Indifference and alienation: Diverging dimensions of electoral dealignment in Europe

Abstract

Within the literature, there is an ongoing debate on how to understand the broader implications of the process of electoral dealignment. While some authors argue that dealignment leads to a more ‘open’ electorate that ponders the options offered by the party system, other authors have argued that dealignment leads to a general alienation from the party system. In this article, we investigate the relation between partisanship, indifference towards political parties, and alienation from the party system, on the basis of an analysis of the voter surveys of the European Election Studies project, 1989–2014. The results indicate not only that dealignment is associated with indifference as well as with alienation but also that the relation with alienation is much stronger, both on an aggregate and on an individual level. We conclude, therefore, that dealignment could pose a challenge for the legitimacy of the party system as a whole.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the 2009 and 2014 EES voter surveys, respondents’ propensity to vote for each of the parties was measured on a scale from 0 to 10 instead of 1 to 10. To allow a comparison with the earlier 1–10 scales, the 0–10 scales were recoded, with 0 being recoded to 1, the values 1 and 2 both being 2 and all other values held constant.

  2. 2.

    Alternatively, we also perform analyses with partisan strength as a measure of dealignment (1=no attachment, 2=merely a sympathizer, 3=fairly close, 4=very close). This analysis resulted in basically the same results (see Appendix C).

  3. 3.

    Theoretically, it could be expected that these effects are not the same in all of the cases that we investigate, but that they are dependent on characteristics of the election and the political system. In an additional analysis, we therefore also estimated random intercept models in which we included voter turnout, effective number of parties, and proportionality of the electoral system as characteristics of that specific election. None of these election-level variables was found to significantly affect indifference or alienation, however, and the individual-level estimates of this analysis showed no difference with the more parsimonious models reported in this article (results available from authors).

  4. 4.

    It is important to note that we also observe an increase in indifference and alienation when pooling the data. The general, European-wide, trend is thus one of growing levels of indifference and alienation.

  5. 5.

    To examine this question we analyse the impact of birth cohorts – operationalized as 5-year intervals on the basis of respondsents’ year of birth and the interactive effect of birth cohorts and partisanship.

References

  1. Aarts, K. and Wessels, B. (2005) Electoral turnout. In: J. Thomassen (ed.) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–83.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Adams, J., Dow, J. and Merrill, S. (2006) The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to presidential elections. Political Behavior 28(1): 65–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Albright, J.J. (2009) Does political knowledge erode party attachments?: A review of the cognitive mobilization thesis. Electoral Studies 28(2): 248–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, S.P. and Glomm, G. (1992) Alienation, indifference and the choice of ideological position. Social Choice and Welfare 9(1): 17–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bafumi, J. and Robert, Y.S. (2009) A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics 71(1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, H.D. and Stewart, M.C. (1998) The decline of parties in the minds of citizens. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Crewe, I., Särlvik, B. and Alt, J. (1977) Partisan dealignment in Britain 1964–1974. British Journal of Political Science 7(2): 129–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dalton, R.J. (1984) Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies. Journal of Politics 46(2): 264–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dalton, R.J. (2004) Democratic Choices, Democratic Challenges: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dalton, R.J. (2012) Apartisans and the changing German electorate. Electoral Studies 31(1): 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dalton, R.J. (2013) The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Washington DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P. (2002) Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dalton, R.J. and Welzel, C. (eds.) (2014) The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dassonneville, R. and Hooghe, M. (forthcoming) Economic indicators and electoral volatility: Economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013. Comparative European Politics, in press. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cep/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/cep20153a.html, doi: 10.1057/cep.2015.3.

  16. Dassonneville, R., Hooghe, M. and Vanhoutte, B. (2012) Age, period and cohort effects in the decline of party identification in Germany: An analysis of a two decade panel study in Germany (1992–2009). German Politics 21(2): 209–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Denver, D. and Garnett, M. (2014) British General Elections Since 1964: Diversity, Dealignment and Disillusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Evans, G. and Tilley, J. (2012) The depoliticization of inequality and redistribution: Explaining the decline of class voting. Journal of Politics 74(4): 963–976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ESS Round 1: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-1 2002 Documentation Report. Edition 6.4. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.

  20. ESS Round 2: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-2 2004 Documentation Report. Edition 3.5. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.

  21. ESS Round 3: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-3 2006 Documentation Report. Edition 3.5. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.

  22. ESS Round 4: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-4 2008 Documentation Report. Edition 5.3. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.

  23. ESS Round 5: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-5 2010 Documentation Report. Edition 3.2. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.

  24. ESS Round 6: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-6 2012 Documentation Report. Edition 2.1. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.

  25. Franklin, M., Mackie, T. and Valen, H. (2009) Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Franklin, M.N. (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hooghe, M. and Kern, A. (2015) Party membership and closeness and the development of trust in political institutions: An analysis of the European Social Survey, 2002–2010. Party Politics 21(6): 944–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jessee, S.A. (2010) Partisan bias, political information and spatial voting in the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Politics 72(2): 327–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnston, R., Matthews, J.S. and Bittner, A. (2007) Turnout and the party system in Canada, 1988–2004. Electoral Studies 26(4): 735–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kayser, M.A. and Wlezien, C. (2011) Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote. European Journal of Political Research 50(3): 365–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lisi, M. (2015) Partisanship and age effects in recent democracies: Southern Europe from a comparative perspective. Comparative European Politics 13(4): 493–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mair, P. (2002) In the aggregate: Mass electoral behaviour in Western Europe, 1950–2000. In: H. Keman (ed.) Comparative Democratic Politics. London: Sage, pp. 122–140.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Marthaler, S. (2008) The paradox of the politically-sophisticated partisan: The French case. West European Politics 31(5): 937–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mikhaylov, S. (2008) European Election Study (EES) Trend File (1989–2004), https://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_marsh/ees_trend_file.php.

  35. Pedersen, M. (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Science Research 7(1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Rose, R. and McAllister, I. (1986) Voters Begin to Choose. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Särlvik, B. and Crewe, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmitt, H. (1989) On party attachment in Western Europe and the utility of Eurobarometer data. West European Politics 12(2): 122–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Schmitt, H., Scholz, E., Leim, I. and Moschner, M. (2008) The Mannheim Eurobarometer Trend File 1970–2002 (ed. 2.00). European Commission [Principal investigator]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3521 Data file Version 2.0.1, doi:10.4232/1.10074.

  40. Schmitt, H. (2009) Partisanship in Nine Western Democracies. In: J. Bartle and P. Belluci (eds.) Political Parties and Partisanship. London: Routledge 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Schmitt, H., Popa, S. A., Hobolt, S. B. and Teperoglou, E. (2015) European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1. 12300.

  42. Söderlund, P. (2008) Retrospective voting and electoral volatility: A nordic perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 31(2): 217–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S.B. (2011) Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. Journal of Politics 73(2): 316–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. van Biezen, I., Mair, P. and Poguntke, T. (2012) Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. van der Eijk, C. and Marsh, M. (2011) Comparing non-ipsative measures of party support. Paper presented at the 1st European Conference on comparative electoral Research, 1–3 December, Sofia, Bulgaria.

  46. van Egmond, M., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S.B., Franklin, M.N. and Sapir, E. V (2013) European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.11760.

  47. Walczak, A., van der Brug, W. and de Vries, C.E. (2012) Long- and short-term determinants of party preferences: Inter-generational differences in Western and East central Europ. Electoral Studies 31(2): 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Zelle, C. (1995) Social dealignment versus political frustration: Contrasting explanations of the floating vote in Germany. European Journal of Political Research 27(3): 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Dassonneville.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table A1

Table A1 Evolution of indifference over time

Appendix B

Table A2

Table B1 Evolution of alienation over time

Appendix C

Table A3

Table C1 Explaining political trust and satisfaction with democracy by means of alienation and indifference

Appendix D

Table A4

Table D1 Explaining indifference – election by election

Appendix E

Table A5

Table E1 Explaining alienation – Election by election

Appendix F

Table A6

Table F1 Explaining indifference – Generational differences

Appendix G

Table A7

Table G1 Explaining alienation – Generational differences

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dassonneville, R., Hooghe, M. Indifference and alienation: Diverging dimensions of electoral dealignment in Europe. Acta Polit 53, 1–23 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2016.3

Download citation

Keywords

  • political parties
  • dealignment
  • partisanship
  • indifference
  • alienation