Advertisement

Comparative European Politics

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 1–17 | Cite as

European Union issue voting in East and West Europe: The role of political context

  • Catherine E de VriesEmail author
  • Erik R Tillman
Original Article

Abstract

Recent research has shown the rise of domestic contention over European integration. This paper examines the extent to which preferences over European integration influence domestic party support in 19 European Union (EU) member states in West and East-Central Europe (ECE). The analysis finds broad evidence of EU issue voting across the countries included in the analysis, but the effect of the EU issue on party preferences is stronger in ECE. These results are consistent with the view that the same underlying causal dynamics explain party and voter behavior in both West and ECE, but the post-communist legacy shapes the political and economic contexts in the ECE states, resulting in predictable differences between the two regions.

Keywords

elections, voting behavior, European integration, East-Central Europe, West Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Catherine E. de Vries acknowledges the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) for providing financial support for this research (VENI GRANT 451-08-001). Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the 2007 Meeting of the MPSA in Chicago and the 2007 ECPR General in Pisa. The authors would like to thank all participants for their input. Remaining errors are the sole responsibility of the authors.

References

  1. Brambor, T., Clark, W. and Golder, M. (2006) Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis 14: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carey, S. (2002) Undivided loyalties: Is national identity an obstacle to European integration? European Union Politics 3: 387–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carrubba, C.J. (2001) The electoral connection in European Union politics. Journal of Politics 63: 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cichowski, R.A. (2000) Western dreams, eastern realities: Support for the European Union in Central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Political Studies 33: 1243–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vries, C.E. (2007) Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale? How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics 8: 363–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Vries, C.E. (2009) The impact of EU referenda on national electoral politics: Evidence from the Dutch case. West European Politics 32: 142–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Down, I. and Wilson, C.J. (2008) From ‘permissive consensus’ to ‘constraining dissensus’: A polarizing union? Acta Politica 43: 26–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, E.E. (2007) United we stand? Intra-party dissent in the EU on issues of European integration. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association; 12–15 April 2007, Chicago.Google Scholar
  9. Elgün, Ö. and Tillman, E.R. (2007) Exposure to European Union policies and support for membership in the candidate countries. Political Research Quarterly 60: 391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gabel, M. (1998) Interests and Integration: Market Liberalization, Public Opinion, and European Union. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gabel, M. (2000) European integration, voters, and national politics. West European Politics 23: 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2005) Calculation, community, and cues. European Union Politics 6: 419–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2007) Economic models of voting. In: R.J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingemann (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Political Behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 518–537.Google Scholar
  14. MacDonald, S.E., Listhaug, O. and Rabinowitz, G. (1991) Issues and party support in multiparty systems. American Political Science Review 84: 1107–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Nelson, M. and Edwards, E. (2006) Party competition and European integration in the East and West: Different structure, same causality. Comparative Political Studies 39: 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2000) The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30: 433–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mattila, M. and Raunio, T. (2006) Cautious voters–supportive parties: Opinion congruence between voters and parties on the EU dimension. European Union Politics 7: 427–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McLaren, L. (2002) Public support for the European Union: Cost/benefit analysis or perceived cultural threat? Journal of Politics 64: 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oppenhuis, E. (1995) Voting Behaviour in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of Electoral Participation and Party Choice. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  20. Rohrschneider, R. and Whitefield, S. (2006) Political parties, public opinion, and European integration in post-communist countries: The state of the art. European Union Politics 7: 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rohrschneider, R. and Whitefield, S. (2007) Representation in new democracies: Party stances on European integration in post-communist Eastern Europe. Journal of Politics 69: 1133–1146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schoen, H. (2008) Turkey's bid for EU membership, contrasting views of public opinion, and vote choice. Evidence from the 2005 German federal election. Electoral Studies 27: 344–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Steenbergen, M.R., Edwards, E.E. and de Vries, C.E. (2007) Who's cueing whom? Mass–elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics 8: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tillie, J. (1995) Party Utility and Voting Behavior. Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.Google Scholar
  25. Tillman, E.R. (2004) The European Union at the ballot box? European integration and voting behavior in the new member states. Comparative Political Studies 37: 590–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tworzecki, H. (2003) Learning to Choose: Electoral Politics in East-Central Europe. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Tucker, J.A. (2006) Regional Economic Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tucker, J.A., Pacek, A.C. and Berinsky, A.J. (2002) Transitional winners and losers: Attitudes toward EU membership in post-communist countries. American Journal of Political Science 46: 557–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van der Brug, W., Franklin, M.N. and Toka, G. (2008) One electorate or many? Differences in party preference formation between new and established European democracies. Electoral Studies 27: 589–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van der Brug, W., van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds.) European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 33–50.Google Scholar
  32. van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (2007) The sleeping giant: The potential for political mobilization of disaffection with European integration. In: W. van der Brug and C. van der Eijk (eds.) European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 189–208.Google Scholar
  33. van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M.N. and van der Brug, W. (1999) Policy preferences and party choice. In: H. Schmitt and J. Thomassen (eds.) Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 163–187.Google Scholar
  34. van der Eijk, C. and Niemöller, B. (1983) Electoral Change in the Netherlands. The Hague: CT Press.Google Scholar
  35. van der Eijk, C., van der Brug, W., Kroh, M. and Franklin, M.N. (2006) Rethinking the dependent variable in voting behavior: On the measurement and analysis of electoral utilities. Electoral Studies 25: 424–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations