Skip to main content

Ethics of neuroenhancement: A phantom debate

BioSocieties volume 5, pages 153–156 (2010)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

£ 29.95

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

References

  • Arnsten, A.F. and Li, B.M. (2005) Neurobiology of executive functions: Catecholamine influences on prefrontal cortical functions. Biological Psychiatry 57 (11): 1377–1384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berridge, K.C. (2007) The debate over dopamine's role in reward: The case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 191 (3): 391–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clatworthy, P.L. et al. (2009) Dopamine release in dissociable striatal subregions predicts the different effects of oral methylphenidate on reversal learning and spatial working memory. Journal of Neuroscience 29 (15): 4690–4696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DAK. (2009) Gesundheitsreport 2009: Analyse der Arbeitsunfähigkeitsdaten. Schwerpunktthema Doping am Arbeitsplatz. Hamburg: DAK Forschung.

  • de Jongh, R., Bolt, I., Schermer, M. and Olivier, B. (2008) Botox for the brain: Enhancement of cognition, mood and pro-social behavior and blunting of unwanted memories. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 32 (4): 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L.D., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G. and Schulenberg, J.E. (2005) Monitoring the Future National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975–2004. Volume I and II: Secondary School Students and College Students and Adults Ages 19–45. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH Publication Nos. 05-5727 and 05-5728).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (1973) Attention and Effort. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapner, D.A. (2003) Recreational Use of Ritalin on College Campuses. Newton, MA: The Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapner, D.A. (2008) Recreational Use of Ritalin on College Campuses. Newton, MA: The Higher Education Center for Alcohol and Other Drug Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killgore, W.D., Rupp, T.L., Grugle, N.L., Reichardt, R.M., Lipizzi, E.L. and Balkin, T.J. (2008) Effects of dextroamphetamine, caffeine and modafinil on psychomotor vigilance test performance after 44h of continuous wakefulness. Journal of Sleep Research 17 (3): 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, R. (2008) Approved and investigational uses of modafinil: An evidence-based review. Drugs 68 (13): 1803–1839.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanni, C. et al. (2008) Cognition enhancers between treating and doping the mind. Pharmacological Research 57 (3): 196–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattay, V.S. et al. (2000) Effects of dextroamphetamine on cognitive performance and cortical activation. Neuroimage 12 (3): 268–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattay, V.S. et al (2003) Catechol O-methyltransferase val158-met genotype and individual variation in the brain response to amphetamine. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 100 (10): 6186–6191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, S.E., Knight, J.R., Teter, C.J. and Wechsler, H. (2005) Non-medical use of prescription stimulants among US college students: Prevalence and correlates from a national survey. Addiction 100 (1): 96–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, M.A., Owen, A.M., Sahakian, B.J., Mavaddat, N., Pickard, J.D. and Robbins, T.W. (2000) Methylphenidate enhances working memory by modulating discrete frontal and parietal lobe regions in the human brain. Journal of Neuroscience 20 (6): RC65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, U., Steffenhagen, N., Regenthal, R. and Bublak, P. (2004) Effects of modafinil on working memory processes in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177 (1–2): 161–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D.C., Shneerson, J.M. and File, S.E. (2005) Cognitive effects of modafinil in student volunteers may depend on IQ. Pharmacology Biochemistry & Behavior 82 (1): 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, N. (2008) America's first amphetamine epidemic 1929–1971: A quantitative and qualitative retrospective with implications for the present. American Journal of Public Health 98 (6): 974–985.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sussman, S., Pentz, M.A., Spruijt-Metz, D. and Miller, T. (2006) Misuse of ‘study drugs’: prevalence, consequences, and implications for policy. Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention and Policy 1: 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teter, C.J., McCabe, S.E., Cranford, J.A., Boyd, C.J. and Guthrie, S.K. (2005) Prevalence and motives for illicit use of prescription stimulants in an undergraduate student sample. Journal of American College Health 53 (6): 253–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesensten, N.J., Belenky, G., Kautz, M.A., Thorne, D.R., Reichardt, R.M. and Balkin, T.J. (2002) Maintaining alertness and performance during sleep deprivation: Modafinil versus caffeine. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 159 (3): 238–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Reviewed by, University Hospital of Psychiatry, University of Zürich, Switzerland

    Boris B Quednow

Authors
  1. Boris B Quednow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quednow, B. Ethics of neuroenhancement: A phantom debate. BioSocieties 5, 153–156 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2009.13

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2009.13