, Volume 51, Issue 2, pp 252–258 | Cite as

The Politics of Ableism

  • Gregor Wolbring


Gregor Wolbring at the invitation of the Editor to continue the ideas of an earlier article published in volume 49 number 4 shares with Development readers his understanding of the concept of ableism. He argues that the term ability should not be used just in relation to disabled people but understood in a broader cultural perspective. He highlights different forms of ableism, the role of new and emerging technologies, the consequences of different forms of ableism and the importance of dealing with the concept of ableism on the policy level, and proposes the need for a field of ability studies that examine ableism.


sexism racism transhumanism choice policy ability studies ableism 


  1. (2007) Ableism’,
  2. Herrnstein, Richard J. and Charles Murray (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  3. Merriam-Webster (2007) Ableism’,
  4. Miller, Paul, Sophia Parker and Sarah Gillinson (2004) Disablism How to Tackle the Last Prejudice, London, UK: Demos.Google Scholar
  5. Omvedt, Gail (2001) ‘The U.N., Racism and Caste – II Opinion’, The Hindu, 10 April.Google Scholar
  6. Sandberg, Anders (2001) ‘Morphological Freedom – Why We not just want it, but Need it’, Based on a talk given at the TransVision 2001 Conference, Berlin, 22–24 June.Google Scholar
  7. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2006) ‘Convention on Biological Diversity’,
  8. Silvers, Anita, David Wasserman and Mary B. Mahowald (1998) Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspective on justice in bioethics and public policy (Point/Counterpoint: Philosophers debate contemporary issues), Landham, Bolder, New York, Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Wolbring, Gregor (2003) ‘Science and Technology and the Triple D (Disease, Disability, Defect)’, in Mihail C. Roco and William Sims Bainbridge (eds.) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science pp 232–243, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publisher.Google Scholar
  10. Wolbring, Gregor (2004) ‘Solutions Follow Perceptions: NBIC and the concept of health, medicine, disability and disease’, Health Law Rev 12 (3): 41–46, PM:15706707.Google Scholar
  11. Wolbring, Gregor (2005) ‘HTA Initiative #23 The Triangle of Enhancement Medicine, Disabled People, and the Concept of Health: A new challenge for HTA, health research, and health policy’,
  12. Wolbring, Gregor (2006a) ‘Ableism and NBICS’,
  13. Wolbring, Gregor (2006b) ‘Nanotechnology for Health and Development’, Development 49 (4): 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wolbring, Gregor (2006c) ‘Human Security and NBICS’,
  15. Wolbring, Gregor (2007a) ‘NBICS, Other Convergences, Ableism and the Culture of Peace’,
  16. Wolbring, Gregor (2007b) ‘New and Emerging Sciences and Technologies, Ableism, Transhumanism and Religion, Faith, Theology and Churches’, Madang; International Journal of Contextual Theology in East Asia 7: 79–112.Google Scholar
  17. Wolbring, Gregor (2007c) ‘What Convergence is in the Cards for Future Scientists?’,’, Conference presentation, Vienna, May 2007 hosted on International Center for Bioethics Culture and Disability.
  18. Wolbring, Gregor (2007d) ‘Glossary for the 21st Century’,
  19. Wolbring, Gregor (2007e) ‘Why NBIC? Why human performance enhancement?’, The European Journal of Social Science Research 21 (1): 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wolbring, Gregor (2007f) ‘NBICS and Social Cohesion’,
  21. Wolbring, Gregor (2007g) ‘Enhancement of Animals’,
  22. Wolbring, Gregor (2007h) ‘NBICS and the Convention on Biological Diversity’,
  23. Wolbring, Gregor (2007i) ‘NBICS, Cultural Identity and Diversity, and the CBD’,’, 2007, The Choice is Yours biweekly column.

Copyright information

© Society for International Development 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gregor Wolbring

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations