British Politics

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 324–346

David Cameron’s EU renegotiation and referendum pledge: A case of déjà vu?

  • Julie Smith
Original Article

Abstract

The UK’s relationship with the European Union (EU) has long been fraught, creating tensions with European partners and dividing the main political parties. To try to overcome internal divisions in the Labour Party, Harold Wilson sought to renegotiate the UK’s terms of membership and then held a referendum on whether the country should stay in. The result – a two to one majority in favour of remaining – was thought to have ended the question marks over British membership definitively. Four decades later, it was the Conservatives who were divided over Europe and Prime Minister David Cameron, in what appeared to be almost a carbon copy of Wilson’s actions, promising reform, renegotiation and a referendum. Yet the stakes in 2016 were rather higher than in 1975 and the challenges far greater – the more multi-faceted and institutionalised nature of the EU rendered the debate, and the potential costs and benefits, more complex. This article assesses the similarities between the two prime ministers’ decisions to renegotiate the UK’s terms of membership and the frameworks established for the ensuing referendums and notes significant differences that render over-interpreting the parallels a risky business.

Keywords

The United Kingdom and the European Union 1975 referendum EU renegotiation 2016 EU referendum David Cameron Harold Wilson 

References

  1. Bagehot (2016) Bagehot’s notebook: An interview with Dominic Cummings The Economist 21 (January).Google Scholar
  2. Bogdanor, V. (2005) Constitutional reform in Britain: The quiet revolution. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 73–98, http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Butler, D. and Kitzinger, U. (1996) The 1975 Referendum, 2nd edn. Basingstoke, UK; London: Palgrave Macmillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cameron, D. (2015) Speech at Chatham House, 10 November.Google Scholar
  5. Cameron, D. (2015a) ‘A New Settlement for the United Kingdom in a Reformed European Union’, Letter to the President of the European Council, 10 November.Google Scholar
  6. Cameron, D. (2016) House of Commons Hansard, 5 January col. 26.Google Scholar
  7. Cameron, D. (2016a) Speech to world economic forum, Davos on 21 January 2016, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/davos-2016-prime-ministers-speech-to-the-world-economic-forum, accessed 22 January 2016.
  8. Cameron, D. (2016b) House of Commons Hansard, 22 February 2016, col. 24.Google Scholar
  9. Camps, M. (1993) Missing the boat at Messina and other times? In: B. Brivati and H. Jones (eds.) From Reconstruction to Integration – Britain and Europe Since 1945. London; Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press, pp. 134–143.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, H.D., Kellner, P., Stewart, M.C., Twyman, J. and Whiteley, P. (2016) Austerity and Political Choice in Britain. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clegg, N. (2000) Doing Less to Do More: A New Focus for the EU. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
  12. Conservatives (2015) Strong Leadership; A Clear Economic Plan; A Brighter, More Secure Future, Party Manifesto. London: Conservative Party.Google Scholar
  13. Copsey, N. and Haughton, T. (2014) Farewell britannia? ‘Issue capture’ and the politics of David Cameron’s 2013 EU referendum pledge. Journal of Common Market Studies Annual Review 52: 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Donoughue, B. (1993) Harold Wilson and the renegotiation of the EEC terms of membership, 1974–75: A witness account. In: B. Brivati and H. Jones (eds.) From Reconstruction to Integration: Britain and Europe Since 1945. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Electoral Commission (2015) Referendum on membership of the European Union: Assessment of the Electoral Commission on the proposed referendum question, http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/192075/EU-referendum-question-assessment-report.pdf, accessed 24 January 2016.
  16. European Council (2016) European Council meeting (18 and 19 February 2016) – Conclusions, EUCO 1/16, CO EUR 1 CONCL 1, Brussels, Belgium, 19 February 2016.Google Scholar
  17. Farage, N., Pursglove, T. and Hoey, K. (2016) Leaving the EU is more important than party politics. The Daily Telegraph 6 January, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12085693/Leaving-the-EU-is-more-important-than-party-politics.html, accessed 11 January 2016.
  18. Field, M. (2015) Why Ministers who want to leave the EU should resign, http://markfieldmp.com/news-a-articles/why-ministers-who-want-to-leave-eu-should-resign/, accessed 10 January 2016.
  19. Fossum, J.E. (2015) Representation under hegemony? On Norway’s relationship to the EU, In: Eriksen, E.O. and Fossum, J.E. (eds.) The European Union’s Non-Members – Independence Under Hegemony? London: Routledge, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
  20. Glencross, A. (2015) Why a British referendum on EU membership will not solve the Europe question. International Affairs 91(2): 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodhart, P. (1971) Referendum. London: Tom Stacy.Google Scholar
  22. Goodwin, M. and Milazzo, C. (2015) Britain, the European Union and the referendum: What drives euroscepticism? Europe Programme Briefing. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
  23. Guardian (2015) Lord Lawson to lead Conservative leave campaign, 1 October, http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/01/lord-lawson-conservative-leave-eu, accessed 24 January 2016.
  24. Haeussler, M. (2015) A pyrrhic victory: Harold Wilson, Helmut Schmidt, and the British renegotiation of EC membership, 1974–5. The International History Review 37(4): 768–789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoey, K. (2015) Why leaving the EU is a left-wing move. The Independent 9 October 2015, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/labour-mp-kate-hoey-why-leaving-the-eu-is-a-left-wing-move-a6687936.html, accessed 24 January 2016.
  26. Hope, C. (2015) ‘Aaron Banks’ Leave.EU launches formal bid to merge with rival Vote Leave’. Daily Telegraph 23 November, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12012083/Arron-Banks-Leave.EU-referendum-campaign-launches-formal-bid-to-merge-with-rival-Vote-Leave.html, accessed 11 January 2016.
  27. HM Government (2016) The Best of Both Worlds: The United Kingdom’s Special Status in a Reformed European Union. London: FCO.Google Scholar
  28. Leigh, M. (1975) Linkage politics: The french referendum and the Paris summit of 1972’. Journal of Common Market Studies 14(2): 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lynch, P. (2015) Conservative modernisation and european integration: From silence to salience and schism. British Politics 10(2): 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Major, J. (1999) The Autobiography. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  31. von Ondarza, N. (2016) Core Europe and the United Kingdom. SWP Comments 6. Berlin, Germany: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
  32. O’Neill, C. (2000) Britain’s Entry into the European Community – Report on the Negotiations of 1970–1972. London: Frank Cass, edited and with a foreword by Sir David Hannay.Google Scholar
  33. Piris, J.-C. (2016) If the UK Votes to Leave – The Seven Alternatives to EU Membership. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
  34. Radice, L. (2015) House of lords second reading of the EU referendum bill, Hansard, 13 October, col, 124–125.Google Scholar
  35. Seymour-Ure, C. (1996) ‘Press’ in Butler and Kitzinger 1996, pp. 214–45.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, J. (1999) The 1975 referendum. Journal of European Integration History 5(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, J. (2015) Europe: The coalition’s poisoned chalice. In: A. Seldon and M. Finn (eds.) The Coalition Effect, 2010–15. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 372–398.Google Scholar
  38. Smith, J. (forthcoming) National parliaments and the European Union – A view from Westminster. In: D. Jancic (ed.) National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Spreckley, N. (1975) The Common Market Renegotiation and Referendum 1974–75, Parts 1 and 2 and Appendix FCO historians, https://issuu.com/fcohistorians/docs/1_spreckley_report_-_part_1, https://issuu.com/fcohistorians/docs/2_spreckley_report_-_part_2 and https://issuu.com/fcohistorians/docs/3_spreckley_report_-_part_3_appendi, accessed 16 May 2016.Google Scholar
  40. Thomson, Lord of Monifieth (1999) ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: the British Arrival in Brussels in 1973,’ The 1999 FCO Annual Lecture No. 16, London: FCO Historians.Google Scholar
  41. Wall, S. (2012) The Official History of Britain and the European Community Vol. 2 From Rejection to Referendum, 1963–75. Abingdon; New York: Whitehall Histories-Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Wall, S. (2014) Foreword to Spreckley (1975).Google Scholar
  43. Wallace, M. (2016) ‘The pros and cons of a second EU referendum’, Conservative Home, http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2016/01/the-pros-and-cons-of-a-second-eu-referendum.html, accessed 22 January 2016.
  44. Wallace, W. (1975) Europe: the changing international context – Implications for British Policy. The World Today May: 177–213.Google Scholar
  45. Young, H. (1998) This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julie Smith
    • 1
  1. 1.Baroness Smith of Newnham, Robinson CollegeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations