Advertisement

Comparative Economic Studies

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 489–505 | Cite as

The Way We Were: Reflections on the Comparative History of Comparative Economics

  • Peter Murrell
Presidential Address

Abstract

This paper examines the characteristics of comparative economics during the period 1977–1992, using computational tools to collect data on the character of publications. These data depict the distinctive characteristics of comparative economics, for example, whether it was neoclassical or new-institutional, and the balance between theory and empirics. Complete systems were a centerpiece of comparativists’ research, leading to an early focus on institutions, culture, and law. Consequently, the field chose a distinctive point on the trade-off between using advanced techniques and focusing on topics not amenable to study with those techniques. Possibly, this was why comparativists had a distinctive approach to transition.

Keywords

comparative economics intellectual history culturomics socialism institutions transition 

JEL Classifications

B20 B40 C80 P00 P50 

References

  1. Brada, JC . 2009: The new comparative economics versus the old: Less is more but is it enough? The European Journal of Comparative Economics 6: 3–15.Google Scholar
  2. Djankov, S, LaPorta, R, Lopez-de-Silanes, F and Shleifer, A . 2003: The new comparative economics. Journal of Comparative Economics 31: 595–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Easterly, W . 2006: The white man's burden: Why the West's efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. Penguin Press: New York.Google Scholar
  4. JSTOR. 2011: http://www.jstor.org/.
  5. Michel, J-B, Shen, YK, Aiden, AP, Veres, A, Gray, MK, The Google Books Team, Pickett, JP Hoiberg, D Clancy, D Norvig, P Orwant, J Pinker, S Nowak, MA and Aiden, EL 2011: Quantitative analysis of culture using millions of digitized books. Science 331: 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Montias, JM . 1976: The structure of economic systems. Yale University Press: New Haven.Google Scholar
  7. Montias, JM . 1977: Editor's foreword. Journal of Comparative Economics 1: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Murrell, P . 1995: The transition according to Cambridge, Mass. Journal of Economic Literature 33: 164–178.Google Scholar
  9. Murrell, P and Schmidt, M . 2011: The coevolution of culture and institutions in seventeenth century England. Paper presented at the ISNIE meetings, June, Stanford CA.Google Scholar
  10. Pollack, S . 1973: The Way We Were.Google Scholar
  11. Pryor, FL . 2008: The future of comparative economic systems. Paper presented at the Allied Social Sciences Associations Meetings, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  12. Roland, G . 2000: Transition and economics: Politics, markets, and firms. The MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Scirus. 2011: http://www.scirus.com/.

Copyright information

© Association for Comparative Economics 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Murrell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations