Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 249–270 | Cite as

Authoritarian legacies and mass left–right regime support in new democracies: The Baltic States and Southern Europe compared

Original Article
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

The formation of left–right (LR) identities depends upon effective partisan and ideological differentiation at the supply level and is associated with the existence of free political competition. In a new democracy, however, does the type of authoritarian legacy (left-wing versus right-wing) have any effect on the impact of citizen LR identities on regime support? If so, then how does that impact evolve over time? To answer this, we compare the impact of citizen LR identities on regime support in six countries (Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania for the Baltic States, and Greece, Portugal and Spain for Southern Europe) over a 20–30-year period. We show that in both the cases of the evaluation of authoritarian regimes and democratic diffuse support, authoritarian legacy has a significant and rather robust impact. In the case of democratic diffuse support, criticisms come more from the left in the Baltic States and more from the right in Southern Europe, while the opposite was found in the evaluation of authoritarian regimes. We also demonstrate that over time, while the relationships remain significant – albeit much weaker – for the evaluation of authoritarian regimes, they almost disappear in terms of democratic diffuse support.

Keywords

left–right ideology new democracies regime support values Southern Europe Baltic states 

References

  1. Anderson, C.J. and Guillory, C.A. (1997) Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review 91(1): 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, S.H. (2002) Left and right in old and new democracies. Central European Political Science Review 3(7): 6–15.Google Scholar
  3. Barnes, S.H., McDonough, P. and Pina, A.L. (1985) The development of partisanship in new democracies: The case of Spain. American Journal of Political Science 3(7): 695–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bruneau, T.C., Diamandouros, P.N., Gunther, R., Lijphart, A., Morlino, L. and Brooks, R.A. (2001) Democracy, Southern European style. In: P.N. Diamandouros and R. Gunther (eds.) Parties, Politics, and Democracy in the New Southern Europ. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 16–82.Google Scholar
  5. Duvold, K. and Jurkynas, M. (2003) Lithuania. In: S. Berglund, J. Ekman and F. Aarebrot (eds.) The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 133–180.Google Scholar
  6. Ehin, P. (2007) Political support in the Baltic states, 1993–2004. Journal of Baltic Studies 38(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. European Value Study (1999) Wave 3, ZA Nº 4804.Google Scholar
  8. European Value Study (2008) Wave 4, ZA Nº 4804.Google Scholar
  9. Evans, G. and Whitefield, S. (1998) Identifying the bases of party competition in Eastern Europe. British Journal of Political Science 23(4): 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Freire, A. (2006) L-R ideological identities in new democracies: Greece, Portugal and Spain in the Western European context. Pôle Sud – Revue de Science Politique de l’Europe Méridionale 25(II): 153–173.Google Scholar
  11. Freire, A. (2008) Party polarization and citizens’ L-R orientations. Party Politics 14(2): 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Freire, A. and Ana, B. (2011) What left and right means to Portuguese citizens. Comparative European Politics 9(2): 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freire, A. and Kivistik, K. (2013) Mapping and explaining the use of the left-right divide. Brazilian Political Science Review 7(3): 61–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gunther, R. (2005) Parties and electoral behavior in Southern Europe. Comparative Political Studies 37(3): 253–275.Google Scholar
  15. Gunther, R., Puhle, H.-J. and Diamandouros, P.N. (1995) Introduction. In: R. Gunther, N.P. Diamandouros and H.-J. Puhle (eds.) The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 1–32.Google Scholar
  16. Jerschina, J. and Górniak, J. (1997) Leftism, achievement, orientation and basic dimensions of the socio-economic and political attitudes in Baltic countries versus other Central and East European countries. In: N. Hood, R. Hilis and J.-E. Vahlne (eds.)(1997) Transition in the Baltic States: Micro-Level Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 80–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jou, W. (2010a) Political cleavages in Serbia: Changes and continuities in structuring L-R orientations. South East European and Black Sea Studies 10(2): 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jou, W. (2010b) Continuities and changes in L-R orientations in new democracies: The cases of Croatia and Slovenia. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 43(1): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jurkynas, M. (2004) Emerging cleavages in new democracies: The case of Lithuania. Journal of Baltic Studies 35(3): 278–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kitschelt, H. (1995) Formation of party cleavages in post-Communist democracies. Party Politics 1(4): 447–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kitschelt, H., Mansfeldova, Z., Markowski, R. and Toka, G. (1999) Post-Communist Party Systems: Competition, Representation and Inter-Party Cooperation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klingemann, H.-D., Fuchs, D. and Zielonka, J. (eds.) (2006) Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M. (eds.) (2006) Uniquely! The mapping of party policy movements in Central and Eastern Europe 1990–2003. In: Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–27.Google Scholar
  24. Lagerspetz, M. and Vogt, H. (2003) Estonia. In: S. Berglund, J. Ekman and F. Aarebrot (eds.) The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 57–94.Google Scholar
  25. Linz, J.J. and Stepan, A. (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Linz, J.J., Stepan, A. and Gunther, R. (1995) Transition and consolidation. In: R. Gunther, N.P. Diamandouros and H.-J. Puhle (eds.) The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 77–123.Google Scholar
  27. McDonough, P. (1995) Identities, ideologies, and interests: Democratization and the culture of mass politics in Spain and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Politics 57(3): 649–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (1996) Trajectories of fear and hope: Support for democracy in post-communist Europe. Comparative Political Studies 28(4): 553–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mishler, W. and Rose, R. (2002) Learning and re-learning regime support: The dynamics of post-communist regimes. European Journal of Political Research 41(1): 5–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morlino, L. (1998) Democracy Between Consolidation and Crisis: Parties, Groups and Citizens in Southern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Morlino, L. and Montero, J.R. (1995) Democracy and legitimacy in Southern Europe. In: R. Gunther, P.N. Diamandouros and H.-J. Puhle (eds.) The Politics of Democratic Consolidation: Southern Europe in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 231–260.Google Scholar
  32. Munro, N. (2002) Post-communist regime support in space and time context. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 18(2): 103–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Neundorf, A. (2009) Growing up on different sides of the wall – A quasi-experimental test: Applying the L-R dimension to the German mass public. German Politics 18(2): 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Niemi, R.G., Powell, Jr G.B., Stanley, H.W. and Evans, C.L. (1985) Testing the converse partisanship model with new electorates. Comparative Political Studies 18(3): 300–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Plakans, A. (2011) A Concise History of the Baltic States. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pop-Eleches, G. and Tucker, J.A. (2010) After the Party: Legacies and Left-Right Distinctions in Post-Communist Countries. Estudio/Working Paper 2010/250, Chicago, June.Google Scholar
  37. Regt, S.d.e., Mortelmans, D. and Smits, T. (2011) Left-wing authoritarianism is not a myth, but a worrisome reality: Evidence from 13 Eastern European countries. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44(4): 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rose, R. and Mishler, W. (2002) Comparing regime support in non-democratic and democratic countries. Democratization 9(2): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rose, R. and Munro, N. (2009) Parties and Elections in New European Democracies. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rose, R., Berglund, S. and Munro, N. (2006) Baltic identities and interests in a European setting: A bottom-up perspective. In: J. McGarry and M. Keating (eds.) European Integration and the Nationalities Question. London: Routledge, pp. 308–328.Google Scholar
  41. Sani, G., Santamaria, J., Mavrogordatos, G. and Bacalhau, M. (1985) Political culture in Southern Europe: A four-nation study. In: A. Freire, M.C. Lobo, P. Magalhães and A. Espírito-Santo (eds.)(2005) Comportamentos e Atitudes Políticas: Inquéritos e Bases de Dados, 1973–2002. Lisbon, Portugal: Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.Google Scholar
  42. Sitter, N. (2002) Cleavages, party strategy and party system change in Europe, east and west. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 3(3): 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith-Sivertsen, H. (2003) Latvia. In: S. Berglund, J. Ekman and F. Aarebrot (eds.) The Handbook of Political Change in Eastern Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar, pp. 95–132.Google Scholar
  44. Steen, A. (1996) Confidence in institutions in post-communist societies: The case of the Baltic States. Scandinavian Political Studies 19(3): 205–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Steen, A. (2007) Do elite beliefs matter? Elites and economic reforms in the Baltic States and Russia. Comparative Social Research 23: 79–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Torcal, M. (2006) Political disaffection and democratization history in new democracies. In: M. Torcal and J.R. Montero (eds.) Political Disaffection in Conemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics. London: Routledge, pp. 157–189.Google Scholar
  47. Torcal, M. and Magalhães, P. (2010) Cultura política en el sur de Europa: Un estudio comparado en busca de su excepcionalismo. In: M. Torcal (ed.) La Ciudadania Europea en El Siglo XXI: Estudio Comparado de sus Actitudes, Opinion Pública y Comportamentos Políticos. Madrid, Spain: CIS, pp. 45–84.Google Scholar
  48. Van der Eijk, C., Schmitt, H. and Binder, T. (2005) Left-right orientations and party choice. In: J. Thomassen (ed.) The European Voter. A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Various Authors (2012) Baltic voices, CSPP: Centre for the study of public policy, University of Strathclyde, http://www.balticvoices.org/, accessed 16 May 2012.
  50. Whitefield, S. (2002) Political cleavages and post-communist politics. Annual Review of Political Science 5: 181–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. World Values Survey for Central and Eastern Europe (1996–1997) ZA Study Number (N°) 3062, https://dbk.gesis.org/dbksearch/sdesc2.asp?no=3062&db=e&doi=10.4232/1.3062.
  52. Zarycki, T. (2000) Politics in the periphery: Political Cleavages in Poland interpreted in their Historical and International Context. Europe-Asia Studies 52(5): 851–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Public Policies & CIES-IUL, ISCTE – IUL (Lisbon University Institute)LisboaPortugal
  2. 2.Tartu University, Institute of Government and Politics (IGP)TartuEstonia

Personalised recommendations