Comparative European Politics

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 45–63 | Cite as

Russia and EU cooperation in energy policy – Sending and receiving messages?

  • Anastasia Chebakova
  • Olga Gulyaeva
  • Tatsiana Shaban
  • Amy Verdun
Original Article

Abstract

The Normative Power Europe literature has spent considerable attention on how the European Union (EU) has influence outside its borders. Few studies examine how EU ‘messages’ are being received in third (non-EU) countries. This article examines how EU energy policy is ‘received’ in Russian media. Through a detailed media analysis of five snapshots of 1 month of articles in two leading Russian newspapers over 5 years (2009–2013), we argue that the Russian media does not receive EU messages quite the way the EU intends them to be received, even though Russia does respond to the so-called Third Energy Package. This article contributes to our overall understanding of EU-Russia relations by offering a Russian perspective and thereby contributes to our general understanding of how EU external influence works in countries outside the EU.

Keywords

energy policy EU international relations normative power europe perceptions Russia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research funded reported in this article is part of a larger project – a Jean Monnet Multilateral Research Group (with Natalia Chaban of the University of Canterbury in the lead, and as partners Michèle Knodt of the Technische Universität Darmstadt and Amy Verdun of the University of Victoria). Project title: ‘External Images of the EU’ (EXIE). The group is grateful for financial support from the European Commission during the two-year project 2012–2014. EXIE came together three times for training purposes and for coordinating the research. An earlier version of this article was presented at the third workshop held at the University of Pretoria 22–26 April 2014 and prepared for delivery at the ISA Convention in New Orleans 18–21 February 2015. The authors thank the participants of the EXIE workshop, the guest editors of this special issue, and the two anonymous reviewers of the journal, for constructive criticism and suggestions on the earlier drafts.

References

  1. Aalto, P. (ed.) (2008) The EU-Russia Energy Dialogue: Europe’s Future Energy Security. London: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. Bicchi, F. (2006) ‘Our size fits all’: Normative power Europe and the mediterranean. Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 286–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Björkdahl, A., Chaban, N., Leslie, J. and Masselot, A. (eds.) (2015) Importing EU Norms: Conceptual Framework and Empirical Findings. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bozhilova, D. and Hashimoto, T. (2010) EU – Russia energy negotiations: A choice between rational self-interest and collective action. European Security 19(4): 627–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bushuev, V.V. (2014) Mirovaia Energetika I Rossiia. Moscow, Russia: Energiia.Google Scholar
  6. Busygina, I.M. (2013) Russia – European Union: Potential for partnership. Russian International Affairs Council, Moscow 11: 40–78.Google Scholar
  7. Chaban, N. and Holland, M. (eds.) (2008) The European Union and the Asia – Pacific: Media, Public and Elite Perceptions of the EU. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Chaban, N. and Holland, M. (eds.) (2011) Europe and Asia: Perceptions from Afar. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
  9. Chaban, N. and Holland, M. (eds.) (2013) Special issue: Lisbon and the changing external perceptions of the EU: Visions from the Asia-pacific. Baltic Journal of European Studies 3(3): 1–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaban, N. and Holland, M. (eds.) (2014) Communicating Europe in the Times of Crisis: External Perceptions of the European Union. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chebakova, A. (2011) Cooperation and isolation: Understanding EU-Russia dialogue. Review of European and Russian Affairs 6(1): 16–31.Google Scholar
  12. Chebakova, A. (2015) Exposing the Limits of EU-Russia ‘Autonomous Cooperation’: The Potential of Bakhtin’s Dialogic Imagination, A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Political Science, University of Victoria, Victoria BC, Canada.Google Scholar
  13. Christie, E.H. (2009) Energy vulnerability and EU-Russia energy relations. Journal of Contemporary European Research 5(2): 272–292.Google Scholar
  14. DeBardeleben, J. and Viju, C. (eds.) (2013) The Economic Crisis in Europe: What it Means for the EU and Russia. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diez, T. (2005) Constructing the self and changing others: Reconsidering ‘normative power EU’. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 33(3): 613–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dimitrova, A. and Dragneva, R. (2009) Constraining external governance: Interdependence with Russia and the CIS as limits to the EU’s rule transfer in the Ukraine. Journal of European Public Policy 16(6): 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Entman, R.M. (2003) Projection of Power: Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Esakova, N. (2012) European Energy Security: Analysing the EU-Russia Energy Security Regime in Terms of Interdependence Theory. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (GWV),: Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. EU-Russia Energy Permanent Partnership Council (2011) EU-Russia energy dialogue: 12th progress report, http://ec.europa.eu/energy/international/russia/doc/20111201_eu_russia_report.pdf, accessed 28 November 2014.
  20. European Commission (2007) Energy. Single market for gas and electricity. Third package for gas and electricity, http://www2.nationalgrid.com/UK/Industry-information/Europe/Third-energy-package/, accessed 17 May 2016.
  21. European Commission (2009) Addressing the impact of the financial crisis on EU – Russia energy cooperation. European commission final report, http://www.enpi-info.eu/library/sites/.../impact-financial-crisis-eu-russia-en.pdf, accessed 9 October 2014.
  22. European Commission (2011) EU-Russia energy dialogue: The first ten years. Directorate-general for energy report, http://ec.europa.eu/energy/publications/doc/2011_eu-russia_energy_relations.pdf, accessed 9 October 2014.
  23. European Commission (2014a) On EU-Russia energy relations. European Commission official website, http://ec.europa.eu/energy/international/russia/russia_en.htm, accessed 9 October 2014.
  24. European Union (2013) The roadmap EU-Russia Energy Cooperation until 2050, March http://ec.europa.eu/energy/international/russia/doc/2013_03_eu_russia_roadmap_2050_signed.pdf.
  25. European Commission (2014b) In-depth study of European energy security, accompanying the document communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament: European energy security strategy {COM(2014) 330 final}. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. (This document corrects document SWD(2014)330 final/2 of 16.06.2014.), http://ec.europa.eu/energy/sites/ener/files/documents/20140528_energy_security_study.pdf, accessed 14 October 2014.
  26. Finon, D. and Locatelli, C. (2007) Russian and European gas interdependence: Can market forces balance out geopolitics? Labaratoire d’economie de la Production et de l’Integration Internationale (LEPII), Departement Energie et Politiques de l’Environnement (EPE), https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00129618v2/file/Cahier41bis.pdf, accessed 17 May 2016.
  27. Gower, J. and Timmins, G. (eds.) (2009) Russia and Europe in the Twenty-First Century: An Uneasy Partnership. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  28. Grib, N., Egikian, S. and Kyseleva, E. (2010) Nemtsy sdayut ‘Gazprom’. Kommersant 24 November: 1.Google Scholar
  29. Gulyaeva, O. (2013) Russian vision of the EU in its interactions with the neighbourhood. Baltic Journal of European Studies 3(3): 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gulyaeva, O. (2014) EU-Russia relations: Reality and perceptions. PhD thesis. University of Canterbury: Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  31. Harnas, A. (2010) Polnotsennoy geologorazvedki posledneye vremya velos’ nedostatochno. Kommersant 1 December: 6.Google Scholar
  32. Headley, J. (2014) Challenging the EU’s claim to moral authority: Russian talk of ‘double standards’. Paper presented at ‘Normative Power Europe? European Union External outreach and international identity’, 28 February, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  33. Hyde-Price, A. (2006) ‘Normative’ power Europe: A realist critique. Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iškauskas, C. (2011) Third energy package: Dispute between Russia and the EU. European dialogue, http://www.eurodialogue.eu/Third-Energy-Package-dispute-between-Russia-and-the-EU, accessed 20 October 2014.
  35. Ivanov, I.S. (2013) International conference materials ‘Russia-European union: Potential for partnership’, Russian international affairs council, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  36. Johnson, D. and Robertson, P. (2005) Perspectives on EU-Russia Relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Koikkalanen, K. (2009) The local and the international in Russian business journalism: Structures and practices. In: B. Beumers, S. Hutchings and N. Rulyova (eds.) Globalisation, Freedom and the Media After Communism: The Past as the Future. London: Routledge, pp. 71–85.Google Scholar
  38. Kommersant (2013) Kommersant. Yezhednevnaya Obshchenatsional’naya Delovaya Gazeta [Kommesant. National Daily Business Newspaper], http://www.kommersant.ru/about/kommersant, accessed 10 October 2014.
  39. Krastev, I. (2008) The EU, Russia and the crisis of the post Cold war European order, Europe’s world, summer, http://www.europesworld.org/EWSettings/Article/tabid/191/ArticleType/articleview/ArticleID/20551/Default.aspx, accessed October 2014.
  40. Krutihin, M. (2010) Glavnyy snabzhenets Yaponii. Vedomosti 23 November: 20.Google Scholar
  41. Kuznetsova, E. and Zhuravlev, A. (2012) Kak Rossii Dostuchatsia do EU. Vedomosti 20 December. N3256 http://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2012/12/20/obnovit_povestku.
  42. Lavenex (2004) EU external governance in ‘wider Europe’. Journal of European Public Policy 11(4): 680–700.Google Scholar
  43. Manners, I. (2002) Normative power Europe: A contradiction in terms? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 40(2): 235–258.Google Scholar
  44. Manners, I. (2006a) Normative power Europe reconsidered: Beyond the crossroads. Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 182–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Manners, I. (2006b) The European union as a normative power: A response to Thomas Diez. Millennium – Journal of International Studies 35(1): 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Margarita, L. and Ekaterina, K. (2012) Gazprom Nameren Reformirovat Strukturu Svoih Evropeiskih Aktivov (Gazprom Intends to Reform the Structure of its European Assets). Vedomosti 20 September.Google Scholar
  47. Menon, A. (2013) The other Euro crisis – Why Europe desperately needs military cooperation’ Foreign Affairs, snapshot, 13 December, https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/western-europe/2013-12-10/other-euro-crisis, accessed 17 May 2016.
  48. Ministry of Energy of the Russian Federation (2009) Energy strategy 2030, http://minenergo.gov.ru/aboutminen/energostrategy/, accessed 9 October 2014.
  49. Nitoiu, C. (2011) Reconceptualizing ‘cooperation’ in EU-Russia relations. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 12(4): 462–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Overchenko, M. and Tovkailo, M. (2012) God bez krizisa. Vedomosti 29(November).Google Scholar
  51. Proedrou, F. (2007) The EU – Russia energy approach under the prism of interdependence. European Security 16(3–4): 329–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pursiainen, C. (1998) Beyond Sovietology. International Relations Theory and the Study of Soviet/Russian Foreign and Security Policy. Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  53. Romanova, T. (2013) EU – Russia energy cooperation: Major development trends and the present state. Baltic Region 3(17): 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ruxandra, I. (eds.) (2012) New regionalism and No Regionalism: Emerging Regionalism in a Black Sea Area. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  55. Sjursen, H. (2006) The ‘EU’ as a normative power: How can it be? Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 235–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. The Guardian (2015) Sanoma sells Vedomosti stake amid concerns over Russian media laws, 1 May, http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/may/01/sanoma-sells-vedomosti-stake-amid-concerns-over-russian-media-laws, accessed 17 May 2016.
  57. Tichý, L. and Kratochvíl, P. (2014) The EU-Russia energy relations under the prism of the political discourse. Perspectives 22(1): 22–41.Google Scholar
  58. Vahl, M. (2006) A privileged partnership? EU-Russian relations in a comparative perspective. Danish Institute for International Studies Working Papers, http://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/84582/1/DIIS2006-03.pdf, accessed 17 May 2016.
  59. Vedomosti (2014) About Vedomosti. Newspaper official website, http://www.vedomosti.ru/eng/, accessed 10 October 2014.
  60. Walker, M. (2007) Russia v. Europe: The energy wars. World Policy Journal 24(1): 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Whitman, R. (2011) Normative Power Europe: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Willerton, J. and Beznosov, M. (2007) Russia’s pursuit of its Eurasian security interests: Weighing the CIS and alternative bilateral-multilateral arrangements. In: K. Malfliet, L. Verpoest and E. Vinokurov (eds.) The CIS, the EU and Russia: Challenges of Integration. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  63. Winrow, G. (2007) Geopolitics and energy security in the wider black sea region. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 7(2): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anastasia Chebakova
    • 1
  • Olga Gulyaeva
    • 2
  • Tatsiana Shaban
    • 1
  • Amy Verdun
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science, University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  2. 2.National Centre for Research on Europe, University of CanterburyChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations