This article discusses the utility and fecundity promised for British political studies by the study of speech and rhetoric. It is argued that the systematic investigation of speech in British politics can shed light on political institutions, ideologies and strategies. After exploring these areas in some detail the article goes on to discuss the last party conference speech Tony Blair delivered as Prime Minister. This discussion is demonstrative and synoptic in nature, surveying a broad territory and showing the kinds of questions that a rhetorical political analysis can ask and what, in response, might be done to answer these questions.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
These figures are derived from the archive provided by the Downing Street website. The completeness of this archive has not been verified (see http://www.number10.gov.uk/output/Page12116.asp).
On the paradoxical relation of appearance to reality in politics and the implications of this for political science, see Connolly (1981).
This was in response to news reports that Blair's wife had made disparaging remarks about Gordon Brown during the latter's speech.
In previous conference speeches Blair has referred to the internet generation and the popular culture generation (see Finlayson, 2003, chapter 2).
The day before Blair's speech his likely successor Gordon Brown had delivered a speech perceived as laying out his own plans for his leadership, evoking public duty rather than celebrity. Peter Mandelson had given interviews blaming Brown for causing the ‘fissure’ at the heart of New Labour and John Reid, the Home secretary, suggested Blair was wrong to have announced his departure (see Branigan, 2006b).
Andrew, H. (2004) New Labour at the Centre: Constructing Political Space, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bang, H. (ed.) (2003) Governance as Social and Political Communication, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Beard, A. (1999) The Language of Politics, London: Routledge.
Bevir, M., Dowding, K., Finlayson, A., Hay, C. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2004) ‘Interpretive methodology and political science: a roundtable’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 6 (2): 129–164.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2003) Interpreting British Governance, London: Routledge.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2007) Governance Stories, London: Routledge.
Bevir, M. and Rhodes, R.A.W. (2008) ‘Authors’ response: politics as cultural practice’, Political Studies Review 6 (2): 170–177.
Blyth, M. (2002) ‘Institutions and Ideas’, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 292–310.
Branigan, T. (2006a) ‘Two in five voters want Blair to quit now’, The Guardian, 9 September.
Branigan, T. (2006b) ‘Fissure at heart of New Labour, says Mandelson’, The Guardian, 26 September.
Bull, P. (1994) ‘On identifying questions, replies and non-replies in political interviews’, Journal of Language and Social Psychology 13 (2): 115–131.
Chilton, P. (2003) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice, London: Routledge.
Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Connolly, W. (1981) Appearance and Reality in Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Connolly, W. (1993) The Terms of Political Discourse, Prineton: Princeton University Press.
DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (eds.) (1991) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Edelman, M.J. (1985) The Symbolic Uses of Politics, Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Fairclough, N. (2001) Language and Power, Harlow: Longman.
Faucher-King, F. (2005) Changing Parties: An Anthropology of British Political Party Conferences, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Finlayson, A. (2003) Making Sense of New Labour, London: Lawrence and Wishart.
Finlayson, A. (2007) ‘From beliefs to arguments: interpretive methodology and rhetorical political analysis’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (4): 545–563.
Freeden, M. (1998) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Glynos, J. and Howarth, D. (2008) ‘Structure, agency and power in political analysis: beyond contextualised self-interpretations’, Political Studies Review 6 (2): 155–169.
Hacking, I. (1991) ‘The making and molding of child abuse’, Critical Inquiry 17 (2): 253–288.
Hall, P.A. and Taylor, R.C.R. (1996) ‘Political science and the three new institutionalisms’, Political Studies 44 (5): 936–957.
Hall, S. (1988) The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left, London: Verso.
Hay, C. and Wincott, D. (1998) ‘Structure, agency and historical institutionalism’, Political Studies 46 (5): 951–957.
Heffernan, R. (2001) New Labour and Thatcherism: Political Change in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hindmoor, A. (2004) New Labour at the Centre: Constructing Political Space, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jamieson, K.H. (1990) Eloquence in an Electronic Age: The Transformation of Political Speechmaking, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jamieson, K.H. and Campbell, K. (1990) Deeds Done in Words: Presidential Rhetoric and the Genres of Governance, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levitas, R. (2005) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour, 2nd revised edn, Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Lowndes, V. (2002) ‘Institutionalism’, in D. Marsh and G. Stoker (eds.) Theory and Methods in Political Science, Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 90–108.
March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. (1984) ‘The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life’, American Political Science Review 78: 734–749.
McLean, I. (2001) Rational Choice and British Politics: An Analysis of Rhetoric and Manipulation from Peel to Blair, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLean, I. (2002) ‘William H. Riker and the invention of heresthetic(s)’, British Journal of Political Science 32: 535–558.
Medhurst, M.J. (1994) Eisenhower's War of Words: Rhetoric and Leadership, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University Press.
Medhurst, M.J. (2006) The Rhetorical Presidency of George H. W. Bush, College Station, TX: Texas A&M University Press.
Myers, F. (2000) ‘Harold Macmillan's ‘Winds of Change’ speech: a case study in the rhetoric of policy change’, Rhetoric & Public Affairs 3 (4): 555–575.
Riker, W.H. (1986) The Art of Political Manipulation, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Schon, D.A. (1979) ‘Generative Metaphor: A Perspective on Problem-Setting in Social Policy’, in A. Ortony (ed.) Metaphor and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254–283.
Shepsle, K.A. (2003) ‘Losers in politics (and how they sometimes become winners): William Riker's heresthetic’, Perspectives on Politics 1 (2): 307–315.
Skinner, Q. (2002) Visions of Politics: Volume 1 Regarding Method, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Smith, M.J. (2008) ‘Recentering British government: beliefs, traditions and dilemmas in political science’, Political Studies Review 6 (2): 143–154.
Toynbee, P. (2006) ‘Charm and eloquence. But a missed chance’, The Guardian, 27 September.
Tulis, J.K. (1988) The Rhetorical Presidency, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Weingast, B.A. (1998) ‘Political Institutions: Rational Choice Perspectives’, in R.E. Goodin and H.-D. Klingemann (eds.) A New Handbook of Political Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wintour, P. (2006) ‘Going, going, not quite gone’, The Guardian, 27 September.
Zarefsky, D. (1986) President Johnson's War on Poverty, Tuskaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Zarefsky, D. (1993) Lincoln, Douglas, and Slavery: In the Crucible of Public Debate, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology, London and New York: Verso.
We acknowledge the benefit we derived from early conversations about Blair's 2006 speech with Emilia Palonen.
About this article
Cite this article
Finlayson, A., Martin, J. ‘It Ain’t What You Say…’: British Political Studies and the Analysis of Speech and Rhetoric. Br Polit 3, 445–464 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/bp.2008.21
- political speech
- interpretive methodologies
- British politics
- Tony Blair