Bringing the Effects of Occupational Licensing into Focus: Optician Licensing in the United States

Abstract

The labor market institution of occupational licensing continues to grow in scope in the United States and abroad. In this paper, we estimate the effects of occupational licensing on opticians using data from the US Census and American Community Survey. Our results suggest that optician licensing is associated with opticians receiving as much as 16.9 percent more in annual earnings. In an examination of malpractice insurance premiums in all states and participation rates in optician certification programs in Texas, we find little evidence that optician licensing has enhanced the quality of services delivered to consumers. By and large, optician licensing appears to be reducing consumer welfare by raising the earnings of opticians without enhancing the quality of services delivered to consumers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    We also investigated the effects of optician licensing on the earnings of optometrists over the same time period (1940–2012) and found no evidence that optician licensing has affected the earnings of optometrists. Ophthalmologists are not identifiable in the Census or ACS — all medical doctors are included in the category of “physicians.”

  2. 2.

    Imputed hourly wages were examined through self-reported hours worked and weeks worked. Some of the data on weeks worked were gathered in intervals, so the medium of the range was used. The results do not substantially change if wages are used as opposed to annual earnings. Also, any changes in the sample (for instance, restricting the analysis to the period 1940–2000) made no material difference in the results.

  3. 3.

    Ideally we would also control for the difficulty of each exam, but data on exam difficulty from 1940 to 2012 is not available.

  4. 4.

    We also estimated the effects of optician licensing on employment population ratios in each state. We found little evidence of any effect. We believe that optician licensing requirements discourage entry into the profession, but the ACS and Census do not provide sufficient data to explore this hypothesis further.

  5. 5.

    Each regression also includes person weights (representing the number of persons represented by each observation in the sample) provided by the Minnesota Population Center’s Integrated Public Use Microdata Series (http://www.ipums.org).

  6. 6.

    The procedure described in the Appendix of License to Work was used to transform education requirements into days. In licensing statutes, education requirements are often reported as “hours” or “clock hours.” For the conversion, hours were divided by 30 (reflecting a 6-hour school day and assuming 5 days of school per week) to convert education requirements into weeks. Weeks were then converted into days by multiplying by 7. If licensing requirements are expressed as years, the number is multiplied by 365. If expressed in terms of degrees, the standard completion time of two years is assumed for an associate’s degree and then multiplied by 365.

References

  1. Adams, Frank, John Jackson, and Robert Ekelund. 2002. Occupational Licensing in a “Competitive” Labor Market: The Case of Cosmetology. Journal of Labor Research, 23(2): 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, Kenneth. 1971. Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Chicago: Markham Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baicker, Katherine, Elliott S. Fisher, and Amitabh. Chandra. 2007. Malpractice Liability Costs and The Practice of Medicine in the Medicare Program. Health Affairs, 26(3): 841–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benham, Lee, and Alexandra Benham. 1975. Regulating Through the Professions: A Perspective on Information Control. Journal of Law and Economics, 18(2): 421–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carpenter II Dick M. et al 2012. License to Work: A National Study of Burdens from Occupational Licensing (Arlington, VA: Institute for Justice, May), http://www.ij.org/LicenseToWork.

  6. Cox, Carolyn, and Susan Foster. 1988. “The Costs and Benefits of Occupational Licensing,” Bureau of Economics, Federal Trade Commission, http://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/reports/costs-benefits-occupational-regulation/cox_foster_-_occupational_licensing.pdf (accessed February 1, 2015).

  7. Federman, Maya, David Harrington, and Kathy Krynski. 2006. The Impact of State Licensing Regulations on Low-Skilled Immigrants: The Case of Vietnamese Manicurists. American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, 96(2): 237–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feldman, Roger, and James Begun. 1978. The Effects of Advertising Lessons from Optometry. Journal of Human Resources, 13: 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Freidman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gellhorn, Walter. 1976. The Abuse of Occupational Licensing. University of Chicago Law Review, 44(1): 6–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haas-Wilson, Deborah, and Elizabeth Savoca. 1990. Quality and Provider Choice: A Multinomial Logit-Least-Squares Model with Selectivity. Health Services Research, 24(6): 791–809.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Han, Suyoun, and Morris Kleiner. 2015. “Analyzing the Duration of Occupational Licensing on the Labor Market”. Unpublished working paper, University of Minnesota.

  13. Kleiner, Morris M. 2000. Occupational Licensing. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4): 189–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kleiner, Morris. 2006. Licensing Occupations: Ensuring Quality or Restricting Competition. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kleiner, Morris. 2013. Stages of Occupational Regulation: Analysis of Case Studies. Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kleiner, Morris, and Alan Krueger. 2010. The Prevalence and Effects of Occupational Licensing. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4): 676–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kleiner, Morris, and Alan Krueger. 2013. Analyzing the Extent and Influence of Occupational Licensing on the Labor Market. Journal of Labor Economics, 31(2): S173–S202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kleiner, Morris, Allison Marier, Kyoung Won Park, and Coady Wing. 2014. “Relaxing Occupational Licensing Requirements: Analyzing Wages and Prices for a Medical Service.” NBER Working Paper 19906.

  19. Leland, Hayne. 1979. Quacks, Lemons, and Licensing: A Theory of Minimum Quality Standards. Journal of Political Economy, 87(6): 1328–1346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maurizi, Alex, Ruth Moore, and Lawrence Shepard. 1981. Competing for Professional Control: Professional Mix in the Eyeglasses Industry. Journal of Law and Economics, 24(2): 351–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maurizi, Alex. 1974. Occupational Licensing and the Public Interest. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): 399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mincer, Jacob. 1958. Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution. Journal of Political Economy, 66(4): 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Optician Training. 2014. “Optician Job Description, Top Requirements that Should Always be Included in the Optician Job Description,” http://www.opticiantraining.org/optician-job-description/ (accessed June 9, 2014).

  24. Rottenberg, Simon. 1962. The Economics of Occupational Licensing, in Aspects of Labor Economics, edited by Harold Groves Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ruggles, Steven et al 2010. Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: Version 5.0. [Machine-readable database] Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shapiro, Carl. 1986. Investment, Moral Hazard, and Occupational Licensing. Review of Economics Studies, 53(5): 843–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith, Adam. (1776) 1994. Wealth of Nations. New York: Modern Library Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tedeschi, B o d. 2004. Conflict over Contact Lenses New York Times, June 21.

  29. Thornton, Robert, and Edward J. Timmons. 2013. Licensing One of the World’s Oldest Professions: Massage. Journal of Law and Economics, 56(2): 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Timmons, Edward, and Robert J. Thornton. 2010. The Licensing of Barbers in the USA. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(4): 740–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Timmons, Edwards, and Robert Thornton. 2008. The Effects of Licensing on the Wages of Radiologic Technologists. Journal of Labor Research, 29(4): 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. The White House. 2015. “Occupational Licensing: A Framework for Policymakers.” July, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/licensing_report_final_nonembargo.pdf (accessed August 1, 2015).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward J Timmons.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Estimates of the Effects of Optician Licensing on Optician Employment-Population Ratio

Table A2

Table A2 Falsification Test — Estimates of the Effects of Optician Licensing on the Natural Logarithm of Lab Technician Earnings ($2012)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Timmons, E., Mills, A. Bringing the Effects of Occupational Licensing into Focus: Optician Licensing in the United States. Eastern Econ J 44, 69–83 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/eej.2016.4

Download citation

Keywords

  • occupational licensing
  • occupational regulation

Keywords

  • J44
  • I18