Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 290–309 | Cite as

Vote, party, or protest: The influence of confidence in political institutions on various modes of political participation in Europe

  • Alexia Katsanidou
  • Christina Eder
Article

Abstract

Although the study of the relationship between political confidence and political participation has produced contradictory results thus far, it has established, nevertheless, that this relationship depends on the exact nature of the participation: voting, party engagement and protesting. On the basis of these findings, to further specify the nature of this relationship, we make a second distinction between confidence in representative and implementing institutions. We assume that context matters, so our multi-level approach includes individual level data from the 1999 to 2001 and 2008 to 2010 waves of the European Values Study (EVS), as well as national-level data. Our results show that different types of confidence in institutions have unique effects on these three modes of participation and that these findings hold over the last decade. While confidence in parliament is the key to the elite-driven modes of participation, grassroots-driven modes are triggered by a lack of confidence in the implementing institutions.

Keywords

political participation confidence in political institutions multi-level analysis 

References

  1. Abravanel, M.D. and Busch, R.J. (1975) Political competence, political trust, and the action orientations of university students. Journal of Politics 37(1): 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almond, G.A. and Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T. and Listhaug, O. (2005) Loser’s Consent. Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C.J. and Guillory, C.A. (1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review 91(1): 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Armingeon, K. et al (2011) Comparative Political Data Set III 1990–2009. Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychology 37(2): 122–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barnes, S.H. and Kaase, M. (1979) Political Action. Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Catterberg, G. and Moreno, A. (2006) The Individual bases of political trust: Trends in new and established democracies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 18(1): 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Christiansen, H.S. (2014) All the same? Examining the Link between three kinds of political dissatisfaction and protest. Comparative European Politics, advance online publication doi:10.1057/cep.2014.52.Google Scholar
  10. Citrin, J. and Muste, C. (1999) Trust in government. In: J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman (eds.) Measures of Political Attitudes. Volume 2 of Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 465–532.Google Scholar
  11. Craig, S.C. and Maggiotto, M.A. (1981) Political discontent and political action. The Journal of Politics 43(2): 514–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, R.J. (2004) Democratic Challenges, Democratic Choices. The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dalton, R.J. (2008) Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies 56(1): 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalton, R.J., van Sickle, A. and Weldon, S. (2009) The individual-institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dalton, R.J., Farrell, D.M. and McAllister, I. (2011) Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DellaPorta, D. (2000) Social capital, beliefs in government and political corruption. In: S.J. Pharr and R.D. Putnam (eds.) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 202–229.Google Scholar
  17. Denters, B., Gabriel, O.W. and Torcal, M. (2007) Political confidence in representative democracies: Socio-cultural vs. Political explanations. In: J. Van Deth, J. Ramon Montero and A. Westholm (eds.) Citizenship and Involvement in European Democracies. A Comparative Analysis. New York: Routledge, pp. 66–87.Google Scholar
  18. Easton, D. (1965) A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. EVS (2011a) European Values Study 1999: Integrated Dataset (EVS 1999). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3811 Data file Version 3.0.0 doi:10.4232/1.10789.Google Scholar
  20. EVS (2011b) European Values Study 2008: Integrated Dataset (EVS 2008). GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA4800 Data file Version 3.0.0 doi:10.4232/1.11004.Google Scholar
  21. Fauvelle-Aymar, C. and Abel, F. (2006) The impact of closeness on turnout: An empirical relation based on a study of a two-round ballot. Public Choice 127(3–4): 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Freitag, M. and Bühlmann, M. (2009) Crafting trust. The role of political institutions in a comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies 42(12): 1537–1566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gamson, W.A. (1968) Power and Discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.Google Scholar
  24. Geys, B. (2006) Explaining voter turnout. A review of aggregate-level research. Electoral Studies 25(4): 637–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hetherington, M. (1998) The political relevance of political trust. American Political Science Review 92(4): 791–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hibbing, J.R. and Theiss-Morse, E. (2002) Stealth Democracy: Americans’ Beliefs about how Government Should Work. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooghe, M. (2011) Why there is basically only one form of political trust. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 13(2): 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hooghe, M. and Kern, A. (2015) Party membership and closeness and the development of trust in political institutions an analysis of the european social survey, 2002–2010. Party Politics, advance online publication doi:10.1177/1354068813509519.Google Scholar
  29. Hooghe, M. and Marien, S. (2013) A comparative analysis of the relation between political trust and forms of political participation in Europe. European Societies 15(1): 131–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Post-Modernization: Cultural, Political and Economic Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Inglehart, R. and Catterberg, G. (2002) Trends in political action: The developmental trend and the post-honeymoon decline. International Journal of Comparative Sociology 43(3–5): 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaase, M. (1999) Interpersonal trust, political trust and non‐institutionalised political participation in Western Europe. West European Politics 22(3): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A. and Mastruzzi, M. (2010) The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank Policy Reserach Working Paper, 5430, 1–29.Google Scholar
  34. Keele, L. (2007) Social capital and the dynamics of trust in government. American Journal of Political Science 51(2): 241–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kumlin, S. and Rothstein, B. (2005) Making and breaking social capital. The impact of welfare-state institutions. Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kriesi, H. (2008) Political mobilisation, political participation and the power of the vote. West European Politics 31(1): 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lenard, P.T. (2008) Trust your compatriots, but count your change: The roles of trust, mistrust and distrust in democracy. Political Studies 56(2): 312–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Levi, M. and Stoker, L. (2000) Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science 3: 475–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lijphart, A. (1999) Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performances in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Luks, S. and Citrin, J. (1997) Revisiting Political Trust in an Angry Age. Unpublished.Google Scholar
  41. Marien, S., Hooghe, M. and Quintelier, E. (2010) Inequalities in non-institutionalised forms of political participation: A multi-level analysis of 25 countries. Political Studies 58(1): 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (1997) Trust, distrust and skepticism: Popular evaluations of civil and political institutions in post-communist societies. Journal of Politics 59(2): 418–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morris, S.D. and Klesner, J.L. (2010) Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from mexico. Comparative Political Studies 43(10): 1258–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mueller, E.N., Jukam, T.O. and Selligson, M.A. (1982) Diffuse political support and anti-system political behaviour: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science 26(3): 240–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newton, K. (2001) Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review 22(2): 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Newton, K. and Montero, J.R. (2007) Patterns of political and social participation in Europe. In: R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald and G. Eva (eds.) Measuring Attitudes Cross-Nationally. Lessons from the European Social Survey. Los Angeles, CA: Sage, pp. 205–237.Google Scholar
  47. Norris, P. (ed.) (1999) Conclusions: The growth of critical citizens and its consequences. In: Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Norris, P. (2011) Democratic Deficit. Critical Citizen Revisited. Cambridge, US: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norris, P., Walgrave, S. and Van Aelst, P. (2005) Who demonstrates? Anti-state rebels, conventional participants, or everyone? Comparative Politics 37(2): 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norris, P., Walgrave, S. and Van Aelst, P. (2012) Does protest signify dissatisfaction? Demonstartors in a postindustrial democracy. In: M. Torcal and J.R. Montero (eds.) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies. London: Routledge, pp. 279–307.Google Scholar
  51. Pharr, S.J., Putnam, R.D. and Dalton, R.J. (2000) A quarter-century of declining confidence. Journal of Democracy 11(2): 5–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone. The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  53. Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2003) Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state: An institutional approach. In: M. Hooghe and D. Stolle (eds.) Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and Institutions in Comparative Perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 191–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rothstein, B. and Stolle, D. (2008) The state and social capital: An institutional theory of generalized trust. Journal of Comparative Politics 40(4): 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rothstein, B. and Teorell, J. (2008) What is quality of government? A theory of impartial government institutions. Governance 21(2): 165–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rudolph, T.J. and Evans, J. (2005) Political trust, ideology, and public support for government spending. American Journal of Political Science 49(3): 660–671.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Seligman, A.B. (1997) The Problem of Trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Stokes, D.E. (1962) Popular evaluations of government: An empirical assessment. In: H. Cleveland and H.D. Lasswell (eds.) Ethics and Bigness: Scientific, Academic, Religious, Political, and Military. New York: Harper, pp. 61–72.Google Scholar
  59. Stolle, D., Hooghe, M. and Micheletti, M. (2005) Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review 26(3): 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tarrow, S. (2000) Mad cows and activists: Contentious politics in the trilateral democracies. In: S.J. Pharr and R.D. Putnam (eds.) Disaffected Democracies: What’s Troubling the Trilateral Countries? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 270–289.Google Scholar
  61. Torcal, M. (2014) The decline of political trust in Spain and Portugal. economic performance or political responsiveness. American Behavioral Scientist 58(12): 1542–1567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van der Meer, T. and Dekker, P. (2011) Trustworthy states, trusting citizens? A multilevel study into objective and subjective determinants of political trust. In: S. Zmerli and M. Hooghe (eds.) Political Trust. Why Context Matters. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press, pp. 95–116.Google Scholar
  63. Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H. (1995) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexia Katsanidou
    • 1
  • Christina Eder
    • 2
  1. 1.GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesCologneGermany
  2. 2.GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social SciencesMannheimGermany

Personalised recommendations