Skip to main content
Log in

The analytical and political limits to ‘interpreting’ governance

  • Symposium
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bevir, M. (2005) New Labour: A Critique. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevir, M. (2010) Democratic Governance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1994) Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2000) The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, W. (2005) After New Labour: Social Theory and Centre-left Politics. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leggett, W. (2010) What makes progressive ideology? Lessons from the third way. In: K. Hickson and S. Griffiths (eds.) British Party Politics and Ideology after New Labour. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2001) Community, citizenship and the third way. In: D. Meredyth and J. Minson (eds.) Citizenship and Cultural Policy. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leggett, W. The analytical and political limits to ‘interpreting’ governance. Br Polit 6, 241–251 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2011.12

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2011.12

Navigation