Skip to main content
Log in

Chinese biotech versus international ethics? Accounting for the China–America CRISPR ethical divide

  • Commentary
  • Published:
BioSocieties Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.


  • Baltimore, D. et al (2015) A prudent path forward for genomic engineering and germline gene modification. Science 348 (6230): 36–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. (1999) Shengwu jishu qiancheng wuliang [The unlimited prospects of biotechnology]. Zhishi jingji [Knowledge Economy] (6): 22–26.

  • Cheng, L. (2006) Ethics: China already has clear stem-cell guidelines. Nature 440 (7087): 992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Science, Technology, and Law at the National Academies (2015) NAS and NAM initiative on human gene editing. 24 June,, accessed 29 June 2015.

  • Economist (2015) To the crack of doom. 2 May,, accessed 28 June 2015.

  • Hu, M. (2015) Gai de liao jiyin rao bu guo lunli zhongguo kexuejia xiugai renlei peitai jiyin re zhengyi [Genes are editable, ethics cannot be bypassed: Genetic editing in human embryos by Chinese scientists incurred controversy]. China Science Daily 6 June: 4.

  • Liang, P. et al (2015) CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein & Cell 6 (5): 363–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, L. (2015) IVF the Chinese way: Zhang Lizhu and post-mao human in vitro fertilization research. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 9 (1): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regalado, A. (2015) Engineering the perfect baby. MIT Technology Review 5 March.

  • Sarewitz, D. (2015) CRISPR: Science can’t solve it. Nature 522 (7557): 413–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, L. (2003) Biology and Revolution in Twentieth-Century China. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, J. (2001) Mao’s War Against Nature: Politics and the Environment in Revolutionary China. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, R. (2015) Critics lash out at Chinese scientists who edited DNA in human embryos. NPR, 23 April,, accessed 28 June 2015.

  • Sun, X. (2015) Zhongguo kexuejia xiugai renlei peitai jiyin yin zhengyi [Human embryonic genome editing by Chinese scientists raised controversy]. 23 April,, accessed 27 April 2015.

  • Tatlow, D.K. (2015) A scientific ethical divide between China and West. New York Times 29 June: D3.

  • UK Government (2015) The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Mitochondrial Donation) Regulations 2015 (coming into force on 29 October 2015). The National Archives,, accessed 16 June 2015.

  • Wahlberg, A. et al (2013) From global bioethics to ethical governance of biomedical research. Social Science & Medicine 98: 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. (2015) Xiugai renlei peitai jiyin yanjiu re zhengyi: dang kexue yu lunli zhuang zai yiqi [Human embryonic genome editing raised controversy: When science clashes with ethics]. China Science Daily 29 April: 1.

  • Zeng, Y. and Xie, T. (2015) Shougai renlei peitai jiyin 80hou tiancai chuzi Jiangmen [The genius of 80s generation who first edited genome in human embryos comes from Jiangmen]. South Metropolitan Daily 29 April: JB04.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, L., Stevens, H. Chinese biotech versus international ethics? Accounting for the China–America CRISPR ethical divide. BioSocieties 10, 483–488 (2015).

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: