David Cameron’s EU renegotiation and referendum pledge: A case of déjà vu?
The UK’s relationship with the European Union (EU) has long been fraught, creating tensions with European partners and dividing the main political parties. To try to overcome internal divisions in the Labour Party, Harold Wilson sought to renegotiate the UK’s terms of membership and then held a referendum on whether the country should stay in. The result – a two to one majority in favour of remaining – was thought to have ended the question marks over British membership definitively. Four decades later, it was the Conservatives who were divided over Europe and Prime Minister David Cameron, in what appeared to be almost a carbon copy of Wilson’s actions, promising reform, renegotiation and a referendum. Yet the stakes in 2016 were rather higher than in 1975 and the challenges far greater – the more multi-faceted and institutionalised nature of the EU rendered the debate, and the potential costs and benefits, more complex. This article assesses the similarities between the two prime ministers’ decisions to renegotiate the UK’s terms of membership and the frameworks established for the ensuing referendums and notes significant differences that render over-interpreting the parallels a risky business.
KeywordsThe United Kingdom and the European Union 1975 referendum EU renegotiation 2016 EU referendum David Cameron Harold Wilson
- Bagehot (2016) Bagehot’s notebook: An interview with Dominic Cummings The Economist 21 (January).Google Scholar
- Bogdanor, V. (2005) Constitutional reform in Britain: The quiet revolution. Annual Review of Political Science 8: 73–98, http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2015) Speech at Chatham House, 10 November.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2015a) ‘A New Settlement for the United Kingdom in a Reformed European Union’, Letter to the President of the European Council, 10 November.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2016) House of Commons Hansard, 5 January col. 26.Google Scholar
- Cameron, D. (2016a) Speech to world economic forum, Davos on 21 January 2016, https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/davos-2016-prime-ministers-speech-to-the-world-economic-forum, accessed 22 January 2016.
- Cameron, D. (2016b) House of Commons Hansard, 22 February 2016, col. 24.Google Scholar
- Camps, M. (1993) Missing the boat at Messina and other times? In: B. Brivati and H. Jones (eds.) From Reconstruction to Integration – Britain and Europe Since 1945. London; Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press, pp. 134–143.Google Scholar
- Clegg, N. (2000) Doing Less to Do More: A New Focus for the EU. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
- Conservatives (2015) Strong Leadership; A Clear Economic Plan; A Brighter, More Secure Future, Party Manifesto. London: Conservative Party.Google Scholar
- Donoughue, B. (1993) Harold Wilson and the renegotiation of the EEC terms of membership, 1974–75: A witness account. In: B. Brivati and H. Jones (eds.) From Reconstruction to Integration: Britain and Europe Since 1945. Leicester, UK: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
- Electoral Commission (2015) Referendum on membership of the European Union: Assessment of the Electoral Commission on the proposed referendum question, http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/192075/EU-referendum-question-assessment-report.pdf, accessed 24 January 2016.
- European Council (2016) European Council meeting (18 and 19 February 2016) – Conclusions, EUCO 1/16, CO EUR 1 CONCL 1, Brussels, Belgium, 19 February 2016.Google Scholar
- Farage, N., Pursglove, T. and Hoey, K. (2016) Leaving the EU is more important than party politics. The Daily Telegraph 6 January, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12085693/Leaving-the-EU-is-more-important-than-party-politics.html, accessed 11 January 2016.
- Field, M. (2015) Why Ministers who want to leave the EU should resign, http://markfieldmp.com/news-a-articles/why-ministers-who-want-to-leave-eu-should-resign/, accessed 10 January 2016.
- Fossum, J.E. (2015) Representation under hegemony? On Norway’s relationship to the EU, In: Eriksen, E.O. and Fossum, J.E. (eds.) The European Union’s Non-Members – Independence Under Hegemony? London: Routledge, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
- Goodhart, P. (1971) Referendum. London: Tom Stacy.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, M. and Milazzo, C. (2015) Britain, the European Union and the referendum: What drives euroscepticism? Europe Programme Briefing. London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
- Guardian (2015) Lord Lawson to lead Conservative leave campaign, 1 October, http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/oct/01/lord-lawson-conservative-leave-eu, accessed 24 January 2016.
- Hoey, K. (2015) Why leaving the EU is a left-wing move. The Independent 9 October 2015, http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/labour-mp-kate-hoey-why-leaving-the-eu-is-a-left-wing-move-a6687936.html, accessed 24 January 2016.
- Hope, C. (2015) ‘Aaron Banks’ Leave.EU launches formal bid to merge with rival Vote Leave’. Daily Telegraph 23 November, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/eureferendum/12012083/Arron-Banks-Leave.EU-referendum-campaign-launches-formal-bid-to-merge-with-rival-Vote-Leave.html, accessed 11 January 2016.
- HM Government (2016) The Best of Both Worlds: The United Kingdom’s Special Status in a Reformed European Union. London: FCO.Google Scholar
- Major, J. (1999) The Autobiography. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
- von Ondarza, N. (2016) Core Europe and the United Kingdom. SWP Comments 6. Berlin, Germany: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.Google Scholar
- O’Neill, C. (2000) Britain’s Entry into the European Community – Report on the Negotiations of 1970–1972. London: Frank Cass, edited and with a foreword by Sir David Hannay.Google Scholar
- Piris, J.-C. (2016) If the UK Votes to Leave – The Seven Alternatives to EU Membership. London: Centre for European Reform.Google Scholar
- Radice, L. (2015) House of lords second reading of the EU referendum bill, Hansard, 13 October, col, 124–125.Google Scholar
- Seymour-Ure, C. (1996) ‘Press’ in Butler and Kitzinger 1996, pp. 214–45.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. (1999) The 1975 referendum. Journal of European Integration History 5(1): 41–56.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. (2015) Europe: The coalition’s poisoned chalice. In: A. Seldon and M. Finn (eds.) The Coalition Effect, 2010–15. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 372–398.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. (forthcoming) National parliaments and the European Union – A view from Westminster. In: D. Jancic (ed.) National Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty and the Euro Crisis: Resilience or Resignation?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Spreckley, N. (1975) The Common Market Renegotiation and Referendum 1974–75, Parts 1 and 2 and Appendix FCO historians, https://issuu.com/fcohistorians/docs/1_spreckley_report_-_part_1, https://issuu.com/fcohistorians/docs/2_spreckley_report_-_part_2 and https://issuu.com/fcohistorians/docs/3_spreckley_report_-_part_3_appendi, accessed 16 May 2016.Google Scholar
- Thomson, Lord of Monifieth (1999) ‘Journey to an Unknown Destination: the British Arrival in Brussels in 1973,’ The 1999 FCO Annual Lecture No. 16, London: FCO Historians.Google Scholar
- Wall, S. (2012) The Official History of Britain and the European Community Vol. 2 From Rejection to Referendum, 1963–75. Abingdon; New York: Whitehall Histories-Routledge.Google Scholar
- Wall, S. (2014) Foreword to Spreckley (1975).Google Scholar
- Wallace, M. (2016) ‘The pros and cons of a second EU referendum’, Conservative Home, http://www.conservativehome.com/thetorydiary/2016/01/the-pros-and-cons-of-a-second-eu-referendum.html, accessed 22 January 2016.
- Wallace, W. (1975) Europe: the changing international context – Implications for British Policy. The World Today May: 177–213.Google Scholar
- Young, H. (1998) This Blessed Plot: Britain and Europe from Churchill to Blair. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar