Corporate Reputation Review

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 210–222 | Cite as

Valuing Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri
Original Article


This conceptual paper sheds light on some of the major intergovernmental benchmarks, guidelines and principles for corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate governance and sustainability reporting. It reports on several governments’ regulatory roles as their societal governance is intrinsically based on interdependent relationships. There are different actors and drivers who are shaping CSR communications and policies in relational frameworks. This paper mentions some of the countries that have already introduced intelligent substantive and reflexive regulations. It also shows how certain businesses are stepping in with their commitment for sustainability issues as they set their own policies and practices for laudable organisational behaviours. Very often, corporate businesses use non-governmental organisations’ regulatory tools such as process and performance-oriented standards. These regulatory instruments focus on issues such as labour standards, human rights, health and safety, environmental protection, corporate governance and the like. Afterwards, this paper discusses about the relationship between governance and sustainability. It makes reference to some of the relevant European Union Expert Group recommendations for non-financial reporting and CSR audits. Relevant academic contributions are indicating that customers are expecting greater disclosures, accountability and transparency in sustainability reports. This contribution contends that the way forward is to have more proactive governments that raise the profile of CSR. It maintains that CSR communications and stakeholder engagement may bring shared value to business and society. Ultimately, it is in the businesses’ interest to implement corporate sustainability and responsibility and to forge fruitful relationships with key stakeholders, including the regulatory ones, in order to address societal, environmental, governance and economic deficits.


corporate governance corporate social responsibility creating shared value CSR regulatory guidelines sustainability sustainability reporting 


  1. Agenda 21 (1992) ‘United Nations sustainable development’, Conference in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 13 June,, accessed 3 January, 2013.Google Scholar
  2. Albareda, L., Arenas, D. and Lozano, J. (2009) ‘The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders’, Journal of Business Ethics, 88 (1), 175–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aras, G. and Crowther, D. (2009) ‘Corporate sustainability reporting: a study in disingenuity?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 87 (1), 279–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkhout, F., Hertin, J., Wagner, M. and Tyteca, D. (2008) ‘Are EMS environmentally effective? The link between environmental management systems and environmental performance in European companies’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51 (2), 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird, R., Hall, A.D., Momentè, F. and Reggiani, F. (2007) ‘What corporate social responsibility activities are valued by the market?’ Journal of Business Ethics, 76 (2), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boll, J. (2005) ‘Corporate social responsibility and welfare state institutions’,, accessed 23 January, 2013.
  7. Bondy, K., Moon, J. and Matten, D. (2012) ‘An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications’, Journal of Business Ethics 111(2), 281–299.Google Scholar
  8. Carroll, A.B. (1991) ‘The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders’, Business Horizons, 34 (4), 39–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2004) Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L.J. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in Global Context, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  11. Crane, A., McWilliams, A., Matten, D., Moon, J. and Siegel, D. (2009) The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, Oxford Publications, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS) (2013) ‘Corporate responsibility: A government update’,, accessed 3 February, 2013.Google Scholar
  13. European Union (EU) (2007) National Public Policies in the European Union. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Enterprise Publications, Brussels.Google Scholar
  14. European Union (EU) (2011) ‘A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility’,, accessed 3 February, 2013.
  15. European Union (EU) (2012) ‘Sustainable and responsible business European Expert Group on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and SMEs’,, accessed 12 January, 2013.
  16. European Union (EU) (2014) ‘Non financial reporting’,, accessed 25 June, 2014.
  17. Ernst Young (EY) (2013) ‘Corporate social responsibility in India potential to contribute towards inclusive social development Global CSR Summit 2013: An agenda for inclusive growth’,$File/EY-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India.pdf, accessed 5 May, 2014.
  18. Fukukawa, K. and Moon, J. (2004) ‘A Japanese model of corporate social responsibility? A study of website reporting’, Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 16, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert, D.U. and Rasche, A. (2007) ‘Discourse ethics and social accountability – The ethics of SA 8000’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 17 (2), 187–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Golob, U., Podnar, K., Elving, W.J., Nielsen, A.E., Thomsen, C. and Schultz, F. (2013) ‘CSR communication: Quo vadis?’ Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18 (2), 176–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Habisch, A. and Moon, J. (2006) ‘Social capital and corporate social responsibility’, The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, 5, 63–77.Google Scholar
  22. Hess, D. (2001) ‘Regulating corporate social performance: A new look at corporate social accounting, auditing, and reporting’, Business Ethics Quarterly, 11 (2), 307–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Indian Business (IB) (2014) ‘Weekly Economic Bulletin’ – (1 April–7 April) ITP, Division Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India,, accessed 10 May, 2014.
  24. India Companies Act (2013) Insight series – Volume IV corporate social responsibility,, accessed 12 September, 2013.
  25. Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2011) ‘The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting’. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11-100.Google Scholar
  26. Jamali, D., Safieddine, A.M. and Rabbath, M. (2008) ‘Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility synergies and interrelationships’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (5), 443–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jesover, F. and Kirkpatrick, G. (2005) ‘The revised OECD principles of corporate governance and their relevance to non-OECD countries’, Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13 (2), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jiang, R.J. and Bansal, P. (2003) ‘Seeing the need for ISO 14001’, Journal of Management Studies, 40 (4), 1047–1067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kjærgaard, A. and Morsing, M. (2012) A Case Study of How Social Media Guidelines are Used to Discipline Employee Behaviour. 5–7 July, European Group of Organizational Studies (EGOS), Helsinki.Google Scholar
  30. Klettner, A., Clarke, T. and Boersma, M. (2014) ‘The governance of corporate sustainability: Empirical insights into the development, leadership and implementation of responsible business strategy’, Journal of Business Ethics, 122 (1), 145–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Knill, C. and Lehmkuhl, D. (2002) ‘The national impact of European Union regulatory policy: Three europeanization mechanisms’, European Journal of Political Research, 41 (2), 255–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leipziger, D. (2001) SA 8000: The Definitive Guide to the New Social Standard, FT Prentice-Hall, London.Google Scholar
  33. Leipziger, D. (2003) The Corporate Responsibility Code Book, Greenleaf, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  34. Mendoza, X. (1996) Las transformaciones del sector público en las sociedades avanzadas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional. Papers de Formació 23 Diputació de Barcelona.Google Scholar
  35. Michelon, G. and Parbonetti, A. (2012) ‘The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure’, Journal of Management and Governance, 16 (3), 477–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Midttun, A. (2005) ‘Policy making and the role of government. Realigning business, government and civil society. Emerging embedded relational governance beyond the (neo)liberal and welfare state models’, Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 5 (3), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moon, J. and Richardson, J.J. (1985) Unemployment in the UK: Politics and Policies, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
  38. Moon, J. and Sochacki, R. (1996) ‘The social responsibility of business in job and enterprise creation: Motives, means and implications’, Australian Quarterly, 68 (1), 11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mueller, M., Dos Santos, V. and Seuring, S. (2009) ‘The contribution of environmental and social standards towards ensuring legitimacy in supply chain governance’, Journal of Business Ethics, 89 (4), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Newell, P. (2000) ‘Oceans apart? Comparing business responses to the environment in Europe and North America’, Environment, 42 (9), 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Newell, P. (2002) ‘Making Rights Real: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability’, From Responsibility to Citizenship: Corporate Accountability for Development, IDS Bulletin 33 (2), Brighton.Google Scholar
  42. Nielsen, A.E. and Thomsen, C. (2007) ‘Reporting CSR – What and how to say it?’ Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 12 (1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1999) ‘Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Basic Principles of Corporate Governance’,,3343,en_2649_34813_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html, accessed 2 January, 2013.
  44. Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011) ‘Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth’. Harvard Business Review, (January/February), pp. 62–77.Google Scholar
  45. Rasche, A. (2007) The Paradoxical Foundation of Strategic Management, Physica/Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  46. Rasche, A. (2009) ‘Toward a model to compare and analyze accountability standards – The case of the UN global compact’, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16 (4), 192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rasche, A. (2010) ‘Collaborative governance 2.0’, Corporate Governance, 10 (4), 500–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rasche, A. and Esser, D.E. (2006) ‘From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability – Applying habermasian discourse ethics to accountability research’, Journal of Business Ethics, 65 (3), 251–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rasche, A., Baur, D., Van Huijstee, M., Ladek, S. and Naidu, J. (2008) ‘Corporations as political actors – A report on the first Swiss master class in corporate social responsibility’, Journal of Business Ethics, 80 (2), 151–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reynolds, M. and Yuthas, K. (2008) ‘Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting’, Journal of Business Ethics, 78 (1–2), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schoeneborn, D. and Trittin, H. (2013) ‘Transcending transmission: Towards a constitutive perspective on CSR communication’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 18 (2), 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simpson, D., Power, D. and Klassen, R. (2012) ‘When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards’,, accessed 3 May, 2013.
  53. Stenzel, P.L. (2000) ‘Can the ISO 14000 series environmental management standards provide a viable alternative to government regulation?’ American Business Law Journal, 37 (2), 237–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vogel, D. (2005) The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Brookings Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Anthony Camilleri
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Corporate CommunicationUniversity of MaltaMsidaMalta

Personalised recommendations