Advertisement

Eastern Economic Journal

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 611–629 | Cite as

Long-Term Trends in Intra-Financial Sector Lending in the United States (1950–2012)

  • Juan Antonio Montecino
  • Gerald Epstein
  • Iren Levina
Original Article

Abstract

This paper examines the evolution of intra-financial sector lending in the United States, 1950–2012, constructing estimates from the Federal Reserve’s Flow of Funds Accounts. Lending between financial institutions has grown nearly five-fold since the 1950s and currently accounts for roughly half of all financial sector lending. In the run up to the financial crisis of 2007–2008, the growth of intra-financial lending was concentrated in assets highly implicated in the genesis of the crisis, suggesting that this growth may have contributed to the crisis. This growth in intra-financial lending also raises questions about the contribution of the financial sector to the real economy.

Keywords

finance intra-financial lending financial crisis 

Keywords

G01 G10 G20 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Institute for New Economic Thinking (INET) for financial support and participants in workshops at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst and the New School for Social Research for helpful comments.

References

  1. Acemoglu, Daron, Asuman Ozdaglar, and Alireza Tahbaz-Salehi. 2013. Systemic Risk and Stability in Financial Networks. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, http://www.nber.org/papers/w18727.
  2. Allen, Franklin, and Ana Babus. 2009. Networks in Finance, in The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit, and Risk in an Interlinked World,, edited by Yoram Wind, Paul R Kleindorfer and Robert E. Gunther Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing, 367–379.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, Franklin, and Douglas Gale. 2000. Financial Contagion. The Journal of Political Economy, 108(1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arcand, Jean-Louis, Enrico Berkes, and Ugo Panizza. 2012. Too Much Finance? IMF Working Paper, No. 161. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  5. Bezemer, Dirk. 2012. Finance and Growth: When Credit Helps, and When it Hinders. Berlin: Institute for New Economic Thinking.Google Scholar
  6. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. 2011. Global Systemically Important Banks: Assessment Methodology and the Additional Loss Absorbency Requirement. Technical Report. Basel, Switzerland: Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
  7. Bhatia, Ashok Vir, and Tamim Bayoumi. 2012. Leverage? What Leverage? A Deep Dive into the US Flow of Funds in Search of Clues to the Global Crisis. IMF Working Papers, No. 162. Washington DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  8. D’Arista, Jane. 2009. Rebuilding the Framework for Financial Regulation. Technical Report 231. Washington DC. Economic Policy Institute, May.Google Scholar
  9. D’Arista, Jane, and Gerald Epstein. 2010. Dodd-Frank and the Regulation of Dangerous Financial Inter-Connectedness, in Will It Work? How Will We Know? The Future of Financial Reform, edited by Mike Konczal. New York: The Roosevelt Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Dasgupta, Amil. 2004. Financial Contagion through Capital Connections: A Model of the Origin and Spread of Bank Panics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2(6): 1049–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Epstein, Gerald, and James Crotty. 2012. How Big is Too Big?: On the Social Efficiency of the Financial Sector in the United States. in Capitalism on Trial: Explorations in the Tradition of Thomas E. Weisskopf. edited by Jeanette Wicks-Lim and Robert Pollin. Northampton, MA: E. Elgar Publisher, 293–310.Google Scholar
  12. Freixas, Xavier, Bruno M. Parigi, and Jean-Charles Rochet. 2000. Systemic Risk, Interbank Relations, and Liquidity Provision by the Central Bank. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 32(3): 611–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gai, Prasanna, Andrew Haldane, and Sujit Kapadia. 2011. Complexity, Concentration and Contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics, 58(5): 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gorton, Gary, and Andrew Metrick. 2009. The Run on Repo and the Panic of 2007–2008. Unpublished paper, Yale University.Google Scholar
  15. Greenwood, Robin, and David Scharfstein. 2013. The Growth of Finance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(2): 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montecino, Juan Antonio, and Gerald Epstein. 2014. Intra-Financial Lending, Credit, and Capital Formation. PERI Working Paper. Amherst, MA: Political Economy Research Institute.Google Scholar
  17. Philippon, Thomas. 2012. Has the US Finance Industry Become Less Efficient? On the Theory and Measurement of Financial Intermediation. Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research, http://www.nber.org/papers/w18077.
  18. Pozsar, Zoltan, Tobias Adrian, Adam Ashcraft, and Hayley Boesky. 2010. Shadow Banking. Technical Report 458. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, July.Google Scholar
  19. Shin, Hyun. 2010. Financial Intermediation and the Post-Crisis Financial System. Bank for International Settlements, BIS Working Papers No. 381, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2117753.
  20. The Times 2009. “Wake Up, Gentlemen”, World’s Top Bankers Warned by Former Fed Chairman Volcker. London: LexisNexis Academic.Google Scholar
  21. Turner, Adair. 2010. What Do Banks Do? Why Do Credit Booms and Busts Occur and What Can Public Policy Do About it? Technical Report, London School of Economics, London, http://innovbfa.viabloga.com/files/LSE___the_future_of_finance___aug_2010_1.pdf#page=9.
  22. Upper, Christian. 2011. Simulation Methods to Assess the Danger of Contagion in Interbank Markets. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(3): 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yellen, Janet L. 2003. Interconnectedness and systemic risk: Lessons from the financial crisis and policy implications. American Economic Association/American Finance Association Joint Luncheon.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EEA 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Antonio Montecino
    • 1
  • Gerald Epstein
    • 2
  • Iren Levina
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Economics, University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Economics and Political Economy Research Institute (PERI), University of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  3. 3.Department of Economics, Kingston UniversityLondonUK

Personalised recommendations