Enemies of the state: Proscription powers and their use in the United Kingdom
- 182 Downloads
This article assesses the use of proscription powers as a tool for countering terrorism, using the United Kingdom as a case study. The article begins with a brief overview of the United Kingdom’s current proscription regime. It then situates this in historical context, noting the significant recent increase in proscribed groups and the predominance of ‘Islamist’ organisations therein. The article then critiques proscription on four principal grounds. First, in terms of the challenges of identifying and designating proscribed groups. Second, we highlight the considerable domestic and transnational politicking that surrounds proscription decisions. Third, we assess the normative importance of protecting scope for political resistance and freedoms of expression and organisation. And, fourth, we question the efficacy of proscription as a counter-terrorism tool. The article concludes by arguing that proscription’s place in contemporary security politics should be heavily safeguarded given these challenges, before pointing to specific policy recommendations to this end.
Keywordsproscription counter-terrorism anti-terrorism terrorism the United Kingdom
The authors would like to thank the editors and anonymous reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments.
- Allen, F.A. (1996) The Habits of Legality: Criminal Justice and the Rule of Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Baber, M. (1999) The Terrorism Bill: Bill 10 of 1999–2000, Research Paper 99/101. London: House of Commons Library, Retrieved from http://www.parliament.uk/briefing-papers/rp99-101.pdf, accessed 21 October 2013.
- Barendt, E. (2005) Threats to Freedom of Speech in the United Kingdom. The University of New South Wales Law Journal 28 (3): 895–889.Google Scholar
- BBC News. (2010) ‘Islam4UK Islamist group banned under terror laws’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8453560.stm, accessed 12 January 2010.
- Blackbourn, J. (2008) Counter-terrorism and civil liberties: The United Kingdom experience, 1968–2008. The Journal of the Institute of Justice & International Studies 8: 63.Google Scholar
- Blair, T. (2010) A Journey: My Political Life. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- Bronitt, S. (2003) Australia’s legal response to terrorism: Neither novel nor extraordinary? Paper presented at the Castan Centre For Human Rights Law Conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Burke, J. (2003) Al-Qaeda: Casting a Shadow of Terror. London: IB Tauris & Company.Google Scholar
- Burnett, J. and Whyte, D. (2005) Embedded Expertise and the New Terrorism. Journal for Crime, Conflict and the Media 1 (4): 1–18.Google Scholar
- Clarke, C. (2000) Evidence to Standing Committee D. House of Commons Hansard, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmstand/d/st000120/am/00120s06.htm, accessed 20 January 2000.
- Counter-Terrorism Act. (2008) London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Cronin, A.K. (2009) How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, R.N. (2008) Proscribing terrorist organisations: Legislation and practice in five English-speaking democracies. 32 Criminal Law Journal 90 (2): 90–99.Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, A. (2007) Preparation for terrorism: Catastrophic risk and precautionary criminal law. In: A. Lynch, E. MacDonald and G. Williams (eds.) Law and Liberty and the War on Terror. Sydney: Federation Press, pp. 59–74.Google Scholar
- Gross, J. (2010) Talking with terrorists: Terrorist groups and the challenge of legitimization. Journal of Public and International Affairs 21: 93–114.Google Scholar
- Gross, J. (2011) Proscription problems: The practical implications of terrorist lists on diplomacy and peacebuilding in Nepal. Praxis 26: 38–59.Google Scholar
- Hansard HL. (2000) Debates, 6 April, Column 1431. [Electronic version].Google Scholar
- Hansard HL. (2001a) Debates, 27 March, Column 148. [Electronic version].Google Scholar
- Hansard HL. (2001b) Debates 27 March, Column 152−153. [Electronic version].Google Scholar
- Hansard HL. (2001c) Debates 27 March, Column 172. [Electronic version].Google Scholar
- Hansard HL. (2001d) Debates 27 March,Vol. 624, Column 173. [Electronic version].Google Scholar
- Hewitt, S. (2008) The British War on Terror: Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism on the Home Front since 9/11. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Hogg, R. (2008) Executive proscription of terrorist organisations in Australia: Exploring the shifting border between crime and politics. In: M. Gani and P. Mathew (eds.) Fresh Perspectives on the ‘War on Terror’. Canberra, Australia: ANU E Press, pp. 297–323.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (1998) Legislation Against Terrorism: A Consultation Paper. London: The Stationary Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (2011) Explanatory Memorandum to the Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment Order) 2011 No. 1771. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (2012) Explanatory Memorandum to the Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) (No.2) Order 2012. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (2013a) Explanatory Memorandum to the Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2013 No. 1746. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Home Office. (2013b) Proscribed Terrorist Organisations. London: HM Government, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224213/2012-07-19-List_of_Proscribed_organisations.pdf, accessed 12 January 2014.Google Scholar
- Home Office and Northern Ireland Office. (2000) Supplementary Memorandum by the Home Office and Northern Ireland Office, in Delegated Powers and Deregulation – Twelfth Report. Select Committee on Delegated Powers and Deregulation. House of Lords: Hansard, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/lddereg/57/5701.htm, accessed 3 June 2013.
- Hughes, S. (2000) Standing Committee D. 2nd Sitting. House of Commons: Hansard, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm199900/cmstand/d/st000120/am/00120s06.htm, accessed 20 January.
- Jarvis, L. (2012) Al Qaeda: A diminishing threat. In: R. Jackson and S.J. Sinclair (eds.) Contemporary Debates on Terrorism. London: Routledge, pp. 97–103.Google Scholar
- Lia, B. (2008) Al-Qaida’s appeal: Understanding its unique selling points. Perspectives on Terrorism 2 (8): 3–10.Google Scholar
- Lord Carlile of Berriew QC. (2010) Report on the Operation in 2009 of the Terrorism Act 2000 and of Part 1 of the Terrorism Act 2006. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Lord Lloyd of Berwick, the Rt Hon. (1996) The Inquiry into Legislation against Terrorism. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Lynch, A., McGarrity, N. and Williams, G. (2009) Proscription of terrorist organisations in Australia. The Federal Law Review 37 (1): 25–45.Google Scholar
- Macdonald, S. (2012) Understanding anti-terrorism policy: Values, rationales and principles. Sydney Law Review 34 (2): 317–395.Google Scholar
- May, T. (2011) Quoted in ‘Britain moves to ban Pakistani Taliban under terror law statement’. Reuters, 18 January, http://uk.reuters.com/article/2011/01/18/us-britain-taliban-idUKTRE70H2CV20110118, accessed 28 May 2013.
- May, T. (2013) Interview. The Andrew Marr Show, presented by Nick Robinson. London: BBC, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/226052013.pdf, accessed 28 May 2013.
- McGreal, C. (2012) MEK decision: Multimillion dollar campaign led to removal from terrorist list, The Guardian, http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/sep/21/iran-mek-group-removed-us-terrorism-list, accessed 21 September 2012.
- McSherry, B. (2004) Terrorism offences in the criminal code: Broadening the boundaries of Australian criminal laws. University of New South Wales Law Journal 27 (2): 354.Google Scholar
- Muller, M. (2008) Terrorism, proscription and the right to resist in the age of conflict. Denning Law Journal 20 (1): 111–131.Google Scholar
- Neal, A.W. (2010) Exceptionalism and the Politics of Counter-Terrorism: Liberty, Security and the War on Terror. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- NSW Supreme Court. (2007) R v Ul-Haque NSWSC 1251. New South Wales: NSWSC.Google Scholar
- Richmond, O. and Franks, J. (2005) Human security and the war on terror. In: F. Dodds and T. Pippard (eds.) Human and Environmental Security: An Agenda for Change. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.Google Scholar
- Robertson, C.G. (ed.) (1904) Select Statutes, Cases, and Documents to Illustrate English Constitutional History, 1660−1832: With a Supplement from 1832−1894. London: Methuen & Company.Google Scholar
- Sentas, V. (2010) Terrorist organisation offences and the LTTE: R v Vinayagamoorthy. Current Issues in Criminal Justice 22 (1): 159–169.Google Scholar
- Spencer, A. (2006) Questioning the concept of ‘new terrorism’. Peace, Conflict and Development 8: 1–33.Google Scholar
- Terrorism Act. (2000) London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Terrorism Act. (2006) London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
- Tham, J.-C. (2004) Possible constitutional objections to the powers to ban terrorist organisations. University of New South Wales Law Journal 27 (2): 482.Google Scholar
- US Department of State. (2012) Country reports on terrorism, http://www.state.gov/j/ct/rls/crt/2012/209989.htm, accessed 3 June 2013.
- Van de Kerckhove, G. (2009) Speech given to the conference ‘Terrorism lists, executive powers and human rights’. Université Libre de Bruxelles, 20th October.Google Scholar