Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 198–223 | Cite as

Unanimity, Consensus and Peripheral Parties as Determinants of EU Policy Coordination in Federal Member States

  • Álvaro Morcillo Laiz
Original Article

Abstract

EU scholars have long argued that regions can shape the integration process, but there is no agreement on why this is so. While some authors consider constitutional powers, intergovernmental relations, or differentiated regional elites as independent variables, those interested in Europeanization argue that the ‘transformative power of Europe’ enticed both central and regional governments to adopt consensual policy styles, akin to those prevailing in the EU. Accordingly, new territorial arrangements would have made effective participation in the integration process possible. However, scholars have failed to pay due consideration to a crucial factor: the decision-making rule employed in the coordination mechanisms. In this article, I argue that cooperation among regions actually depends mostly on whether decisions are taken by consensus or unanimity. Common regional positions and impacts on EU decisions become unlikely if peripheral parties increase the levels of conflict. The arguments build on theoretical warrants taken from actor-centered institutionalism.

Keywords

European Union cooperative federalism peripheral parties audiovisual policy cohesion policy decision-making rules 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article has benefited from valuable comments from Lorena Ruano and Andreas Schedler, as well as from the reviewers and editors of Comparative European Politics. Mark Aspinwall also provided valuable help, including feedback on previous drafts. José María Pérez Medina, at the time at the Spanish Ministerio de Administraciones Públicas, has generously shared experiences and documents. The research assistance of José Miguel Olvera is also gratefully acknowledged. I finished the article while I was a fellow in the Global Governance Unit at the Berlin Social Science Center (WZB) on a grant from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD). All errors and shortcomings remain my sole responsibility.

References

  1. Aja, E. (2003) El Estado autónomico: federalismo y hechos diferenciales, 2nd edn. Madrid, Spain: Alianza Editorial.Google Scholar
  2. Aja, E. and Colino, C. (2014) Multilevel structures, coordination and partisan politics in Spanish intergovernmental relations. Comparative European Politics 12(4–5): 444–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. (2005) The Lega Nord in the Second Berlusconi government: A league of its own. West European Politics 28(5): 952–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Albertazzi, D. and McDonnell, D. (2010) The Lega Nord back in government. West European Politics 33(6): 1318–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, D. (2010) The structural funds and cohesion policy: Extending the bargain to meet new challenges. In: H. Wallace, M.A. Pollack and A.R. Young (eds.) Policy-making in the European Union. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 229–252.Google Scholar
  6. Bache, I. (2008) Europeanization and Multilevel Governance: Cohesion Policy in the European Union and Britain. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Bache, I. (1999) The extended gatekeeper: Central government and the implementation of EC regional policy in the UK. Journal of European Public Policy 6(1): 28–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bache, I. and Jones, R. (2000) Has EU regional policy empowered the regions? A study of Spain and the United Kingdom. Regional and Federal Studies 10(3): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bachtler, J. and Méndez, C. (2007) Who governs EU cohesion policy? Deconstructing the reforms of the structural funds. Journal of Common Market Studies 45(3): 535–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baudner, J. and Bull, M.J. (2013) The europeanisation of national institutions reassessed: A comparison of regional policies in Germany and Italy. Comparative European Politics 11(2): 201–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Beltrán García, S. (2012a) Is there a real model in spain for autonomous communities to participate in the council of the European Union or is it only a mirage? Journal of Contemporary European Studies 20(4): 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beltrán García, S. (2012b) Una salida para la representación de las comunidades autónomas en el Consejo de la UE. Revista CIDOB d’Afers Internacionals (99): 133–156.Google Scholar
  13. Bomberg, E. and Peterson, J. (1998) European Union decision making: The role of sub-national authorities. Political Studies 46(2): 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borghetto, E. and Franchino, F. (2010) The role of subnational authorities in the implementation of EU directives. Journal of European Public Policy 17(6): 759–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Börzel, T.A. (2002) States and Regions in the European Union. Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Börzel, T.A. (1999) Towards convergence in Europe? Institutional adaptation to europeanization in Germany and Spain. Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2006) Europeanization: The domestic impact of European Union politics. In: K.E. Jørgensen, M.A. Pollack and B. Rosamond (eds.) Handbook of European Union politics. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, pp. 483–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Börzel, T.A. and Risse, T. (2012) From Europeanisation to diffusion: Introduction. West European Politics 35(1): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bourne, A.K. (2008) The European Union and the Accommodation of Basque Difference in Spain. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bourne, A.K. (2003) The impact of European integration on regional power. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(4): 597–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bullmann, U. and Eißel, D. (1993) ‘Europa der Regionen.’ Entwicklung und Perspektiven. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B(20–21): 3–15.Google Scholar
  22. Bulmer, S., Burch, M., Carter, C., Hogwood, P. and Scott, A. (2002) British Devolution and European Policy-Making: Transforming Britain into Multi-level Governance. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bursens, P., Beyers, J. and Donas, T. (2014) Domestic European union coordination and interest group mobilization in three member states: Looking beyond the formal mechanisms. Regional & Federal Studies 24(3): 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bursens, P. and Deforche, J. (2008) Europeanization of subnational polities: The impact of domestic factors on regional adaptation to European integration. Regional and Federal Studies 18(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bursens, P. and Geeraerts, K. (2006) EU environmental policy‐making in Belgium: Who keeps the gate? Journal of European Integration 28(2): 159–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Bußjäger, P. and Djanani, A. (2009) Europapolitik und Europafähigkeit der Länder in Österreich. In: K.H. Lambertz (ed.) Europapolitik und Europafähigkeit von Regionen. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, pp. 58–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Carroll, W.E. (2011) The Committee of the Regions: A functional analysis of the CoR’s institutional capacity. Regional & Federal Studies 21(3): 341–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carter, C. and Pasquier, R. (2010) The europeanization of regions as ‘spaces for politics’: A research agenda. Regional & Federal Studies 20(3): 295–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carter, C. and Smith, A. (2008) Revitalizing public policy approaches to the EU: ‘Territorial institutionalism’, fisheries and wine. Journal of European Public Policy 15(2): 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chiaramonte, A. and Virgilio, A.Di. (2000) Le elezioni regionali del 2000: la frammentazione si consolida, le alleanze se assestano. Rivista italiana de scienza politica XXX(3): 513–552.Google Scholar
  31. Ciaffi, A. (2001) Il negoziato per l’Obiettivo 2. Federalismo in costruzione. Le Istituzioni del Federalismo XXII(3–4): 447–481.Google Scholar
  32. Colino, C., Molina, I. and Hombrado, A. (2014) Responding to the new Europe and the crisis: The adaptation of sub-national governments’ strategies and its effects on inter-governmental relations in Spain. Regional & Federal Studies 24(3): 281–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Contreras, A.M.C. and Kölling, M. (2013) La participación de las CCAA en la negociación de la política de cohesión ¿Ambitions beyond Capacity? Revista de estudios políticos (161): 239–278.Google Scholar
  34. Corcuera Atienza, F.J. (2001) La patria de los vascos. Orígenes, ideología y organización del nacionalismo vasco (1876–1903). Madrid, Spain: Taurus.Google Scholar
  35. Cormack, M. (1999) Minority languages and television programming policy. International Journal of Cultural Policy 5(2): 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dipartimento per le politiche di sviluppo e di coesione (1998) Cento idee per lo sviluppo. Schede di programma 2000-2006. Catania, Italy: Ministero del Tesoro, del BILANCIO e della Programmazione economica, pp. 10, 54.Google Scholar
  37. Donas, T. and Beyers, J. (2013) How regions assemble in Brussels: The organizational form of territorial representation in the European Union. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 43(4): 527–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Drijber, B.J. (1999) The revised Television Without Frontiers directive: Is it fit for the next century? Common Market Law Review 36(1): 87–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Elias, A. and Tronconi, F. (2011) From protest to power: Autonomist parties in government. Party Politics 17(4): 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Erk, J. (2004) Austria: A federation without federalism. Publius 34(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Erk, J. (2003) Federalism and mass media policy in Germany. Regional and Federal Studies 13(2): 106–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Falkner, G. (2011) The EU’s Decision Traps: Comparing Policies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fargion, V., Morlino, L. and Profeti, S. (2006) Europeanisation and territorial representation in Italy. West European Politics 29(4): 757–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fernández Miranda, P. (1999) La disponibilidad de fondos comunitarios en 1999. Presupuesto y gasto público (22): 141–151.Google Scholar
  45. Fernández Miranda, P. (2000) La agenda 2000: un éxito para España y una oportunidad para la convergencia y el desarrollo de sus regiones. Presupuesto y gasto público (23): 147–162.Google Scholar
  46. Financial Times (2004) Basque vote set to annoy government, 31 January.Google Scholar
  47. Financial Times (2014) Catalans to defy Spanish court on regional vote, 4 November.Google Scholar
  48. García Parreño, M. (2000) La televisión pública, al servicio de intereses privados. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 25, http://www.ull.es/publicaciones/latina/biblio/valencia99/144vamjgarcia.html.
  49. Gobierno Vasco (1998) Posición vasca en relación con la reforma de la política estructural. Una reforma por la eficacia. Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain: Gobierno Vasco – Eusko Jaurlaritza.Google Scholar
  50. Grande, E. (2000) Multi-level governance: Institutionelle Besonderheiten und Funktionsbedindungen des europäischen Mehrebenensystems. In: E. Grande and M. Jachtenfuchs (eds.) Wie problemlösungsfähig ist die EU? Regieren im europäischen Mehrebenensystem. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar
  51. Graziano, P. (2003) La nuova politica regionale italiana: il ruolo dell’europeizzazione. In: S. Fabbrini (ed.) L’europeizzazione dell’Italia. Roma, Italy: Laterza, pp. 80–107.Google Scholar
  52. Gualini, E. (2003) Challenges to multi-level governance: Contradictions and conflicts in the Europeanization of italian regional policy. Journal of European Public Policy 10(4): 616–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Gualini, E. (2004) Multi-level Governace and Institutional Change. The Europeanization of Regional Policy in Italy. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  54. Harcourt, A. (2005) The European Institutions and the Regulation of Media Markets. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Högenauer, A.L. (2014a) All by themselves? Legislative regions and the use of unmediated access to the European level. European Political Science Review 6(3): 451–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Högenauer, A.L. (2014b) Formal rules and informal cooperation: Inter-governmental relations in domestic european policy making in comparative perspective. Regional and Federal Studies 24(3): 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hooghe, L. (1995) Subnational mobilisation in the European Union. West European Politics 18(2): 175–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (1996) ‘Europe with the regions’: Channels of regional representation in the European Union. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 26(1): 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2001) Multi-Level Governance and European Integration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  60. Hooghe, L., Schakel, A.H. and Marks, G. (2008) Appendix B: Country and regional scores. Regional and Federal Studies 18(2): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Hopkin, J. (2009) Party matters. Party Politics 15(2): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hüttmann Große, M. and Knodt, M. (2000) Die Europäisierung des deutschen Föderalismus. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B(52–53): 31–38.Google Scholar
  63. Jeffery, C. (2007a) A Regional Rescue of the Nation-State: Changing Regional Perspectives on Europe. Edinburgh, UK: European Institute and University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  64. Jeffery, C. (ed.) (1997) Farewell the third level? The German Länder and the European policy process. In: The Regional Dimension of the European Union. Towards a Third Level in Europe? London: Frank Cass, pp. 56–75.Google Scholar
  65. Jeffery, C. (2000) Sub-national mobilization and European integration: Does it make any difference? Journal of Common Market Studies 38(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Jeffery, C. (2005) Regions and the European Union: Letting them in, and Leaving Them Alone. In: S. Weatherhill and U. Bernitz (eds.) Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe Role of Regions and Sub-National Actors in Europe. Oxford: Hart, pp. 33–45.Google Scholar
  67. Jeffery, C. (2007b) Towards a new understanding of multi-level governance in Germany? The federalism reform debate and European integration. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 48(1): 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Jensen, M.D. (2014) Game changing – Tracing the positions, strategies and interaction modes of the German Länder towards the (ever expanding?) European Union. Regional & Federal Studies 24(3): 263–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Jensen, M.D., Koop, C. and Tatham, M. (2014) Coping with power dispersion? Autonomy, co-ordination and control in multilevel systems. Journal of European Public Policy 21(9): 1237–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. John, P. and McAteer, M. (1998) Sub-national institutions and the new European governance: UK local authority lobbying strategies for the IGC. Regional and Federal Studies 8(3): 104–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Karlhofer, F. and Pallaver, G. (2013) Strength through weakness: State executive power and federal reform in Austria. Swiss Political Science Review 19(1): 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Keating, M. (1998a) Is there a regional level of government in Europe? In: P. Le Galès and C. Lequesne (eds.) Regions in Europe. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar
  73. Keating, M. (1997) The invention of regions: Political restructuring and territorial government in Western Europe. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 15(4): 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Keating, M. (1998b) The New Regionalism in Western Europe: Territorial Restructuring and Political Change. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  75. Keating, M. and Hooghe, L. (2006) By-passing the nation-state? Regions and the EU policy process. In: J. J. Richardson (ed.) European Union. Power and Policy-making. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  76. King, G., Keohane, R.O. and Verba, S. (1994) Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Kleinsteuber, H.J. and Thomaß, B. (1999) Germany: Continuity of the Länder system and the rise of Urban television. In: M. de Moragas Spà, C. Garitaonandía and B. López (eds.) Television on Your Doorstep. Luton, UK: Luton University Press, pp. 155–186.Google Scholar
  78. Knothe, M. and Bashayan, H. (1997) Die Revision der EG-Fernsehrichtlinie. Ein europäischer Entscheidungsprozeß im Lichte nationaler Kompetenzen. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kommunikationsrecht (6): 849–857.Google Scholar
  79. König, A. (2002) Die EU-Fernsehrichtlinie – Revision oder Abschied? Zeitschrift fur Urheber- und Medienrecht 46(11): 803–814.Google Scholar
  80. Krebber, D. (2002) Europeanisation of Regulatory Television Policy. The Decision-making Process of the Television Without Frontiers Directive from 1989 & 1997. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
  81. León, S. and Ferrín Pereira, M. (2011) Intergovernmental cooperation in a decentralised system: The sectoral conferences in Spain. South European Society and Politics 16(4): 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. López, B., Risquete, J. and Castelló, E. (1999) Spain: Consolidation of the autonomic system in the digital era. In: M. de Moragas Spà, C. Garitaonandía and B. López (eds.) Television on Your Doorstep. Luton, UK: Luton University Press, pp. 333–388.Google Scholar
  83. Loughlin, J. (1997) Representing regions in Europe: The Committee of the Regions. In: C. Jeffery (ed.) The Regional Dimension of the European Union. Towards a Third Level in Europe? London: Frank Cass, pp. 147–165.Google Scholar
  84. Mair, P. (2004) The Europeanization dimension. Journal of European Public Policy 11(2): 337–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Marks, G., Nielsen, F., Raz, L. and Salk, J. (1996) Competencies, cracks and conflicts: Regional mobilization in the European Union. In: G. Marks, F.W. Scharpf, P.C. Schmitter and W. Streeck (eds.) Governance in the European Union. London: SAGE, pp. 40–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Marks, G. (1996) Exploring and explaining variation in EU cohesion policy. In: L. Hooghe (ed.) Cohesion Policy and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 388–422.Google Scholar
  87. Marks, G. (1993) Structural policy and multilevel governance in the EC. In: A.W. Cafruny and G.G. Rosenthal (eds.) The State of the European Community. Vol. 2. The Maastricht Debate and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers and Longman, pp. 391–410.Google Scholar
  88. Marks, G. (1992) Structural policy in the European community. In: A. Sbragia (ed.) Euro-Politics. Institutions and Policy-Making in the ‘New’ European Community. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 191–224.Google Scholar
  89. Marks, G., Haesly, R. and Mbaye, H. (2002) What do subnational offices think they are doing in Brussels? Regional and Federal Studies 12(3): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Massetti, E. and Schakel, A.H. (2013a) Between autonomy and secession decentralization and regionalist party ideological radicalism. Party Politics: 1–21.Google Scholar
  91. Massetti, E. and Schakel, A.H. (2013b) Ideology matters: Why decentralisation has a differentiated effect on regionalist parties’ fortunes in Western democracies. European Journal of Political Research 52(6): 797–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Mayntz, R. and Scharpf, F.W. (1995) Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  93. Mazey, S. and Mitchell, J. (1993) Europe of the regions? Territorial interest and European integration: The Scottish experience. In: S. Mazey and J. Richardson (eds.) Lobbying in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 95–121.Google Scholar
  94. McEwen, N., Swenden, W. and Bolleyer, N. (2012) Intergovernmental relations in the UK: Continuity in a time of change? The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 14(2): 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Menz, G. (2011) Stopping, shaping and moulding Europe: Two-level games, non-state actors and the Europeanization of migration policies. Journal of Common Market Studies 49(2): 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Milward, A.S. (1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-State. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  97. Ministerio de Cultura (1995) Acta de la Conferencia Sectorial sobre el Programa de Trabajo del Consejo de Ministros de Cultura de la Unión Europea durante la Presidencia Española, Madrid, Spain.Google Scholar
  98. Ministero del Tesoro, del Bilancio e della Programmazione Economica (1999) Il Percorso di riforma dei Fondi Strutturali 2000–2006. Roma, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, pp. 33–34.Google Scholar
  99. Ministero del Tesoro, del Bilancio e della Programmazione Economica (2001) Terzo Rapporto sullo sviluppo territoriale 1999–2000. Relazione di sintesi sugli interventi realizzati nelle aree depresse e sui risultati conseguiti. Roma, Italy: Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato, p.68.Google Scholar
  100. Morcillo Laiz, Á. (2009) Contentious Regions and Domestic Structures: The Impact of the European Union on Federal Member States. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
  101. Montero, J. and Brokelmann, H. (1999) Telecomunicaciones y televisión. La nueva regulación en España. Valencia, Spain: Tirant Lo Blanch.Google Scholar
  102. Moore, C. (2008) Beyond conditionality? Regions from the new EU member states and their activities in Brussels. Comparative European politics 6(2): 212–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Moravcsik, A. (1993) Preferences and power in the European community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. Journal of Common Market Studies 31(4): 473–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Neshkova, M.A. (2010) The impact of subnational interests on supranational regulation. Journal of European Public Policy 17(8): 1193–1211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Price, M.E. (1995) Television, the Public Sphere, and National Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Przeworski, A. and Teune, A. (1970) The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  107. Puig, X. (2014) Recomponer el espejo. El País 17 December.Google Scholar
  108. Radaelli, C.M. (2006) Europeanization: Solution or problem? In: M. Cini and A.K. Bourne (eds.) Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 56–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Radaelli, C.M. (2003) The Europeanization of public policy. In: K. Featherstone and C.M. Radaelli (eds.) The Politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Risse, T., Cowles, M.G. and Caporaso, J. (2001) Transforming Europe. Europeanization and Domestic Change. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Ross, A. and Salvador Crespo, M. (2003) The effect of devolution on the implementation of European Community law. European Law Review 28(2): 210–230.Google Scholar
  112. Scharpf, F.W. (1988) The joint-decision trap: Lessons from German federalism and European integration. Public Policy 66(3): 239–278.Google Scholar
  113. Scharpf, F.W. (1992) Einführung: Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen. In: A. Benz, F.W. Scharpf and R. Zintl (eds.) Horizontale Politikverflecthtung. Zur Theorie von Verhandlungssystemen. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Campus, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
  114. Scharpf, F.W. (1994) Optionen des Föderalismus in Deutschland und Europa. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  115. Scharpf, F.W. (1997) Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  116. Scharpf, F.W. (2006) The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies 44(4): 845–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Schmuck, O. (1997) Der Amsterdamer Vertrag aus Sicht der Länder und Regionen. Integration 20(4): 228–235.Google Scholar
  118. Sindicatura de Cuentas (2005) Informe de la Sindicatura de Comptes sobre RTVV any 2001, http://www2.ugt.es/rtvv/, accessed 12 March 2015.
  119. Ştefuriuc, I. (2009) Government formation in multi-level settings. Party Politics 15(1): 93–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Sutcliffe, J.B. (2000) The 1999 reform of the structural funds regulations: Multi-level governance or renationalization. Journal of European Public Policy 7(2): 290–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Swaan, A. de. (2001) Words of the World. The Global Language System. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  122. Swenden, W. (2009) Schottland in Europa: mit oder ohne Vereinigtes Königreich? In: K.-H. Lambertz (ed.) Europapolitik und Europafähigkeit von Regionen. Schriftenreihe des Europäischen Zentrums für Föderalismus-Forschung / Europäisches Zentrum für Föderalismus-Forschung. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos, pp. 101–122.Google Scholar
  123. Swenden, W. and Bolleyer, N. (2014a) Regional mobilization in the ‘New Europe’: A research agenda. Regional & Federal Studies 24(3): 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Swenden, W. and Bolleyer, N. (2014b) Regional mobilization in the new Europe: Old wine in a new bottle? Regional & Federal Studies 24(3): 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Swenden, W. and Maddens, B. (2009) Territorial Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Tatham, M. (2011) Devolution and EU policy-shaping: Bridging the gap between multi-level governance and liberal intergovernmentalism. European Political Science Review 3(1): 53–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Tatham, M. (2008) Going solo: Direct regional representation in the European Union. Regional & Federal Studies 18(5): 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Tatham, M. (2012a) Limited institutional change in an international organization: The EU’s shift away from federal blindness. European Political Science Review 6(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
  129. Tatham, M. (2013) Paradiplomats against the state: Explaining conflict in state and substate interest representation in Brussels. Comparative Political Studies 46(1): 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. Tatham, M. (2014) Same game but more players? Sub-national lobbying in an enlarged union. Regional and Federal Studies 24(3): 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Tatham, M. (2012b) You do what you have to do? Salience and territorial interest representation in EU environmental affairs. European Union Politics 13(3): 434–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Tatham, M. and Bauer, M.W. (2014a) Competence ring-fencing from below? The drivers of regional demands for control over upwards dispersion. Journal of European Public Policy 21(9): 1367–1385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Tatham, M. and Bauer, M.W. (2014b) Support from below? Supranational institutions, regional elites and governance preferences. Journal of Public Policy 34(2): 237–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. Tatham, M. and Thau, M. (2014) The more the merrier: Accounting for regional paradiplomats in Brussels. European Union Politics 15(2): 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. Verge, T. (2013) Party strategies on territorial reform: State-wide parties and the state of autonomies in Spain. West European Politics 36(2): 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Viadel, F. (2010) Premsa, poder i anticatalanisme: la vigència de Las Provincias. Arxius de sociologia (23): 103–112.Google Scholar
  137. Wilson, A. (2009) Coalition formation and party systems in the Italian regions. Regional and Federal Studies 19(1): 57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Zeller, R. (1999) Die EBU. Union Européene de Radio-Télévision (UER); European Broadcasting Union; Internationale Rundfunkkooperation im Wandel. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.División de Estudios Internacionales, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas (CIDE)México D.F.México

Personalised recommendations