British Politics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 314–340 | Cite as

Prime Minister's questions as political ritual

  • Joni Lovenduski
Original Article


This article contends that Prime Minister's Questions (PMQs) are a political ritual that supports a gender regime in the House of Commons. After a brief description of PMQs their context and nature are discussed from the standpoints of participants and observers. Then new evidence of the attitudes of MPs and the public is presented in which differences between women and men are analysed and discussed. These findings challenge the notion that PMQs are off-putting to the public, especially women, but show that many MPs are ambivalent, women more than men. The conclusions discuss these unexpected findings and assess their significance to the political representation of women and the nature of parliamentary politics.


Prime Minister's questions women gender parliament political ritual gender regime 



This article was prepared with the support of the Gendered Ceremony and Ritual Programme (GCRP), financed by the Leverhulme Foundation. It draws on interviews conducted for the programme by Faith Armitage and Rosa Malley in the course of their research. Both kindly included questions about PMQs in their interviews at the request of the author. It also makes use of earlier interviews conducted by Sarah Childs with the New Labour women MPs who were first elected to the House of Commons in 1997 and kindly supplied to the author. Each interview is therefore ascribed to the interviewer by their initials. The article also includes evidence from specially commissioned Survey Questions from YouGov and ComRes. Phillip Cowley helped with the You Gov Question design. Laurence Janta-Lipinski at YouGov and Katherine Peacock at ComRes made helpful suggestions about survey design and question wording. I am also grateful to Faith Armitage, Rosie Campbell, Sarah Childs, Alan Finlayson, Rosa Malley, Deborah Mabbett, Shirin Rai, Alan Ware and the participants in the GCRP programme and the Birkbeck Gender and British Politics Seminar series for their helpful feedback on earlier versions of this article.


  1. Abdela, L. (1989) Women with X Appeal. Bristol, UK: Macdonald Optima.Google Scholar
  2. Abélès, M. (1988) Modern political ritual: Ethnography of an inauguration and a pilgrimage by President Mitterand. Current Anthropology 29 (3): 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armitage, F. (2009) Are parliament's ceremonies and rituals a problem for British democracy? Presented at PSA Annual Conference 2009, Manchester, 7–9 April.Google Scholar
  4. Armitage, F. and Malley, R. (2008) Gendered ceremony and ritual in parliament: Concepts and a catalogue of UK parliamentary ceremonies,, accessed 8 August 2012.
  5. BBC News. (2011) The Andrew Marr Show Transcript David Cameron Interview, 2 October,, accessed 8 August 2012.
  6. BBC Radio 4. (2011) Dominic Sandbrook. Mind Your PMQs, Broadcast, 24 October,, accessed 8 August 2012.
  7. Bird, K. (2005) Gendering parliamentary questions. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 7 (3): 353–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blair, T. (2011) A Journey, Kindle edition New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  9. Bull, P. and Wells, P. (2011) Adversarial discourse in Prime Minister's questions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 31 (1): 30–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Campbell, A. (2011) Prelude to Power 1994–1997, Kindle Edition. London: Arrow Books.Google Scholar
  11. Chester, D.N. and Bowring, N. (1962) Questions in Parliament. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  12. Childs, S. (2004) New Labour Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Dodson, D.L. (2006) The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunleavy, P., Jones, G.W., Burnham, J., Elgie, R. and Fysh, P. (1995) Leaders, politics and institutional change: The decline of prime ministerial accountability to the House of Commons, 1869–1990. In: R.A.W. Rhodes and P. Dunleavy (eds.) Prime Minister, Cabinet and the Core Executive. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Franklin, M. and Norton, P. (1993) Parliamentary Questions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fox, J. (1998) The Langhorne Sisters. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  17. Hawkesworth, M. (2003) Congressional enactments of race-gender: Toward a theory of raced-gendered institutions. American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hall, P. (1986) Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Harris, S. (2001) Being politically impolite: Extending politeness theory to adversarial political discourse. Discourse and Society 12(4): 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoggart, S. (2011) A Hotline to the people. TheGuardian, 24 October,
  21. John, P and Bevan, S. (2011) Project report on Prime Minister's parliamentary questions,, accessed 8 August 2012.
  22. Jones, G.W. (1973) The Prime Minister and parliamentary questions. Parliamentary Affairs 26 (March): 260–273.Google Scholar
  23. Kathlene, L. (1995) Position power versus gender power: Who holds the floor? In: G. Duerst-Lahti and R.M. Kelly (eds.) Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 167–194.Google Scholar
  24. Krook, M.L. and Mackay, F. (2010) Gender, Politics and Institutions: Towards a Feminist Institutionalism. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Lahti, G.D. and Kelly, R.M. (1995) Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor Michigan: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lovenduski, J. (2005) Feminizing Politics. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  27. Lukes, S. (1975) Political ritual and social integration. Sociology 9(2): 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malley, R. (2012) The institutionalisation of gendered norms and the substantive representation of women in Westminster and the Scottish Parliament. PhD thesis, Bristol University.Google Scholar
  29. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Martin, S. (2011) Parliamentary questions, the behaviour of legislators, and the function of legislatures: An introduction. Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mullin, C. (2009) A View from the Foothills. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
  32. Puwar, N. (2004) Space Invaders: Race, Gender and Bodies Out of Place. London: Berg.Google Scholar
  33. Rai, S. (2010) Analysing ceremony and ritual in parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 16 (3): 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rogers, R. and Walters, R. (2006) How Parliament Works. Edinburgh: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  35. Rush, M. and Giddings, P. (2011) Parliamentary Socialisation: Learning the Ropes or Determining Behaviour. Houndmills, Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saalfield, T. (2011) Parliamentary questions as instruments of substantive representation: Visible minorities in the UK House of Commons, 2005–10. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3): 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sones, B., Moran, M. and Lovenduski, J. (2005) Women in Parliament. London: Politicos.Google Scholar
  38. Waylen, G. (2010) Researching ritual and the symbolic in parliaments: An institutionalist perspective. The Journal of Legislative Studies. 16 (3): 352–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Widdecombe, A. (2007) Feminizing politics: A review. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 4 (4): 749–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wright, T. (2003) British Politics: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joni Lovenduski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsBirkbeck CollegeUK

Personalised recommendations