Social democratic parties and the rise of ecologism: A comparative analysis of Western Europe

Abstract

The rise of green politics and new social movements posed serious challenges for existing party families. Social democratic parties, in particular, found themselves increasingly crammed between old demands of rising industrial productivity and a stable economic growth on the one hand and new demands regarding ecological sustainability and environmental protection on the other. In this study, I examine the influence of green politics on social democratic party ideologies in Western Europe (N=19) during the last decades of the twentieth century. In the first step of the analysis, I carry out a descriptive examination in order to identify parties where ecological demands are clearly present. Here, the empirical observations indicate that parties domiciling in the northern and central parts of Europe generally have been more prone to establish ecological views than parties in Southern Europe. The second step of the study presents at least indicative evidence regarding possible causes of these ecological shifts. Building on previous research on party change – but using a qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA) in order to detect equifinal and conjunctural causality – I identify four sufficient paths leading to considerable ecological change within social democratic parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Figure 1

Notes

  1. 1.

    I note that the research by Inglehart and his associates has been criticized on several occasions, perhaps most noticeably by Flanagan (1982; see also Inglehart and Flanagan, 1987). These criticisms are, however, not directly relevant for my purposes and does not reject the basic claim that significant value changes took place in western societies during the late twentieth century.

  2. 2.

    The parties included in the study are the Icelandic AF and its successor SF; the Norwegian DNA; the British LP; the Irish LP; the Luxembourgian LSAP; the Greek PASOK; the French PS; the Portuguese PS; the Spanish PSOE; the Dutch PvdA; the Swedish SAP; the Danish SD; the Finnish SDP; the German SPD; the Austrian SPÖ; and the Suisse SPS. The Belgian social democratic party PSB-BSP is succeeded by the Wallonian PS and the Flemish SP in 1977. Both parties are included in the study. The Italian social democratic movement is represented by PSI up until its dissolution in 1994. After this year, the post-communist PDS (founded in 1991, later succeeded by DS and PD) is considered as the main representative of the Italian moderate left. Despite being the successor party of a (euro)communist party (PCI), PDS soon declared its will to connect with the European democratic and socialist tradition, and, as a consequence, applied for membership in the Socialist International (SI). Membership was approved in 1992 (Baccetti, 2003, p. 38).

  3. 3.

    As my focus is on more radical elements of green thinking, I henceforth prefer the somewhat more restricted term ‘ecologism’ instead of more comprehensive and general labels such as ‘environmentalism’ or ‘green politics’.

  4. 4.

    For a detailed description of the content analytical approach used by MARPOR, see, for example, Klingemann et al (2006, pp. 164–194).

  5. 5.

    Here I note that per416 was included in the scheme as late as in the 1980s or, in some cases, the 1990s. Test codings have, however, shown that ‘parties before the beginning of the 1990s hardly ever advocated anti-growth policies’ (Klingemann et al, 2006, p. 157).

  6. 6.

    A total of 279 social democratic documents are included in the study. Of these, 270 (97 per cent) are regular election programmes, 8 (3 per cent) are joint or party bloc programmes and 1 is an estimation on the basis of existing programmes.

  7. 7.

    Theoretically, these projects are primarily inspired by Panebianco (1988) and Harmel and Janda (1994), and by Downs (1957) and Budge (1994), respectively.

  8. 8.

    Some examples hereof are the early Erfurt programme (adopted by the German SPD in 1891) and the post-war Bad Godesberg programme (adopted by SPD in 1959), both of which were later imitated by socialists in other countries.

  9. 9.

    As shown in Table 4, the vast majority (8/11; or 73 per cent) of the parties that changed their positions towards a more pronounced ecologism did so during the 1980s or the very early 1990s. Hence, this time period can be considered as a critical juncture during which there was an increased probability for all (social democratic) parties to take interest in ecological issues. For the cases where no ecological change is observed, I focus on the period before the midpoint of this critical juncture (that is, before 1987).

  10. 10.

    The parties considered are listed in Appendix (see Table A1).

  11. 11.

    For parties with no considerable ecological shift, the year 1987 is used as reference point (cf. Note 9 above).

  12. 12.

    The concepts of necessity and, above all, sufficiency are central to QCA. A condition c is necessary for the outcome o if c is always present when o occurs (in Bayesian probability notation; P(c|o)=1) and if c never is absent when o occurs (P(~c|o)=0). Moreover, a condition c is sufficient for the outcome o if o is always present when c occurs (P(c|o)=1) and if o never is absent when c occurs (P(c|~ o)=0) (see Caramani, 2009, pp. 43–45). To calculate the consistency of a necessary condition (or combination of conditions), the following equation is used:

    The coverage of a (combination of) necessary condition(s), in turn, is measured as

    When calculating the consistency and coverage of sufficient (combinations of) conditions, these two formulas swap so that (2a) gives the coverage and (2b) gives the consistency (cf. Thiem and Duşa, 2013).

  13. 13.

    The basic rule for the minimization is the following: ‘[i]f two Boolean expressions differ in only one causal condition yet produce the same outcome, then the causal condition that distinguishes the two expressions can be considered irrelevant and can be removed to create a simpler, combined expression’ (Ragin, 1987, p. 93).

  14. 14.

    Here I note that organizational change in itself is sufficient for ecological shift (Consistency S (O)=1).

  15. 15.

    In Boolean algebra, ‘∙’ symbolizes conjunction (AND), ‘+’ disjunction (OR) and ‘~’ negation (NOT). The ‘∙’ sign, however, is usually omitted. The minimization is conducted using the QCA-package (Duşa and Thiem, 2012) for R (R Core Team, 2013).

  16. 16.

    An (enhanced) intermediate solution formula for the negated outcome (~E) underlines the importance of good political fortunes (~P) and a stable organization (~O):

  17. 17.

    Whether a (combination of) condition(s) can be considered ‘sufficient more often than not’ can be tested using the binomial probability formula

    where n equals the number of cases displaying the causal combination, k equals the number of cases displaying the outcome, p equals the given benchmark proportion (in this case 0.5; or ‘sufficient more often than not’) and q=1−p (cf. Ragin, 2000, pp. 107–115).

  18. 18.

    Admittedly, the appropriateness of some of the codings and measures used can be discussed. I note, however, that the standard (intermediate) solution is fairly robust to alterations. Below, I report a number of alternative (intermediate) solutions (using frequency criteria to solve possible contradictions):

    (i) With a reduced threshold (4.00) for membership in the outcome (and, similarly, in the condition R):

    ~GP+GRD+G~R~P~D

    (ii) With contradictory cases excluded:

    ~GP+PO+GRD+G~P

    (iii) With all electoral losses included:

    ~GP+PO+GRD+G~R~P~D

    (iv) With all leadership shifts included:

    ~GP+RPD+GROD+G~R~P~D

    (v) With fringe green parties excluded:

    PO+RD+G~R~D→E

    In all, the alternative solutions are either identical (iii), essentially similar (i, ii) or – given the radically changed coding procedure in specifications (iv) and (v) – fairly similar to the original solution formula. The parameters of fit are also rather stable; the consistent solution GRD/GROD/RD reaches the highest coverage (0.38–0.67) in all solution formulas.

References

  1. Adams, J.F. (2012) Causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts in multiparty elections: Theoretical results and empirical evidence. Annual Review of Political Science 15(1): 401–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, J.F., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2004) Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? British Journal of Political Science 34(4): 589–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Adams, J.F., Clark, M., Ezrow, L. and Glasgow, G. (2006) Are niche parties fundamentally different from mainstream parties? The causes and the electoral consequences of Western European parties’ policy shifts, 1976–1998. American Journal of Political Science 50(3): 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams, J.F., Haupt, A.B. and Stoll, H. (2009) What moves parties? The role of public opinion and global economic conditions in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies 42(5): 611–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Adams, J.F. and Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009) Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: Spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39(4): 825–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baccetti, C. (2003) After PCI: Post-communist and neo-communist parties of the Italian left after 1989. In: J. Botella and L. Ramiro (eds.) The Crisis of Communism and Party Change: The Evolution of West European Communist and Post-Communist Parties. Barcelona, Spain: Institut de Ciències Polítiques i Socials, pp. 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Budge, I. (1994) A new spatial theory of party competition: Uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science 24(4): 443–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budge, I., Klingemann, H.D., Volkens, A., Bara, J. and Tanenbaum, E. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carter, N. (2006) Party politicization of the environment in Britain. Party Politics 12(6): 747–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter, N. (2013) Greening the mainstream: Party politics and the environment. Environmental Politics 22(1, special issue): 73–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Caramani, D. (2009) Introduction to the Comparative Method With Boolean Algebra. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Collier, D. and Messick, R.E. (1975) Prerequisites versus diffusion: Testing alternative explanations of social security adoption. American Political Science Review 69(4): 1299–1315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dalton, R.J. (2009) Economics, environmentalism and party alignments: A note on partisan change in advanced industrial democracies. European Journal of Political Research 48(2): 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Day, A.J. (ed.) (2002) Political Parties of the World, 5th edn. London: John Harper Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  15. De Deken, J.J. (1999) The German social democratic party. In: R. Ladrech and P. Marliére (eds.) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press, pp. 79–94.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. De Meur, G., Rihoux, B. and Yamasaki, S. (2009) Addressing the critiques of QCA. In: B. Rihoux and C.C. Ragin (eds.) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 147–165.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Dobson, A. (2001) Green Political Thought, 3rd edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Driver, S. and Martell, L. (2002) Third ways in Britain and Europe. In: O. Schmidtke (ed.) The Third Way Transformation of Social Democracy: Normative Claims and Policy Initiatives in the 21st Century. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, pp. 75–101.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Duşa, A. and Thiem, A. (2012) QCA: Qualitative Comparative Analysis. R Package version 1.0–5.

  21. Ezrow, L., De Vries, C.E., Steenbergen, M. and Edwards, E. (2011) Mean voter representation and Partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter or to their supporters? Party Politics 17(3): 275–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fitzmaurice, J. (1999) The Luxembourg socialist workers’ party. In: R. Ladrech and P. Marliére (eds.) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press, pp. 148–154.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Flanagan, S.C. (1982) Changing values in advanced industrial societies: Inglehart’s silent revolution from the perspective of Japanese findings. Comparative Political Studies 14(4): 403–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gemenis, K. (2013) What to do (and not to do) with the comparative manifestos project data. Political Studies 61(S1): 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harmel, R., Heo, U., Tan, A.C. and Janda, K. (1995) Performance, leadership, factions and party change: An empirical analysis. West European Politics 18(1): 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Harmel, R. and Janda, K. (1994) An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(3): 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Harmel, R., Shan, W. and Rossbach, D. (2008) Do party leaders matter? Impacts of leader change on party change. In: K. Kosiara-Pedersen and P. Kurrild-Klitgaard (eds.) Partier og partisystemer i forandring: Festskrift til Lars Bille. Odense, Denmark: Syddansk Universitetsforlag, pp. 83–107.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Harmel, R. and Svåsand, L. (1997) The influence of new parties on old parties’ platforms: The cases of the progress parties and conservative parties of Denmark and Norway. Party Politics 3(3): 315–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Harmel, R. and Tan, A.C. (2003) Party actors and party change: Does factional dominance matter? European Journal of Political Research 42(3): 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Haupt, A.B. (2010) Parties’ responses to economic globalization: What is left for the left and right for the right? Party Politics 16(1): 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Inglehart, R.F. (1977) The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Inglehart, R.F. (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Inglehart, R.F. (1997) Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Inglehart, R.F. (2008) Changing values among Western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics 31(1–2): 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Inglehart, R.F. and Flanagan, S.C. (1987) Value change in industrial societies. American Political Science Review 81(4): 1289–1319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Inglehart, R.F. and Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Jacobs, F. (ed.) (1989) Western European Political Parties: A comprehensive Guide. Harlow, UK: Longman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Jahn, D. (2014) The diffusion of party positions: Policy positions moving from the Nordic to the Baltic states. In: N. Aylott (ed.) Models of Democracy in Nordic and Baltic Europe: Political Institutions and Discourse. Farnham, UK: Ashgate, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Jahn, D. and Henn, M. (2000) The ‘new’ rhetoric of new labour in comparative perspective: A three-country discourse analysis. West European Politics 23(1): 26–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Janda, K., Harmel, R., Edens, C. and Goff, P. (1995) Changes in party identity: Evidence from party manifestos. Party Politics 1(2): 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kitschelt, H.P. (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  44. Klingemann, H.-D., Volkens, A., Bara, J., Budge, I. and McDonald, M.D. (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD. 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ladrech, R. and Marliére, P. (eds.) (1999) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Luther, K.R. (1999) The social democratic party of Austria. In: R. Ladrech and P. Marliére (eds.) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press, pp. 16–29.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Marx, A. (2010) Crisp-set qualitative analysis (csQCA) and model specification: Benchmarks for future csQCA applications. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches 4(2): 138–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Meguid, B.M. (2008) Party Competition Between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  49. Meyer, T.M. (2013) Constraints on Party Policy Change. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. O’Riordan, T. (1976) Environmentalism. London: Pion.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Offe, C. (1985) New social movements: Challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research 52(4): 817–868.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Padgett, S. (1993) The German social democrats: A redefinition of social democracy or Bad Godesberg mark II? West European Politics 16(1, special issue): 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Padgett, S. (1994) The German social democratic party: Between old and new left. In: D.S. Bell and E. Shaw (eds.) Conflict and Cohesion in Western European Social Democratic Parties. London: Pinter Publishers, pp. 10–30.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Padgett, S. and Paterson, W.E. (1991) A History of Social Democracy in Postwar Europe. Harlow, UK: Longman Group.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power, Translated by M. Silver. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Paterson, W.E. and Sloam, J. (2006) Is the left alright? The SPD and the renewal of European social democracy. German Politics 15(3): 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Poguntke, T. (1987) New politics and party systems: The emergence of a new type of party? West European Politics 10(1): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  59. Ragin, C.C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Ragin, C.C. (2000) Fuzzy-set Social Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ragin, C.C. (2008) Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  62. Rihoux, B. (2006) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology 21(5): 679–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rihoux, B., Álamos-Concha, P., Bol, D., Marx, A. and Rezsöhazy, I. (2013) From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly 66(1): 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rihoux, B. and De Meur, G. (2009) Crisp-set qualitative comparative analysis (csQCA). In: B. Rihoux and C.C. Ragin (eds.) Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, pp. 33–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  65. Rohrschneider, R. (1993) New party versus old left realignments: Environmental attitudes, party policies, and partisan affiliations in four West European Countries. Journal of Politics 55(3): 682–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sassoon, D. (1996) One Hundred Years of Socialism: The West European Left in the Twentieth Century. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2007) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) und Fuzzy sets: Ein Lehrbuch für Anwender und jene, die es werden wollen. Opladen, Germany: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Schneider, C.Q. and Wagemann, C. (2012) Set-theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  69. Schumacher, G., Vis, B. and de Vries, C.E. (2013) Why do parties change positions: Party organization and environmental incentives. Journal of Politics 75(2): 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Somer, Z. (2005) Change of the social democrats: The influence of left-libertarian parties on social democratic manifestos. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Midwest Political Science Association; April, Chicago, IL.

  71. Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009) Timely decisions: The effects of past national elections on party policy change. Journal of Politics 71(1): 238–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Sundberg, J. (1999) The Finnish social democratic party. In: R. Ladrech and P. Marliére (eds.) Social Democratic Parties in the European Union: History, Organization, Policies. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan Press, pp. 56–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  73. Thiem, A. and Duşa, A. (2013) Qualitative Comparative Analysis with R: A User’s Guide. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  74. Thomas, A.H. (1977) A note on Switzerland. In: W.E. Paterson and A.H. Thomas (eds.) Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe. London: Croom Helm, pp. 429–431.

    Google Scholar 

  75. Volkens, A. (2007) Strengths and weaknesses of approaches to measuring policy positions of parties. Electoral Studies 26(1): 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ward, H., Ezrow, L. and Dorussen, H. (2011) Globalization, party positions, and the median voter. World Politics 63(3): 509–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wolinetz, S.B. (1977) The Dutch labour party: A social democratic party in transition. In: W.E. Paterson and A.H. Thomas (eds.) Social Democratic Parties in Western Europe. London: Croom Helm, pp. 342–388.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Fagerholm.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A1

Table A1 Rival parties considered in the study

Table A2

Table A2 Diffusion patterns within West European social democracy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fagerholm, A. Social democratic parties and the rise of ecologism: A comparative analysis of Western Europe. Comp Eur Polit 14, 547–571 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2014.34

Download citation

Keywords

  • political parties
  • party ideologies
  • party change
  • social democracy
  • ecologism
  • qualitative comparative analysis