Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Containing Cause-Related Marketing Skepticism: A Comparison across Donation Frame Types

Corporate Reputation Review volume 19, pages 4–21 (2016)Cite this article

Abstract

This study examines how companies can better manage consumer attributions (ie, perceived company underlying motives) to corporate social responsibility (CSR) through CSR-related communications. Specifically, the article focuses on cause-related marketing (CRM) initiatives and investigates how different types of CRM donation frames influence consumers’ perceptions of a company’s motivation to support a social cause. Drawing from the psychology of money and CSR literature, the article finds that the in-kind CRM donation frame works best at reducing consumers’ causal attributions of companies’ self-centered motives.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  • Banerjee, S.B. (2008) ‘Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly’, Critical Sociology, 34 (1), 51–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M.J., Miyazaki, A.D. and Taylor, K.A. (2000) ‘The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another?’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (2), 248–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barone, M.J., Norman, A.T. and Miyazaki, A.D. (2007) ‘Consumer response to retailer use of cause-related marketing: Is more fit better?’, Journal of Retailing, 83 (4), 437–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, C.W. and Skitka, L.J. (2012) ‘Corporate social responsibility as a source of employee satisfaction’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 63–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berglind, M. and Nakata, C. (2005) ‘Cause-related marketing: More buck than bang?’, Business Horizons, 48 (5), 443–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya, C.B., Sen, S. and Korschun, D. (2011) Leveraging Corporate Responsibility: The Stakeholder Route to Maximizing Business and Social Value, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-T. (2008) ‘To donate or not to donate? Product characteristics and framing effects of cause-related marketing on consumer purchase behavior’, Psychology & Marketing, 25 (12), 1089–1110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G.W. and Rensvold, R.B. (2002) ‘Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance’, Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9 (2), 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C.B. and Sen, S. (2010) ‘Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication’, International Journal of Management Reviews, 12 (1), 8–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eikenberry, A.M. (2009) ‘The hidden costs of cause marketing’, Stanford Social Innovation Review, 7 (3), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, S.P., Mohr, L.A. and Webb, D.J. (2000) ‘Charitable programs and the retailer: Do they mix?’, Journal of Retailing, 76 (3), 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellen, S.P., Webb, D.J. and Mohr, L.A. (2006) ‘Building corporate associations: Consumer attributions for corporate socially responsible programs’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., Roberts, J. and Garsten, C. (2013) ‘In search of corporate social responsibility: Introduction to special issue’, Organization, 20 (3), 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folse, J.A.G., Niedrich, R.W. and Grau, S.L. (2010) ‘Cause-relating marketing: The effects of purchase quantity and firm donation amount on consumer inferences and participation intentions’, Journal of Retailing, 86 (4), 295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) ‘Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error’, Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, R.H., Gilovich, T. and Regan, D.T. (1993) ‘Does studying economics inhibit cooperation’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, D. (2008) ‘Just good business: A special report on corporate social responsibility’, The Economist, 17 January, pp. 1–24.

  • Frieswick, K. (2009) ‘Sick of pink’. Boston Globe, 4 October, pp. 29–31.

  • Frynas, J.G. (2005) ‘The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies’, International Affairs, 81 (3), 581–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, D.T. and Malone, P.S. (1995) ‘The correspondence bias’, Psychological Bulletin, 117 (1), 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, N.J., Griskevicius, V. and Cialdini, R.B. (2011) ‘Reciprocity by proxy: A novel influence strategy for stimulating cooperation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 56 (3), 441–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, S.L. and Folse, J.A.G. (2007) ‘Cause-related marketing (CRM): The influence of donation proximity and message framing cues on the less-involved consumer’, Journal of Advertising, 36 (4), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grau, S.L., Folse, J.A.G. and Pirsch, J. (2007) ‘Cause-related marketing: An exploratory study of campaign donation structure issues’, Journal of Nonprofit and Public Sector Marketing, 18 (2), 69–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillenbrand, C., Money, K. and Ghobadian, A. (2011) ‘Unpacking the mechanism by which corporate responsibility impacts stakeholder relationships’, British Journal of Management, 24 (1), 127–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ΙEG (2015) ‘Sponsorship spending report: Where the dollars are going and trends for 2015 [Electronic Version]’, IEG Sponsorship Report, http://www.sponsorship.com/IEG/files/4e/4e525456-b2b1-4049-bd51-03d9c35ac507.pdf, accessed 1 July.

  • Keen, C., Wetzels, M., Ruyter, K.D. and Feinberg, R. (2004) ‘E-tailers versus retailers: Which factors determine consumers’ preferences’, Journal of Business Research, 57 (7), 685–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A.H. and Das, N. (2013) ‘Thinking about fit and donation format in cause marketing: The effects of need for cognition’, Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 21 (1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kervyn, N., Fiske, S.T. and Malone, C. (2012) ‘Brands as intentional agents framework: How perceived intentions and ability can map brand perception’, Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22 (2), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Reeves, M. and Goh, E. (2013) ‘The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation’, MIT Sloan Management Review, 54 (2), 69–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschate-Fischer, N., Stefan, I.V. and Hoyer, W.D. (2012) ‘Willingness to pay for cause-related marketing: The impact of donation amount and moderating effects’, Journal of Marketing Research, 49 (6), 910–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. and Rajan, U. (2009) ‘Cause marketing: Spillover effects of cause-related products in a product portfolio’, Management Science, 55 (9), 1469–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenstein, D.R., Drumwright, M.E. and Braig, B.M. (2004) ‘The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits’, Journal of Marketing, 68 (4), 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, T.D. (1997) ‘Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Practical and theoretical issues’, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32 (1), 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, G. and Ko, W.-W. (2011) ‘An analysis of cause-related marketing implementation strategies through social alliance: Partnership conditions and strategic objectives’, Journal of Business Ethics, 100 (2), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B. and Joreskog, K.G. (1971) ‘Factorial invariance of ability measures in groups differing in intelligence and socioeconomic status’, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 24 (2), 154–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales, A.C. (2005) ‘Giving firms an “e” for effort: Consumer responses to high effort firms’, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (4), 806–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, S.S., Fries, A.J. and Gedenk, K. (2013) ‘How much to give? The effect of donation size on tactical and strategic success in cause-related marketing’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31 (2), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polonsky, M.J. and Speed, R. (2001) ‘Linking sponsorship and cause related marketing: Complementarities and conflicts’, European Journal of Marketing, 35 (11/12), 1361–1385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pracejus, J.W., Olsen, D. and Brown, N.R. (2003) ‘On the prevalence and impact of vague quantifiers in the advertising of cause-related marketing (CRM)’, Journal of Advertising, 32 (4), 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, A., Aquino, K. and Levy, E. (2007) ‘Moral identity and judgments of charitable behaviors’, Journal of Marketing, 71 (1), 178–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.R., Irmak, C. and Jayachandran, S. (2012) ‘Choice of cause in cause-related marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 76 (4), 126–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, L., Johnstone-Louis, M. and Dolan, C. (2011) Pampers and UNICEF Part 1: The Marketing Campaign [Case Study], Saïd Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh, S. and Beise-Zee, R. (2011) ‘Corporate social responsibility or cause-related marketing? The role of cause specificity of CSR’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28 (1), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdeshmukh, D., Singh, J. and Sabol, B. (2002) ‘Consumer trust, value, and loyalty in relational exchanges’, Journal of Marketing, 66 (1), 5–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahilevitz, M. and Myers, J.G. (1998) ‘Donations to charity as purchase incentives: How well they work may depend on what you are trying to sell’, Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 434–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, E. (2009) ‘For causes, it’s a tougher sell’. The New York Times, 11 November, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/12/giving/12BUY.html, accessed 29 May, 2014.

  • Tangari, A., Folse, J., Burton, S. and Kees, J. (2010) ‘The moderating influence of consumers’ temporal orientation on the framing of societal needs and corporate responses in cause-related marketing campaigns’, Journal of Advertising, 39 (2), 35–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, L.R. and Lewis, C. (1973) ‘A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis’, Psychometrics, 38 (1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., Reast, J. and Popering, N. (2012) ‘To do well by doing good: Improving corporate image through cause-related marketing’, Journal of Business Ethics, 109 (3), 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P.R. and Menon, A. (1988) ‘Cause-related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy’, Journal of Marketing, 52 (3), 58–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P.A., Panagopoulos, N.G. and Rapp, A.A. (2014) ‘Employee judgments of and behaviors toward corporate social responsibility: A multi-study investigation of direct, cascading, and moderating effects’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35 (7), 990–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P.A., Tsamakos, A., Vrechopoulos, A.P. and Avramidis, P.K. (2009) ‘Corporate social responsibility: Attributions, loyalty, and the mediating role of trust’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (2), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlachos, P.A., Theotokis, A. and Panagopoulos, N.G. (2010) ‘Sales force reactions to corporate social responsibility: Attributions, outcomes, and the mediating role of organizational trust’, Industrial Marketing Management, 39 (7), 1207–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vohs, K.D., Mead, N.L. and Goode, M.R. (2006) ‘The psychological consequences of money’, Science, 314 (5802), 1154–1156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, T., Lutz, R.J. and Weitz, B.A. (2009) ‘Corporate hypocrisy: Overcoming the threat of inconsistent corporate social responsibility perceptions’, Journal of Marketing, 73 (6), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, G., Mitchell, V.-W., Jackson, P.R. and Beatty, S.E. (2009) ‘Examining the antecedents and consequences of corporate reputation: A customer perspective’, British Journal of Management, 20 (2), 187–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webley, P. and Wilson, R. (1989) ‘Social relationships and the unacceptability of money as a gift’, Journal of Social Psychology, 129 (1), 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ALBA Graduate Business School at the American College of Greece, Athens, Greece

    Pavlos A Vlachos

  2. ALBA Graduate Business School at the American College of Greece, Athens, Greece

    Christos D Koritos

  3. DEREE Graduate School, The American College of Greece, Athens, Greece

    Areti Krepapa

  4. DEREE Graduate School, The American College of Greece, Athens, Greece

    Konstantinos Tasoulis

  5. INSEEC Business School, Paris, France

    Ioannis G Theodorakis

Authors
  1. Pavlos A Vlachos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christos D Koritos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Areti Krepapa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Konstantinos Tasoulis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ioannis G Theodorakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix A

Table A1

Table A1 Scenarios Used in the Study
Full size table

Appendix B

Table B1

Table B1 Scales
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vlachos, P., Koritos, C., Krepapa, A. et al. Containing Cause-Related Marketing Skepticism: A Comparison across Donation Frame Types. Corp Reputation Rev 19, 4–21 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.23

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2015.23

Keywords

search

Navigation