Advertisement

Comparative Economic Studies

, Volume 58, Issue 3, pp 317–334 | Cite as

What Role for Financial Supervisors in Addressing Environmental Risks?

  • Dirk Schoenmaker
  • Rens Van Tilburg
Symposium Article

Abstract

A literature is rapidly developing on financial shocks originating from ecological imbalances. These shocks can be triggered by either intensified environmental policies, clean tech breakthroughs or due to the economic costs of crossing ecological boundaries. However, financial supervisors have so far given little attention to this ecological dimension. This allows systemic financial imbalances resulting from ecological pressures to build up and concentrate in financial institutions and markets. This paper sketches the ecological dimension of the prudential policy framework and illustrates the working for the case of carbon emissions.

Keywords

prudential policy financial supervision environmental policies 

JEL Classifications

E58 G28 H23 H41 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Daniel Gros, Lex Hoogduin, Clemens Kool, Christian Kopf, Evan Kraft, Arjen Siegmann, Peter Wierts, Simon Zadek, the members of the Sustainable Finance Lab, and the editor, Paul Wachtel, for stimulating discussions and useful suggestions. This paper was presented at the Design Options for a Sustainable Financial System conference organized by the Centre for International Governance Innovation and the UNEP Enquiry into the Design of a Sustainable Financial System, 1–3 December 2014, Waterloo, Canada, and at the Twenty-First Dubrovnik Economic Conference, 7–9 June 2015, Dubrovnik, Croatia.

References

  1. Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC). 2016: Too late, too sudden: Transition to a low-carbon economy and systemic risk. Report No. 6 of the Advisory Scientific Committee of the European Systemic Risk Board: Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  2. Allianz, SE. 2015: Climate protection will become part of core business. Press release, 26 November, Munich.Google Scholar
  3. Bank of England. 2015: One bank research agenda. Discussion Paper, London.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, D and Wiseman, M. 2014: Focusing capital on the long term. Harvard Business Review 92(1/2): 44–51.Google Scholar
  5. Bauer, R, Koedijk, K and Otten, R. 2005: International evidence on ethical mutual fund performance and investment style. Journal of Banking and Finance 29: 1751–1767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Borio, C, Drehmann, M and Tsatsaronis, K. 2014: Stress-testing macro stress testing: Does it live up to expectations? Journal of Financial Stability 12: 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carbon Tracker. 2011: Unburnable carbon – Are the world’s financial markets carrying a carbon bubble? London.Google Scholar
  8. De Haan, J, Oosterloo, S and Schoenmaker, D. 2015: Financial markets and institutions: A European perspective, 3rd Edition. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  9. Diamond, J. 2005: Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed. Viking; Penguin Group: New York.Google Scholar
  10. Dietz, S and Stern, N. 2015: Endogenous growth, convexity of damage and climate risk: How Nordhaus’ framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions. The Economic Journal 125(583): 574–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elderson, F. 2015: Speech at the sustainable finance seminar. 27 November, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  12. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2012: Towards the circular economy: Economic and business rationale for an accelerated transition. Cowes, UK.Google Scholar
  13. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2013: Towards the circular economy: Opportunities for the consumer goods sector. Cowes, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. 2014: Towards the circular economy: Accelerating the scale-up across global supply chains. Cowes, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Financial Stability Board. 2015: FSB to establish task force on climate-related financial disclosures. Press Release, 4 December, Basel.Google Scholar
  16. Global Carbon Project. 2014: Global carbon budget 2014. September.Google Scholar
  17. Graham, JR, Harvey, CR and Rajagopal, S. 2005: The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 40(1): 3–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Green Finance Task Force. 2015: Establishing China’s green financial system. People’s Bank of China: Beijing.Google Scholar
  19. Haldane, AG. 2014: Managing global finance as a system. Bank of England, Speech at the Maxwell Fry Annual Global Finance Lecture, Birmingham University, 29 October.Google Scholar
  20. HSBC Global Research. 2012: Coal and carbon stranded assets: Assessing the risk. London.Google Scholar
  21. HSBC Global Research. 2013: Oil & carbon revisited: Value at risk from ‘unburnable’ reserves. London.Google Scholar
  22. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014: Fifth assessment synthesis report. New York.Google Scholar
  23. Jevons, S. 1884: Investigations in currency and finance. Palgrave Macmillan: London.Google Scholar
  24. KPMG. 2012: Expect the unexpected: Building business value in a changing world. London.Google Scholar
  25. KPMG. 2014: A new vision of value: Connecting corporate and societal value creation. London.Google Scholar
  26. Linthorst, G and Meindertsma, W. 2015: ASN bank carbon profit and loss methodology version 2.0. ASN Bank: Utrecht.Google Scholar
  27. McGlade, C and Ekins, P. 2015: The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 degrees. Nature 517(7533): 187–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mercer. 2011: Climate change scenarios – implications for strategic asset allocation. New York.Google Scholar
  29. New Climate Economy. 2014: Better growth better climate. London.Google Scholar
  30. PFZW. 2014: Beleggingsbeleid 2015–2020 (Investment Policy 2015–2020), December.Google Scholar
  31. Principles for Responsible Investment. 2014: The montreal carbon pledge. London.Google Scholar
  32. Prudential Regulation Authority. 2015: The impact of climate change on the UK insurance sector. Bank of England: London.Google Scholar
  33. Renneboog, L, ter Horst, J and Zhang, C. 2008: Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior. Journal of Banking and Finance 32: 1723–1742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rockström, J et al 2009: A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461(7263): 472–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shleifer, A and Vishny, RW. 1990: Equilibrium short horizons of investors and firms. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80(2): 148–153.Google Scholar
  36. Shleifer, A and Vishny, RW. 1997: The limits of arbitrage. Journal of Finance 52(1): 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stern, N. 2015: Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. MIT Press: Cambridge, US.Google Scholar
  38. United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEPFI). 2011: Universal ownership: Why environmental externalities matter to institutional investors. New York.Google Scholar
  39. United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEPFI). 2015: Allianz, ABP join portfolio decarbonization coalition; Aligning portfolios with low-carbon economy. New York.Google Scholar
  40. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2015: Adoption of the Paris agreement. Paris.Google Scholar
  41. Weitzman, M. 2013: The geo-engineered planet. In: Palacios-Huerta, I (ed). In One Hundred Years. MIT Press: Cambridge, US.Google Scholar
  42. Weyzig, F, Kuepper, B, van Gelder, JW and van Tilburg, R. 2014: The price of doing too little too late; The impact of the carbon bubble on the European financial system. Green New Deal Series: Brussels. Volume 11.Google Scholar
  43. World Development Movement. 2013: RBS’s true carbon emissions 2012. London.Google Scholar
  44. World Resources Institute. 2015a: Greenhouse gas protocol. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  45. World Resources Institute. 2015b: Climate strategies and metrics; Exploring options for institutional investors, carbon portfolio initiative. Washington DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association for Comparative Economic Studies 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Finance, Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University & BruegelRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Sustainable Finance Lab, Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations