Contemporary Political Theory

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 38–57 | Cite as

Adhocracy, security and responsibility: Revisiting Abu Ghraib a decade later

  • Bernardo Zacka
Article
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

This article examines the acts of detainee abuse that took place at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq from the standpoint of organization theory. Instead of seeing Abu Ghraib as a failure of bureaucracy, I show that the prison is emblematic of a different organizational model – adhocracy – that places greater emphasis on the delegation of improvisation and practical judgment to low-level operators. I argue that that there is an intimate connection between adhocracies and the kind of security apparatus put in place by Coalition forces in Iraq, that the space of their encounter is potentially dangerous, and that adhocracies demand a distinctive approach to questions of individual responsibility.

Keywords

bureaucracy adhocracy responsibility security Abu Ghraib 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Earlier versions of this article were presented at conferences at Harvard, UCLA, Columbia and Notre-Dame. For their helpful comments and criticism, I thank Tal Arbel, Steven Caton, Prithvi Datta, Michael Frazer, Sean Ingham, Pablo Kalmanovitz, Matthew Landauer, Yascha Mounk, Oded Na’aman, Melodie Chika Ogawa, Sabeel Rahman, Michael Rosen, Nancy Rosenblum, Elaine Scarry and Andrea Tivig. I am also grateful to Samuel Chambers and two anonymous reviewers at Contemporary Political Theory.

References

  1. Agamben, G. (2005) State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (2011) Population and affective perception: Biopolitics and anticipatory action in US counterinsurgency doctrine. Antipode 43 (2): 205–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aradau, C., Lobo-Guerrero, L. and Van Munster, R. (2008) Security, technologies of risk, and the political. Security Dialogue 39 (2–3): 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belkin, A. (2012) Bring Me Men: Military Masculinity and the Benign Facade of American Empire, 1898–2001. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  5. Bigo, D. and Tsoukala, A. (2008) Terror, Insecurity and Liberty: Illiberal Practices of Liberal Regimes after 9/11. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Booth, K. (2007) Theory of World Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Buzan, B., Waever, O. and Wilde, J.D. (1998) Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Pub.Google Scholar
  8. Caton, S.C. and Zacka, B. (2010) Abu Ghraib, the security apparatus, and the performativity of power. American Ethnologist 37 (2): 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Danner, M. (2004) Torture and Truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the War on Terror. New York: New York Review of Books.Google Scholar
  10. Dillon, M. and Lobo-Guerrero, L. (2008) Biopolitics of security in the 21st century: An introduction. Review of International Studies 34 (2): 265–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Doris, J.M. and Murphy, D. (2007) From My Lai to Abu Ghraib: The moral psychology of atrocity. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 31 (1): 25–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunn, E.C. and Cons, J. (2014) Aleatory sovereignty and the rule of sensitive spaces. Antipode 46 (1): 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenman, S.F. (2007) The Abu Ghraib Effect. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, B. (2010) Foucault’s legacy: Security, war and violence in the 21st century. Security Dialogue 41 (4): 413–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fassin, D.A. (2013) Enforcing Order: An Ethnography of Urban Policing. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fay, M.G.G.R. (2004) AR 15-6 Investigation of the Abu Ghraib Detention Facility and 205th Military Intelligence Brigade. Investigation for the U.S. Army Combined Joint Task Force.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977–78. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Gourevitch, P. and Morris, E. (2008) Standard Operating Procedure. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  20. Graveline, C. and Clemens, M. (2010) The Secrets of Abu Ghraib Revealed: American Soldiers on Trial. Washington DC: Potomac Books.Google Scholar
  21. Hedberg, B.L.T., Nystrom, P.C. and Starbuck, W.H. (1976) Camping on seesaws: Prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Administrative Science Quarterly 21 (1): 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hersh, S.M. (2004) Chain of Command: The Road from 9/11 to Abu Ghraib. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  23. Huysmans, J. (2006) The Politics of Insecurity: Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Krause, K. and Williams, M.C. (1996) Broadening the agenda of security studies: Politics and methods. Mershon International Studies Review 40 (2): 229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krulak, C.C. (1999) The strategic corporal: Leadership in the Three Block War. Marines 28 (1): 26.Google Scholar
  26. Lipsky, M. (2010) Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  27. Mayer, J. (2008) The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  28. Mintzberg, H. and Mchugh, A. (1985) Strategy formation in an adhocracy. Administrative Science Quarterly 30 (2): 160–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mitchell, W.J.T. (2005) The unspeakable and the unimaginable: Word and image in a time of terror. ELH 72 (2): 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Na’aman, O. (2012) The checkpoint: Terror, power, and cruelty. Boston Review 37 (4): 38–45.Google Scholar
  31. Peoples, C. and Vaughan-Williams, N. (2010) Critical Security Studies: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Scheuerman, W.E. (2008) Torture and the new paradigm of warfare. Constellations 15 (4): 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schooner, S. (2005) Contractor atrocities at Abu Ghraib: Compromised accountability in a streamlined, outsourced government. Standford Law and Policy Review 16 (2): 549–572.Google Scholar
  34. Senate Armed Services Committee (2008) United States Congress (110th Cong., 2nd sess.), Senate Armed Services Committee, Report: Inquiry into the Treatment of Detainees in U.S. Custody.Google Scholar
  35. Simon, H. (1976) Administrative Behavior. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  36. Singer, P.W. (2005) Outsourcing war. Foreign Affairs 84 (2): 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Spire, A. (2008) Accueillir ou Reconduire: Enquête sur les Guichets de l’Immigration. Paris: Raisons d’Agir.Google Scholar
  38. Sussman, D. (2005) What’s wrong with torture? Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taguba, A. (2004) 15–6 Investigation of the 800th Military Police Brigade (Taguba Report).Google Scholar
  40. Weber, M. (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretative Sociology. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  41. Weber, M. (1979) Bureaucracy. In: H.H. Gerth and C.W. Mills (eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Williamson, O.E. (1981) The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilson, J.Q. (1989) Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  44. Yoo, J. (2003) Re: Military interrogation of alien unlawful combatants held outside the United States. Memorandum issued by the Office of Legal Counsel, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
  45. Zimbardo, P. (2007) The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bernardo Zacka
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GovernmentHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations