Advertisement

Crime Prevention and Community Safety

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 38–53 | Cite as

Key stakeholder views of venue lockouts in Newcastle and Geelong

  • Peter Miller
  • Darren Palmer
  • Emma McFarlane
  • Ashlee Curtis
Original Article

Abstract

A substantial proportion of the problems associated with alcohol and interpersonal violence arise in or around licensed premises. One intervention, called lockouts, involves stopping people entering venues at an allocated time (for example, 1:30 am), although the venue can continue to sell alcohol until a specified closing time (for example, 3:30 am). The current study examines perceptions of the effectiveness of lockouts as a means of controlling violence in and around licensed premises. This article focuses on the views of key stakeholders drawn from industry, policing agencies and other key stakeholders using in-depth qualitative interviews (n=97) in two Australian regional cities. The data was analysed using thematic analysis. While a majority of interviewees believed lockouts were ineffective, thematic analysis highlighted six additional areas of consideration: the reasons for implementing lockouts; the impact on police resources; the benefits in changing patron behaviour; the limits to lockouts; the need for jurisdictional and/or market consistency; and the unintended consequences arising from the use of lockouts. Two additional findings raise important crime prevention and community safety policy considerations. First, lockouts favoured large venues that closed late rather than smaller, earlier closing venues. Second, concerns were raised about the potential for a lockout to cause an increase in alcohol-related harm by channelling patrons to larger, later closing venues and/or increasing the number of late-night trading venues by creating conditions that forced smaller venues to close or trade later in order to remain viable business. The article concludes by suggesting that crime prevention and community safety policy development needs to consider the potential harms that might arise from well intentioned but hasty desires to ‘do something now’.

Keywords

alcohol licensed venues bars violence lockouts trading hours restrictions 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The National Drug Law Enforcement Research Fund, funded by the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, funded this research. Jennifer Tindall, Karen Gillham, Amy Sawyer and Professor John Wiggers assisted with identification and recruitment of potential interviewees in Newcastle. We would also like the thanks the two anonymous referees who made detailed and insightful comments that improved the final article.

References

  1. Babor, T. et al (2010) Alcohol: No Ordinary Commodity – Research and Public Policy. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleetman, A., Perry, C., Crawford, R. and Swann, I. (1997) Effect of Strathclyde police initiative operation blade on accident and emergency attendances due to assault. Journal of Accident and Emergency Medicine 14 (3): 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chikritzhs, T. and Stockwell, T. (2002) The impact of later trading hours for Australian public houses (hotels) on levels of violence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 63 (5): 591–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chikritzhs, T. and Stockwell, T. (2006) The impact of later trading hours for hotels on levels of impaired driver road crashes and driver breath alcohol levels. Addiction 101 (9): 1254–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chikritzhs, T. and Stockwell, T. (2007) The impact of later trading hours for hotels (public houses) on breath alcohol levels of apprehended impaired drivers. Addiction 102 (10): 1609–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chikritzhs, T. et al (2003) Australian Alcohol Indicators: Patterns of Alcohol Use and Related Harms for Australian States and Territories 1990–2001. Melbourne, Australia: National Drug Research Institute and Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.Google Scholar
  7. Chikritzhs, T., Gray, D., Lyons, Z. and Saggers, S. (2007) Restrictions on the Sale and Supply of Alcohol: Evidence and Outcomes. Perth, WA: National Drug Research Institute, Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
  8. Clannell, A. (2012) Lockouts prove key to curbing violence. The Daily Telegraph. 5 August.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, D.J. and Lapsley, H.M. (2008) The Costs of Tobacco, Alcohol and Illicit Drug Abuse to Australian Society in 2004/05. Vol. 30. Canberra, Australia: Australian Government.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietze, P.M., McElwee, P., Heale, P., Jonas, H., Hanlin, K. and Cvetkovski, S. (2001) The Victorian Alcohol Statistics Handbook (Volume 2): Alcohol-Related Serious Road Injury and Assault in Victoria, 1992–1999. Fitzroy, Victoria: Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre.Google Scholar
  11. Farrell, A., McDevitt, J. and Buerger, M.E. (2002) Moving police and community dialogues forward through data collection task forces. Police Quarterly 5 (3): 359–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Felson, M., Berends, R., Richardson, B. and Veno, A. (1997) Reducing pub hopping and related crime. In: R. Homel (ed.) Policing for Prevention: Reducing Crime, Public Intoxication and Injury. New York: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 115–132.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, K. (1985) Determinants of heavy drinking and drinking problems: The contribution of the bar environment. In: E. Single and T. Storm (eds.) Public Drinking and Public Policy. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, pp. 71–84.Google Scholar
  14. Graham, K. (2009) They fight because we let them! Applying a situational crime prevention model to barroom violence. Drug and Alcohol Review 28 (2): 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Graham, K. and Homel, R. (2008) Raising the Bar: Preventing Aggression in and around Bars, Pubs and Clubs. Crime Science Series London: Willan.Google Scholar
  16. Gruenewald, P.J. and Remer, L. (2006) Changes in outlet densities affect violence rates. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 30 (7): 1184–1193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansen, J. (2011) Police make call for pub lockouts. The Sunday Telegraph. 20 November.Google Scholar
  18. Herzig, M. (1998) Starting a new conversation: When debate is fruitless. Dispute Resolution Magazine (Summer): 10–13.Google Scholar
  19. Homel, R., Carvolth, R., Hauritz, M., McIlwain, G. and Teague, R. (2004) Making licensed venues safer for patrons: What environmental factors should be the focus of interventions? Drug and Alcohol Review 23 (1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, C., Kypri, K., Moffatt, S., Borzycki, C. and Price, B. (2009) The Impact of Restricted Alcohol Availability on Alcohol-Related Violence in Newcastle, NSW. Newcastle, UK: NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.Google Scholar
  21. Kellehear, A. (1993) The Unobtrusive Researcher: A Guide to Methods. St Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  22. Kelling, G.L. and Wilson, J.Q. (1982) Broken windows. Atlantic Monthly 249 (3): 29–38.Google Scholar
  23. KPMG (2008) Evaluation of the Temporary Late Night Entry Lockout. Melbourne, Australia: Department of Justice Victoria.Google Scholar
  24. Kypri, K., Jones, C., McElduff, P. and Barker, D. (2011) Effects of restricting pub closing times on night-time assaults in an Australian city. Addiction 106 (2): 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Livingston, M. (2008) A longitudinal analysis of alcohol outlet density and assault. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 32 (6): 1074–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Livingston, M., Matthews, S., Barratt, M.J., Lloyd, B. and Room, R. (2010) Diverging trends in alcohol consumption and alcohol-related harm in Victoria. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 34 (4): 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mazerolle, L., White, G., Ransley, J. and Ferguson, P. (2012) Violence in and around entertainment districts: A longitudinal analysis of the impact of late-night lockout legislation. Law and Policy 34 (1): 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, P.G., Sonderlund, A., Coomber, K. and McKenzie, S. (2012a) The long-term effect of lockouts on alcohol-related emergency department attendances within Ballarat, Australia. Drug and Alcohol Review 31 (4): 370–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, P. et al (2012b) Dealing with Alcohol-Related Harm in the Night-Time Economy. Canberra, Australia: National Drug Law Enforcement Funds, Monograph Series No 43, April.Google Scholar
  30. Molloy, M., McDonald, J., McLaren, S. and Harvey, J. (2004) Operation Link: Be Safe Late Program. Ballaarat, Australia: Centre for Health Research and Practice, University of Ballarat.Google Scholar
  31. Nicolaou, P. (2012) Key to Kings Cross violence policing, not lock-outs. The Daily Telegraph. 6 August.Google Scholar
  32. Palk, G., Davey, J. and Freeman, J. (2010) The impact of a lockout policy on levels of alcohol-related incidents in and around licensed premises. Police Practice and Research 11 (1): 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Palmer, D., Warren, I. and Miller, P. (2012) ID scanner, the media and the politics of urban surveillance in an Australian regional city. Surveillance & Society 9 (3): 293–309.Google Scholar
  34. Pope, C. and Mays, N. (1995) Qualitative research: Reaching the parts other methods cannot reach: An introduction to qualitative methods in health and health services research. British Medical Journal 311 (6996): 42–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rhodes, T. and Coomber, R. (2010) Qualitative methods and theory in addictions research. In: P.G. Miller, J. Strang and P.M. Miller (eds.) Addiction Research Methods. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Roncek, D.W. and Maier, P.A. (1991) Bars, blocks, and crimes revisited: Linking the theory of routine activities to the empiricism of hot spots. Criminology 29 (4): 725–753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Scott, M. and Lyman, S. (1968) Accounts. American Sociological Review 33 (1): 46–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stenius, K., Mäkelä, K., Miovsky, M. and Gabrhelik, R. (2008) How to write publishable qualitative research. In: T.F. Babor, K. Stenius and S. Savva (eds.) Publishing Addiction Science: A Guide for the Perplexed. 2nd edn. International Society of Addiction Journal Editors. Rockville, MD: International Society of Addiction Journal Editors, pp. 82–97.Google Scholar
  39. Stockwell, T. and Chikritzhs, T. (2009) Do relaxed trading hours for bars and clubs mean more relaxed drinking? A review of international research on the impacts of changes to permitted hours of drinking. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 11 (3): 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Townsley, M. and Grimshaw, R. (2013) The consequences of queueing: Crowding, situational features and aggression in entertainment precincts. Crime Prevention and Community Safety 15 (1): 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vingilis, E., McLeod, A.I., Mann, R. and Seeley, J. (2008) A tale of two cities: The effect of extended drinking hours in licensed establishments on impaired driving and assault charges. Traffic Injury Prevention 9 (6): 527–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Miller
    • 1
  • Darren Palmer
    • 2
  • Emma McFarlane
    • 2
  • Ashlee Curtis
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Psychology, Deakin UniversityGeelongAustralia
  2. 2.School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University, GeelongAustralia

Personalised recommendations