Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New Labour in government: Think-tanks and social policy reform, 1997–2001

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article seeks to cast light on the role of think-tanks in policy making during the New Labour era. It assesses the extent to which the Labour government under Tony Blair, in its first term in office, made use of policy expertise from think-tanks to shape its social policy agenda. This policy field is appropriate for scrutiny because of its centrality in relation to New Labour's core values and policy agenda. Moreover, Blair's term in office during this period has been referred to as ‘government by think-tanks’, leading a number of political scientists to ask whether think-tanks as private, government-external institutions actually ‘make a difference’. The article is based on interviews with analysts from think-tanks, civil servants and politicians, as well as analysis of key documents. The article concludes that Labour, once in government, made little use of those think-tanks, which had supported the party modernisers in opposition. With the party in government, the civil service emerged as the most important actor in the design of social policy. A further important finding is that think-tank involvement – or the lack of it – in the policy process offers insights into broader changes in the British state.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For example from IPPR, Dan Corry went on to become member of the Council of Economic Advisors at the Treasury, research director Carey Oppenheim became advisor at No. 10 and Anna Coote became special advisor to Harriet Harman at the DSS. Paul Gregg, although remaining at CEP, became advisor at the Council for Economic Advisors. Richard Layard became part-time advisor at DfEE. From Demos, Tom Bentley went to DfEE as part-time advisor to David Blunkett, Benn Jupp went to DSS to work part time on the government's pensions review and Mark Leonard sat on the ‘Panel 2000’ charged with re-making the UK's image abroad.

References

  • Baldwin, T. (2001a) Blair faces party revolt on public service reforms. The Times 1 June 2001: 10.

  • Baldwin, T. (2001b) Think-tank wants to give blair more bite. The Times 14 March 2001: 2.

  • Ball, S.J. and Exley, S. (2010) Making policy with ‘good ideas’: Policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of new labour. Journal of Education Policy 25 (2): 151–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2006) The IPPR and demos: Think tanks of the new social democracy. The Political Quarterly 77 (2): 166–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T. and Oakley, K. (1999) The Real Deal: What Young People Really Think About Government, Politics and Social Exclusion. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1997) The Independent 8 December.

  • Blair, T. (1998a) The Third Way: New Politics for the New Century. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (1998b) Foreword. New Ambitions for Our Country. A New Contract for Welfare. Green Paper CM 8305 London: Stationary Office.

  • Blair, T. (1999) Beveridge revisited: A welfare state for the 21st century. In: R. Walker (ed.) Ending Child Poverty. Popular Welfare for the 21st Century. Bristol, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2000) Written answers to questions. 4 July 2000, Column 101W, Hansard Commons.

  • Blair, T. (2006) Cross-dressing on political policy is here to stay, says PM. Era of rivalry between left and right ‘is over’. The Guardian, 31 July 2006.

  • Blank, R.C. (2003) From Thatcher to the Third Way. Think-Tanks, Intellectuals and the Blair Project. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, M. (2007) Welfare Reform in the UK: 1997–2007. IFS Working Papers.

  • Brown, G. (1997) Hansard. House of Commons debate. 10 July 1997.

  • Brown, G. (2000) Speech at the new deal conference at 10 Downing Street. 30 November 2000, http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/newsroom_and_speeches/press/2000/press_140_00.cfm, accessed 4 May 2007.

  • Burkitt, N. (ed.) (2001) A Life's Work: Achieving Full and Fulfilling Employment. London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham, J. and Pyper, R. (2008) Britain's Modernised Civil Service. Contemporary Political Studies. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, J. (1987) Would Workfare Work? Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, A. (2000) The third way project in Britain. The role of the Prime Minister's policy unit. Politics 20 (3): 153–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office. (1999) Modernising Government. London: Stationary Office.

  • Cabinet Office. (2007) Code of conduct for special advisers. Last updated 6 February 2007, http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/propriety_and_ethics/special_advisers/code/index.asp, accessed 27 April 2007.

  • CASE. Personal interview by the author with an anonymous interviewee 1, 2007.

  • CASE. Personal interview by the author with an anonymous interviewee 2, 2007.

  • CASE. (1998) ESRC Research Centre for the Analysis of Social Exclusion. Annual Report 1997/1998, http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cr/CASEreport2.pdf, accessed 30 April 2007.

  • CASE. (1999) Persistent Poverty and Lifetime Inequality: The Evidence. Proceedings from a workshop held at HM Treasury. Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, LSE 17/18 November, http://sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/cr/casereport5.pdf, accessed 4 June 2007.

  • Cebulla, A. (2005) Welfare-to-Work. New Labour and the US Experience. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEP. Personal interview by the author with an anonymous interviewee 1, 2007.

  • CEP. (2003) Centre for economic performance. Annual review 2003/2004, http://cep.lse.ac.uk/about/overview/cep_programme.pdf, accessed 4 April 2007.

  • Charity Commission. (2008) Charity Commission Publishes Smith Institute Inquiry Report, http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/news/smithrc.asp, accessed 18 July 2008.

  • Cockett, R. (1995) Thinking the Unthinkable. Think-Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution 1931–1983. London: Fontana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSJ. (1994) Commission on Social Justice. Social Justice. Strategies for National Renewal. London: Vintage.

  • Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (1996) The nature and impact of think-tanks in contemporary Britain. In: M.D. Kandiah and A. Seldon (eds.) Ideas and Think-Tanks in Contemporary Britain. London: Frank Cass, Vol. 1. pp. 43–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (1998) British Think-Tanks and the Climate of Opinion. London: UCL Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (2004) A ‘hollowed-out’ tradition? British think-tanks in the 21st century. In: D. Stone and A. Denham (eds.) Think-Tank Traditions. Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester University Press, pp. 232–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A. and Garnett, M. (2006) What works? British think-tanks and the end of ideology. The Political Quarterly 77 (2): 156–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desai, R. (1994) Second hand dealers in ideas: Think-tanks and thatcherite hegemony. New Left Review, No. 203, No. January/February: 27–64.

  • Department for Education and Employment (DfEE). (1998) Department for Education and Employment. Design of the New Deal for 18–24 year olds, NDD1 PP3/33351/398/24. London: Stationary Office.

  • DSS Green Paper. (1998) Department for Social Security. New Ambitions for Our Country. A New Contract for Welfare. Department for Social Security Cm 3805 London HMSO. London: Stationary Office.

  • Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). (2005) Department for work and pensions. Five year strategy – opportunity and security throughout life, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/publications/dwp/2005/5_yr_strat/, accessed 19 October 2007.

  • DWP. (2008) No one written off: Reforming welfare to reward responsibility. Consultation Paper, http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/noonewrittenoff-complete.pdf, accessed 16 August 2009.

  • Evans, M. (2004) Understanding policy transfer. In: M. Evans (ed.) Policy Transfer in Global Perspective. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, pp. 10–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M. and Davies, J. (1999) Understanding policy transfer: A multi-level, multi-disciplinary perspective. Public Administration 77 (2): 361–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, S. (2003) The Labour Party. Continuity and Change in the Making of New Labour. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. (1997) Frozen asset. Financial Times 11 September.

  • Gardner, K. (1997) Bridges from benefit to work: A review. Social Policy Research. 13 September 1997, http://www.jrf.org.uk/sites/files/jrf/sp130.pdf, accessed 5 August 2009.

  • Geddes, M. (2000) Tackling social exclusion in the European Union? The limits of the new orthodoxy of local partnership. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24 (2): 782–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway, J., Salter, B. and Hart, S. (2007) How policy networks can damage democratic health. A case study in the government of governance. Public Administration 85 (3): 717–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, P. (2008) Realising Potential: A Vision for Personalised Conditionality and Support. An Independent Report to the Department for Work and Pensions. London: Stationery Office Limited.

  • The Guardian. (2001) Think the unsayable: Researchers can get too close to power. The Guardian 26 June: 15.

  • Hall, P. (1993) Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy making in Britain. Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1988) Foreword. The Hard Road to Renewal. London: Verso, p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, I. (2003) Interview quoted. In: R. Blank (ed.) From Thatcher to the Third Way. Think-Tanks, Intellectuals and the Blair Project. Stuttgart, Germany: Ibidem, p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, J. (1996) University for Industry. Creating a National Learning Network. London: IPPR.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPPR. Personal interview by the author with an anonymous interviewee 1, 2007.

  • IPPR. (2001) Set target for full employment – IPPR tells minister. Press release from 22 April 2001, http://www.ippr.org/pressreleases/archive.asp?id=549&fID=58, accessed 19 October 2007.

  • Jessop, B. (1994) The transition to post-fordism and the Schumpeterian workfare state. In: R. Burrows and B. Loader (eds.) Towards a Post-Fordist Welfare State? London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, M. and West, A. (1998) Employability and the new deals. New Economy 5 (3): 174–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R. (1998) Will the new deal work? Financial Times 8 January: 20.

  • Layard, R. (1999) Tackling Inequality. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lister, R. (1998) Fighting social exclusion …. with one hand tied behind our back. New Economy 5 (1): 14–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madoka, N. (2005) Introduction. In: S. Kenkyu (ed.) The World Directory of Think-Tanks, 4th edn. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, pp. VIII–XX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelson, P. (1995) BBC newsnight 9 November.

  • Marsh, D., David, R. and Smith, M. (2003) Unequal plurality: Towards an asymmetric power model of British politics. Government and Opposition 38 (3): 306–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGann, J. (2007) The global go-to think tanks. The Leading Public Policy Research Organizations in the World, http://www.fpri.org/research/thinktanks/mcgann.globalgotothinktanks.pdf, accessed 12 February 2011.

  • Morgan, J. (1998) Making jobs more secure. New Economy 5 (1): 44–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2005) Honest politics. BBC Radio 4. Broadcast 9 November 05.

  • Mulgan, G. (2006) Thinking in tanks: The changing ecology of political ideas. Political Quarterly 77 (20): 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G., Perri, 6. and Collins, K. (1997) The British Spring. A Manifesto for the Election After the Next. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Deal Taskforce. (1998) Meeting the needs of disadvantaged young people. November 1998.

  • OECD. (1994) The OECD Jobs Study. Facts, Analysis, Strategies, Vol. 1. Paris, France: OECD.

  • Panebianco, A. (1988) Political Parties: Organisation and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pautz, H. (2007) Scottish think-tanks and policy networks. Scottish Affairs 58 (Winter): 57–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pautz, H. (2008) Think-tanks and public policy in the UK and Germany. Unpublished PhD thesis, Glasgow Caledonian University.

  • Pautz, H. (forthcoming) The think-tank revisited. Public Policy and Administration.

  • Pautz, H. (2010) Think tanks in the United Kingdom and Germany: Actors in the modernisation of social democracy. British Journal of Politics & International Relations 12 (2): 274–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, A. (1997) Labour's benefits revolt. Cuts outcry humiliates Harman. The Guardian 11 December.

  • Perri 6. (1997a) Escaping Poverty: From Safety Nets to Networks of Opportunity. London: Demos.

  • Peters, B.G. (1997) Shouldn’t row, can’t steer. What's a government to do? Public Policy and Administration 12 (2): 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, A., Shaoul, J., Rowland, D. and Player, S. (2001) Public services and the private sector: A response to the IPPR. Catalyst Trust, http://www.yescombe.myby.co.uk/bibliogframe.htm, accessed 5 October 2007.

  • Porter, A. (2000) Ace think-tank commander. Sunday Business 31 December: 1.

  • Porter, A. (2001) A think-tank that moved at high speed. SundayBusiness 14 October: 1.

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (1997) Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (2001) The civil service. In: A. Seldon (ed.) The Blair Effect. London: Little Brown, pp. 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R.A.W. (2007) Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies 28 (8): 1243–1264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, F. and Doig, A. (1986) Conviction politics in the public service. Public Money September 1986.

  • Robinson, P. (2001) Choosing Justice: The IPPR Report. Conclusion to the Report. TheObserver 12 August.

  • Scharpf, F. (1994) Games real actors could play. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6: 27–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldon, M. (2001) Interests at the heart of new labour: Business is driving government plans for schools and hospitals. The Guardian, 17 August; 18.

  • Senior, A. (2001) Stakeholder pensions are a failure, says think-tank. The Times 9 August: 24.

  • Singer, O. (1993) Knowledge and politics in economic policy-making. Official economic advisors in the USA, Great Britain and Germany. In: G. Peters and A. Barker (eds.) Advising West European Governments. Inquiries, Expertise and Public Policy. Edinburgh University Press, pp. 72–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelcher, C. (2000) Changing images of the state: Overloaded, hollowed-out, congested. Public Policy and Administration 15 (3): 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. (2000) Think-tank transnationalisation and non-profit analysis, advice and advocacy. Global Society 13: 154–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmins, N. (1999) Think-tank's new broom sweeps clean. Financial Times, 14 January: 11.

  • Waugh, P. (2000) Think-tank supports livingstone over tube. The Independent, 20 April: 9.

  • Weaver, K.R. (1989) The changing world of think-tanks. PS: Political Science and Politics 22 (3): 563–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yee, A.S. (1996) The causal effects of ideas on policies. International Organization 50 (1): 69–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economic Studies and International Business, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, G4 0BA, UK

    Hartwig Pautz

Authors
  1. Hartwig Pautz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pautz, H. New Labour in government: Think-tanks and social policy reform, 1997–2001. Br Polit 6, 187–209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2011.9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2011.9

Keywords

Search

Navigation