Valuing Stakeholder Engagement and Sustainability Reporting
- 204 Downloads
This conceptual paper sheds light on some of the major intergovernmental benchmarks, guidelines and principles for corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate governance and sustainability reporting. It reports on several governments’ regulatory roles as their societal governance is intrinsically based on interdependent relationships. There are different actors and drivers who are shaping CSR communications and policies in relational frameworks. This paper mentions some of the countries that have already introduced intelligent substantive and reflexive regulations. It also shows how certain businesses are stepping in with their commitment for sustainability issues as they set their own policies and practices for laudable organisational behaviours. Very often, corporate businesses use non-governmental organisations’ regulatory tools such as process and performance-oriented standards. These regulatory instruments focus on issues such as labour standards, human rights, health and safety, environmental protection, corporate governance and the like. Afterwards, this paper discusses about the relationship between governance and sustainability. It makes reference to some of the relevant European Union Expert Group recommendations for non-financial reporting and CSR audits. Relevant academic contributions are indicating that customers are expecting greater disclosures, accountability and transparency in sustainability reports. This contribution contends that the way forward is to have more proactive governments that raise the profile of CSR. It maintains that CSR communications and stakeholder engagement may bring shared value to business and society. Ultimately, it is in the businesses’ interest to implement corporate sustainability and responsibility and to forge fruitful relationships with key stakeholders, including the regulatory ones, in order to address societal, environmental, governance and economic deficits.
Keywordscorporate governance corporate social responsibility creating shared value CSR regulatory guidelines sustainability sustainability reporting
- Agenda 21 (1992) ‘United Nations sustainable development’, Conference in Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 13 June, http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf, accessed 3 January, 2013.Google Scholar
- Boll, J. (2005) ‘Corporate social responsibility and welfare state institutions’, http://philpapers.org/rec/BOLIAH, accessed 23 January, 2013.
- Bondy, K., Moon, J. and Matten, D. (2012) ‘An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national corporations (MNCs): Form and implications’, Journal of Business Ethics 111(2), 281–299.Google Scholar
- Crane, A. and Matten, D. (2004) Business Ethics: A European Perspective. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Crane, A., Matten, D. and Spence, L.J. (2008) Corporate Social Responsibility: Readings and Cases in Global Context, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
- Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS) (2013) ‘Corporate responsibility: A government update’, http://bis.ecgroup.net/Publications/BusinessLaw/CorporateGovernance/041112.aspx, accessed 3 February, 2013.Google Scholar
- European Union (EU) (2007) National Public Policies in the European Union. Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Enterprise Publications, Brussels.Google Scholar
- European Union (EU) (2011) ‘A renewed EU strategy 2011–14 for corporate social responsibility’, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/public-consultation/index_en.htm, accessed 3 February, 2013.
- European Union (EU) (2012) ‘Sustainable and responsible business European Expert Group on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and SMEs’, http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sustainable-business/corporate-social-responsibility/sme/european-expert-group/index_en.htm, accessed 12 January, 2013.
- European Union (EU) (2014) ‘Non financial reporting’, http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/accounting/non-financial_reporting/index_en.htm, accessed 25 June, 2014.
- Ernst Young (EY) (2013) ‘Corporate social responsibility in India potential to contribute towards inclusive social development Global CSR Summit 2013: An agenda for inclusive growth’, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-Government-and-Public-Sector-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India/$File/EY-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-in-India.pdf, accessed 5 May, 2014.
- Habisch, A. and Moon, J. (2006) ‘Social capital and corporate social responsibility’, The Challenge of Organizing and Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility, 5, 63–77.Google Scholar
- Indian Business (IB) (2014) ‘Weekly Economic Bulletin’ – (1 April–7 April) ITP, Division Ministry of External Affairs, Government of India, http://indiainbusiness.nic.in/newdesign/upload/Publications/Weekly/April/ITP-Weekly-Economic-Bulletin-1st_April_07_April_2014.pdf, accessed 10 May, 2014.
- India Companies Act (2013) Insight series – Volume IV corporate social responsibility, https://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/taxnewsflash/Documents/india-sept20-2013no4companies.pdf, accessed 12 September, 2013.
- Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G. (2011) ‘The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting’. Harvard Business School Research Working Paper 11-100.Google Scholar
- Kjærgaard, A. and Morsing, M. (2012) A Case Study of How Social Media Guidelines are Used to Discipline Employee Behaviour. 5–7 July, European Group of Organizational Studies (EGOS), Helsinki.Google Scholar
- Leipziger, D. (2001) SA 8000: The Definitive Guide to the New Social Standard, FT Prentice-Hall, London.Google Scholar
- Leipziger, D. (2003) The Corporate Responsibility Code Book, Greenleaf, Sheffield.Google Scholar
- Mendoza, X. (1996) Las transformaciones del sector público en las sociedades avanzadas. Del estado del bienestar al estado relacional. Papers de Formació 23 Diputació de Barcelona.Google Scholar
- Midttun, A. (2005) ‘Policy making and the role of government. Realigning business, government and civil society. Emerging embedded relational governance beyond the (neo)liberal and welfare state models’, Corporate Governance: International Journal of Business in Society, 5 (3), 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moon, J. and Richardson, J.J. (1985) Unemployment in the UK: Politics and Policies, Gower, Aldershot.Google Scholar
- Newell, P. (2002) ‘Making Rights Real: Exploring Citizenship, Participation and Accountability’, From Responsibility to Citizenship: Corporate Accountability for Development, IDS Bulletin 33 (2), Brighton.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (1999) ‘Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs. Basic Principles of Corporate Governance’, http://www.oecd.org/document/49/0,3343,en_2649_34813_31530865_1_1_1_1,00.html, accessed 2 January, 2013.
- Porter, M.E. and Kramer, M.R. (2011) ‘Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism - and unleash a wave of innovation and growth’. Harvard Business Review, (January/February), pp. 62–77.Google Scholar
- Rasche, A. (2007) The Paradoxical Foundation of Strategic Management, Physica/Springer, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
- Simpson, D., Power, D. and Klassen, R. (2012) ‘When one size does not fit all: A problem of fit rather than failure for voluntary management standards’, http://www.springerlink.com/content/gn4kg415544l2516/fulltext.pdf, accessed 3 May, 2013.
- Vogel, D. (2005) The Market for Virtue: The Potential and Limits of Corporate Social Responsibility, Brookings Institute, Washington DC.Google Scholar