University branding: Understanding students’ choice of an educational institution
This article presents an exploratory study using survey data collected at two universities in the United States to compare the criteria that public and private university students use when selecting the colleges/universities to which they applied. The importance of university selection criteria differs between those who attend public and private institutions. Private university students appear to evaluate reputation, selectivity, personal interaction, facilities and cost, whereas public university students evaluate programs, athletics, reputation, cost, housing and location, although the findings lend support for different interpretations of common factors. Whereas reputation for students at public institutions was limited to perceptions of a quality education and accreditation, students at private institutions viewed reputation as including name recognition, reputation of the university and reputation of the faculty. These findings suggest that although university branding initiatives need to be customized by type of institution, both student types now seek a modern university experience that includes the latest technology, community involvement and an attractive campus environment.
Keywordsbranding university name awareness university selection
- Bowers, T.A. and Pugh, R.C. (1973) Factors underlying college choice by students and parents. Journal of College Student Personnel 13 (3): 220–224.Google Scholar
- Dumain, E. (2006) Oberlin gets new ‘Fearless’ branding. The Oberlin Review 134 (25): 6–17.Google Scholar
- Finder, A. (2005) To woo students, colleges choose names that sell. New York Times 11 August: A. 1.Google Scholar
- Kurz, K., Scannell, J. and Veeder, S. (2008) Willingness to pay: Making the best case for institutional value and return on investment. University Business 11 (5): 31–32.Google Scholar
- Levy, D. (1992) Private institutions of higher education. In: B. Clark and G. Neave (eds.) The Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press, pp. 1183–1194.Google Scholar
- Lewin, T. (2006) At colleges, women are leaving men in the dust, the new gender divide: Boys who coast. New York Times 9 July: 1.1.Google Scholar
- LipmanHearne. (2011) Real ROI: How UC claimed its rightful place in the public's heart, http://www.lipmanhearne.com/Libraries/Case_Study_Documents/LipmanHearne_CaseStudy-UniversityofCincinnati.pdf, accessed 24 December 2011.
- Lockwood, R.C. and Hadd, J. (2007) Building a brand in higher education; why business practices – Particularly brand strategies – are becoming essential in today's universities. Gallup Management Journal Online 12(July): 1–6.Google Scholar
- Lombardi, J.V. (2006) Public and private: What's the difference? Inside Higher Ed, (6 March), http://www.insidehighered.com/views/2006/03/06/lombardi, accessed 24 December 2011.
- Louisiana State University. (2006) LSU welcomes you to the now: LSU to launch a new national image and recruiting campaign. LSU's Biweekly Newsletter for Faculty & Staff, http://www.lsu.edu/lsutoday/060113/pageone.html., accessed 18 July 2008.
- Marginson, S. (2004) Global public space and global marketplace. Rethinking the public/private divide in higher education. Keynote paper for the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE) conference; 14–16 December, Bristol, http://www.education.monash.edu.au/centres/mcrie/docs/conferencekeynotes/srhe-keynote-161204.doc, accessed 23 December 2011.
- Moore, R.M. (2010) The Real U: Building Brands That Resonate with Students, Faculty, Staff and Donors. Washington DC: Council for Advancement and Support of Education (CASE).Google Scholar
- Paden, N. and Stell, R. (2006) Branding options for distance learning programs: Managing the effect on university image. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 3 (8): 45–54.Google Scholar
- Sevier, R.A. (2007a) Advancing the brand. University Business 10 (2): 46–51.Google Scholar
- Sevier, R.A. (2007b) Brand as experience, experience as brand. University Business 10 (7): 27–28.Google Scholar
- Sevier, R.A. (2007c) Delivering on your brand experience. University Business 10 (12): 34–36.Google Scholar
- Shampeny, R. (24 October 2003) Colleges turn attention to branding in competition for new students. The Business Review (Albany), http://bizjournals.com/albany/stories/2003/10/27/focus5.html?t=printable, accessed 5 June 2008.
- Stamp, R. (2005) How deep is your brand? AUA Newslink June: 46.Google Scholar
- Tam, J. (9 May 2006) ‘Fear the Turtle’ campaign impacts student enrollment. Diamondback Online, http://media.www.diamondbackonline.com/media/ storage/paper873/news/2006/05/09/NewsonCampus/fear-The. Turtle.Campaign.Impacts.Student.Enrollment-2325525.shtml, accessed 16 July 2008.Google Scholar
- Temple, P. (2006) Branding higher education: Illusion or reality? Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education 10 (1): 15–19.Google Scholar
- Twitchell, J.B. (2004) Higher Ed, Inc. Wilson Quarterly 28 (3): 46–59.Google Scholar
- University of Maryland. (2008) Fear the turtle, http://www.feartheturtle.umd.edu/, accessed 15 July 2011.
- University of Rhode Island. (2006) Branding initiative, http://www.uri.edu/uribrand/, accessed 13 July 2008.
- University of Rhode Island. (2011) University branding, http://www.uri.edu/uribrand/, accessed 24 December 2011.
- University of Tennessee. (2008) Changing tomorrow, today, http://future.tennessee.edu/book/index.shtml, accessed 18 July 2008.
- Vaughn, R., Pitlik, J. and Hansotia, B. (1978) Understanding university choice: A multi-attribute approach. In: K. Hunt (ed.) Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 5 Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research, pp. 26–31.Google Scholar
- Winston, G.C. (2002) When it's wrong to grow. Trusteeship 10 (1): 29–32.Google Scholar