Skip to main content
Log in

National parliaments in the European Union: Moving towards more ‘cooperative’ institutions?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Comparative European Politics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article argues that the effective participation in systems of multilevel governance such as the European Union (EU) requires national parliaments to become more ‘cooperative’ institutions. In fact, legislatures are increasingly dependent on obtaining information from third parties such as other national parliaments and EU institutions for effectively scrutinizing EU politics. The Lisbon Treaty provisions also encourage this increasing interaction with external actors. Yet, this article shows that effective participation in EU affairs also requires more regular and more intensive cooperation with domestic actors such as the government or upper chambers. Finally, the need for more cooperation also applies to the internal parliamentary setting and covers the interaction between government and opposition parties, between sectoral committees, and between the parliamentary administration and MPs. Drawing on specific instances of national parliamentary involvement in EU affairs throughout the entire policy cycle, the article will show that adopting these cooperative strategies renders national parliamentary participation in EU politics more effective. Yet, the requirement to act in a more cooperative way risks at the same time to undermine a further politicization of the EU among more substantial political issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This article will only focus on the legislative and the control function of national parliaments. For an analysis of the communication function of national parliaments in the EU, see Auel and Raunio (2014).

  2. Each national parliament has two votes, which are distributed equally in case of bicameral systems.

  3. The full title of the proposal is ‘Proposal for a Council Regulation on the exercise of the right to take collective action within the context of the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services’ (COM 2012/130).

References

  • Andeweg, R. and Nijzink, L. (1995) Beyond the two-body-image: Relations between ministers and MPs. In: H. Döring (ed.) Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt, Germany; New York: Campus, St. Martin’s, pp. 152–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. (2007) Democratic accountability and national parliaments: Redefining the impact of parliamentary scrutiny in EU affairs. European Law Journal 13 (4): 487–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auel, K. and Benz, A. (eds.) (2005) The Europeanization of parliamentary democracy. Special Issue Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4).

  • Auel, K. and Raunio, T. (2014) Introduction: Connecting with the electorate? Parliamentary communication in EU affairs. Journal of Legislative Studies 20 (1): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz, A. (2004) Path-dependent institutions and strategic veto players: National parliaments in the European Union. West European Politics 27 (5): 875–900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T., Högenauer, A.L. and Neuhold, C. (2014) National parliaments in the post-Lisbon European Union: Bureaucratization rather than democratization? Comparative European Politics 12 (2): 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, I. (2015) A yellow card for the striker: national parliaments and the defeat of EU legislation on the right to strike. Journal of European Public Policy 1–20, (forthcoming).

  • Costa, O. (2013) Conclusion: Challenging the conventional wisdoms about parliamentary representation in France. Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (2): 278–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, D. and O’Halloran, S. (1999) Delegating Powers: A Transaction Cost Politics Approach to Policy Making under Separate Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M. and Leiber, S. (2005) Complying with Europe: EU Harmonization and Soft Law in the Member States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gattermann, K. and Hefftler, C. (2013) Political motivation and institutional capacity: Assessing national parliaments’ incentives to participate in the early warning system. OPAL Online Paper Series 15/2013, http://www.opal-europe.org/tmp/Opal%20Online%20Paper/15%20%28new%29.pdf.

  • Goetz, K. and Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2008) The Europeanisation of national political systems: Parliaments and executives. Living Reviews European Governance 3(2):1–30.

  • Grant, R. and Keohane, R. (2005) Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, H. (2007) A model for the strictest scrutiny? the danish european affairs committee in a party group perspective. In: R. Holzhacker and E. Albaek (eds.) Democratic governance and European integration: linking societal and state processes of democracy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaczynski, P. (2011) Paper Tigers or Sleeping Beauties? National Parliaments in the Post-Lisbon European Political System. Centre of European Policy Studies (CEPS) Special Report, Brussels, Belgium: CEPS.

  • Kaeding, M. (2007) Better regulation in the European Union: Lost in Translation or Full Steam Ahead? The transportation of EU transport directives across member states. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlas, J. (2011) Parliamentary control of EU affairs in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 18 (2): 258–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kassim, H. (2005) The Europeanization of member state institutions. In: S. Bulmer and C. Lequesne (eds.) The Member States of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 285–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. and Wessels, B. (eds.) (1999) The European Parliament, National Parliaments, and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, D. and McCubbins, M. (1991) The Logic of Delegation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • König, T. and Mäder, L. (2007) The Delegation of Transposition Powers in the Member States of the EC: Between Parliament and the Administrative State. Paper presented at 4th General Conference of the European Consortium for Political Research, Pisa, 6–8 September, pp. 1–41.

  • Lupia, A. (2003) Delegation and its perils. In: K. Strom, W. Müller and T. Bergman (eds.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 33–54.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, A. and Wessels, W. (eds.) (2001) National Parliaments on their Ways to Europe: Losers or Latecomers? Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbins, M. and Schwartz, T. (1984) Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American Journal of Political Science 28 (1): 165–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miklin, Eric (2013) Inter-parliamentary cooperation in EU affairs and the Austrian parliament: Empowering the opposition? Journal of Legislative Studies 19 (1): 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhold, C., Vanhoonacker, S. and Verhey, L. (eds.) (2013) Civil Servants and Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brennan, J. and Raunio, T. (2007) National Parliaments within the Enlarged European Union: From Victims of Integration to Competitive Actors? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (2005) Holding governments accountable in European affairs: Explaining cross-national variation. Journal of Legislative Studies 11 (3–4): 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raunio, T. (2011) The gatekeepers of European integration? The functions of national parliaments in the EU political system. Journal of European Integration 3 (3): 303–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, T. (2000) Members of parliament and governments in Western Europe: Agency relations and problems of oversight. European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 353–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sprungk, C. (2010) Ever more or ever better scrutiny? Analysing the conditions of effective national parliamentary involvement in EU affairs. European Integration online Papers(EIoP) 14(2): 1–25.

  • Sprungk, C. (2013a) A new type of representative democracy? Reconsidering the role of national parliaments in the European Union. Journal of European Integration 35 (5): 547–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprungk, C. (2013b) Legislative transposition of directives: Exploring the other role of national parliaments in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (2): 298–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (2000) Delegation and accountability in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 261–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (2003) Parliamentary democracy and delegation. In: K. Strom, W. Müller and T. Bergman (eds.) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 55–108.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K., Müller, W. and Bergman, T. (eds.) (2003) Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szukala, A and Olivier, R (2001) The french parliament and the EU: Progressive assertion and strategic investment’. In: W. Wessels and A. Maurer (eds.) National parliaments on their ways to Europe: Losers or latecomers? Baden-Baden: Nomos, pp. 223–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toshkov, D., Dörrenbacher, N. and Mastenbroek, E. (2015) National parliaments and transposition of EU law: A matter of coalition conflict? Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (5): 1010–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the editors, the anonymous reviewer and the participants of the Heidelberg University workshop on ‘Parliamentary scrutiny of European politics’ for valuable comments on a previous version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sprungk, C. National parliaments in the European Union: Moving towards more ‘cooperative’ institutions?. Comp Eur Polit 14, 177–195 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.42

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.42

Keywords

Navigation