Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Designing in crime prevention, designing out ambiguity: Practice issues with the CPTED knowledge framework available to professionals in the field and its potentially ambiguous nature.

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Crime Prevention and Community Safety Aims and scope

Abstract

Crime prevention in the design of an urban setting displays unambiguous links with behavioural geography, the urban setting and development of sustainable communities, being a strategy that has been extant for over 40 years. This article examines how such strategies have been able to develop (or not) within the design of our environments and undertakes ground breaking analysis of academic input jointly with the response of professional practice. Systematic literature analysis and questionnaire responses from professionals in the field extracted a sizeable and diverse number of conflicting terms used to label Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED) concepts in both academia and professional practice policies. Realising damaging transferability issues and extreme diversity in the understanding and use of CPTED frameworks between research and practice, this research exposes the risk to the sustainability and integrity of the crime prevention response by design to the human use of space. Frameworks from academic literature and professional policies were analysed evidencing the lack of a universally accepted framework and terminology set throughout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angel, S. (1968) Discouraging Crime through City Planning. Berkeley, CA: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. (2007) Sustainability versus safety: Confusion, conflict and contradiction in designing out crime. In: G. Farrell, K. Bowers, S. Johnson and M. Townsley (eds.) Imagination for Crime Prevention. Crime Prevention Studies. Vol. 21. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 81–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage, R. and Monchuck, L. (2009) Reconciling security with sustainability: The challenge for eco-homes. Built Environment 35 (3): 308–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atlas, R. (1990) Offensible space: Law and order obstruction through environmental design. Paper presented at the The Human Factors Society Annual Meeting, Orlando, FL.

  • Bickman, L., Maltz, M. and Lavrakas, P. (1978) The Evaluation of Crime Prevention through Environmental Design Programmes. Evanston, IL: Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A. (1981) The built environment as a crime deterrent: A reexamination of defensible space. Criminology 18 (4): 557–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandola, T. (2001) The fear of crime and area differences in health. Health & Place 7 (2): 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P.M. (2007) Planning, crime and urban sustainability. In: A. Kungolas, C. Brebbia and E. Beriatos (eds.) Sustainable Development and Planning III. Vol. 1, WIT transactions on ecology and the environment. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, pp. 187–196.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P.M. (2008) Crime prevention through environmental design in Western Australia: Planning for sustainable futures. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning 3 (3): 272–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P.M. (2011) Urban planning and environmental criminology: Towards a new perspective for safer cities. Planning Practice & Research 26 (4): 481–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cozens, P., Saville, G. and Hillier, D. (2005) Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): A review and modern bibliography. Property Management 23 (5): 328–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, T.D. (2000) Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. 2nd edn. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, D. (1994) Fortress America: More and more of us are living behind locked gates. Planning 60 (6): 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Plessis, C. (1999) The links between crime prevention and sustainable development. Open House International 24 (1): 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2009) Redesigning the language and concepts of crime prevention through environmental design. Reconstructing CPTED, 30 October 2010, http://reconstructcpted.wordpress.com/publications-and-other-papers/, accessed 21 September 2012.

  • Ekblom, P. (2011a) Guest editors introduction. European Journal of Criminal Policy Research 17 (1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekblom, P. (2011b) Deconstructing CPTED… and reconstructing it for practice, knowledge management and research. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research 17 (1): 7–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frohman, J.G., Hanes, L.F. and Kohn, I.R. (1977) A Special Report: Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. In Nation’s Cities by National League of Cities. Washington DC: US Department of Justice.

  • Great Britain. Office of Deputy Prime Minister & The Home Office (2004) Safer Places: The Planning System & Crime Prevention. London: The Stationery Office.

  • Gamman, L. and Thorpe, A. (2009) Less is more: What design against crime can contribute to sustainability. Built Environment 35 (3): 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, V. and Johnson, D. (2013) CPTED, but not as we know it: Investigating the conflict of frameworks and terminology in crime prevention through environmental design. Security Journal. advance online publication, 13 May, doi: 10.1057/sj.2013.19.

  • Green, G., Gilbertson, J.M. and Grimsley, M.F.J. (2002) Fear of crime and health in residential tower blocks: A case study in Liverpool, UK. The European Journal of Public Health 12 (101): 10–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Great Britain, Office of Deputy Prime Minister (2004) Safer Places: The Planning System and Crime Prevention. London: The Stationery Office.

  • Hillier, B. (1973) In defense of space. RIBA Journal 11: 539–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (2004) Can streets be made safe? Urban Design International 9 (1): 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, H.E. (1920) Territory in Bird Life. New York: E.P. Dutton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hseih, H. and Shannon, S.E. (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research 15 (9): 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. and Stafford, M. (2009) Public health and fear of crime: A prospective cohort study. British Journal of Criminology 49 (6): 832–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961) Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery, C.R. and Zahm, D.L. (1993) Crime prevention through environmental design, opportunity theory and rational choice models. In: R.V. Clarke and M. Felson (eds.) Routine Activity and Rational Choice. Advances in Criminological Theory. Vol. 5. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H.M., Palkovitz, L.H. and Pesce, E.J. (1978) Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Final Report on Residential Demonstration Minneapolis. Minnesota. Arlington, VA: Westinghouse Electric Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen, T (2009) Crime prevention, the planning system, and sustainable development: Addressing policy challenges in English practice. Built Environment 35 (3): 328–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landman, K. and Liebermann, S. (2005) Planning against crime, preventing crime with people not barriers. SA Crime Quarterly 11 (March): 21–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larimian, T., Zarabadi, Z. and Sadegh, A. (2013) Developing a fuzzy AHP model to evaluate environmental sustainability from the perspective of Secured by design scheme – A case study. Sustainable Cities and Society 7: 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Le Goix, R. (2005) Gated communities: Sprawl and social segregation in Southern California. Housing Studies 20 (2): 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marzbali, M., Abdullah, A., Razak, N. and Tilaki, M. (2011) A review of the effectiveness of crime prevention by design approaches towards sustainable development. Journal of Sustainable Development 4 (1): 160–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1972) Defensible Space: People and Design in the Violent City. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsen, D.J. (2013) Crime and Planning: Building Socially Sustainable Communities. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M.B. (1996) The theoretical development of “CPTED”: 25 years of responses to C. Ray Jeffery. In: W. Laufer and F. Adler (eds.) Advances in Criminological Theory. Vol. 8. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2007) Design against crime? Beyond the rhetoric of residential crime prevention. Property Management 5 (2): 146–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stafford, M., Chandola, T. and Marmot, M. (2007) Association between fear of crime and mental health and physical functioning. American Journal of Public Health 97 (11): 2076–2081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (2003) Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED): Yes, no, maybe, unkowable, and all of the above. In: R. Bechtel and A. Churchman (eds.) Handbook of Environmental Pyschology. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijerino, R. (1998) Civil spaces: A critical perspective of defensible space. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 15 (4): 321–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. (1961) Housing Design, a Social Theory. New York: Citizens’ Housing and Planning Council.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks for the financial support from Concept Building Services (Southern) Ltd who have generously provided funding for all aspects of this research project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Geography Department, Northumbria University, Ellison Building, Ellison Place, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 8ST, United Kingdom

    Derek Johnson, Victoria Gibson & Megan McCabe

Authors
  1. Derek Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Victoria Gibson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Megan McCabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derek Johnson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnson, D., Gibson, V. & McCabe, M. Designing in crime prevention, designing out ambiguity: Practice issues with the CPTED knowledge framework available to professionals in the field and its potentially ambiguous nature.. Crime Prev Community Saf 16, 147–168 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2014.3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cpcs.2014.3

Keywords

Search

Navigation