. and Putnam, R. (2007) Education and social capital. Eastern Economics Journal 33 (1): 1–19.
Hoff, K., Kshetramade, M. and Fehr, E. (2011) Caste and punishment: The legacy of caste culture in norm enforcement. Economic Journal 121 (556): F449–F475.
Hoff, K. and Pandey, P. (2006) Discrimination, social identity, and durable inequalities. American Economic Review 96 (2): 206–211.
Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4): 1251–1288.
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1999) The quality of government. Journal of Law and Economics 15 (1): 222–279.
Putman, R. (2000) Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Sen, A.K. (2001) The discipline of cost-benefit analysis. Journal of Legal Studies 29 (S2): 931–952.
Solow, R. (1995) Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity (book review). The New Republic 213 (11): 36–40.
Thorat, S. (2009) Dalits in India: Search for a Common Identity. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Uslaner, E.M. (2009) Corruption, inequality, and trust. In: G.T. Svendsen and G.H. Svendsen (eds.) Handbook of Social Capital. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Uslaner, E.M. (2010) Corruption, Inequality, and Trust: The Bulging Pocket Makes the Easy Life. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press.
Wollebaek, D. and Selle, P. (2003) Participation and social capital formation: Norway in a comparative perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (1): 67–91.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Benoit Le-Maux, the participants of the Workshop on the Political Economy of Redistribution organized by the Condorcet Centre for Political Economy, University of Rennes, the journal’s editor and, most importantly, two anonymous referees for comments that have substantially improved the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bros, C., Borooah, V. Confidence in Public Bodies, and Electoral Participation in India. Eur J Dev Res 25, 557–583 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.18
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2013.18