Indifference and alienation: Diverging dimensions of electoral dealignment in Europe

Original Article

Abstract

Within the literature, there is an ongoing debate on how to understand the broader implications of the process of electoral dealignment. While some authors argue that dealignment leads to a more ‘open’ electorate that ponders the options offered by the party system, other authors have argued that dealignment leads to a general alienation from the party system. In this article, we investigate the relation between partisanship, indifference towards political parties, and alienation from the party system, on the basis of an analysis of the voter surveys of the European Election Studies project, 1989–2014. The results indicate not only that dealignment is associated with indifference as well as with alienation but also that the relation with alienation is much stronger, both on an aggregate and on an individual level. We conclude, therefore, that dealignment could pose a challenge for the legitimacy of the party system as a whole.

Keywords

political parties dealignment partisanship indifference alienation 

References

  1. Aarts, K. and Wessels, B. (2005) Electoral turnout. In: J. Thomassen (ed.) The European Voter: A Comparative Study of Modern Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams, J., Dow, J. and Merrill, S. (2006) The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to presidential elections. Political Behavior 28 (1): 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Albright, J.J. (2009) Does political knowledge erode party attachments?: A review of the cognitive mobilization thesis. Electoral Studies 28 (2): 248–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, S.P. and Glomm, G. (1992) Alienation, indifference and the choice of ideological position. Social Choice and Welfare 9 (1): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bafumi, J. and Robert, Y.S. (2009) A new partisan voter. Journal of Politics 71 (1): 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A., Converse, P.E., Miller, W.E. and Stokes, D.E. (1960) The American Voter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clarke, H.D. and Stewart, M.C. (1998) The decline of parties in the minds of citizens. Annual Review of Political Science 1: 357–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crewe, I., Särlvik, B. and Alt, J. (1977) Partisan dealignment in Britain 1964–1974. British Journal of Political Science 7 (2): 129–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalton, R.J. (1984) Cognitive mobilization and partisan dealignment in advanced industrial democracies. Journal of Politics 46 (2): 264–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalton, R.J. (2004) Democratic Choices, Democratic Challenges: The Erosion of Political Support in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalton, R.J. (2012) Apartisans and the changing German electorate. Electoral Studies 31 (1): 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dalton, R.J. (2013) The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Washington DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
  13. Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P. (2002) Parties Without Partisans. Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dalton, R.J. and Welzel, C. (eds.) (2014) The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dassonneville, R. and Hooghe, M. (forthcoming) Economic indicators and electoral volatility: Economic effects on electoral volatility in Western Europe, 1950–2013. Comparative European Politics, in press. http://www.palgrave-journals.com/cep/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/cep20153a.html, doi: 10.1057/cep.2015.3.
  16. Dassonneville, R., Hooghe, M. and Vanhoutte, B. (2012) Age, period and cohort effects in the decline of party identification in Germany: An analysis of a two decade panel study in Germany (1992–2009). German Politics 21 (2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Denver, D. and Garnett, M. (2014) British General Elections Since 1964: Diversity, Dealignment and Disillusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Evans, G. and Tilley, J. (2012) The depoliticization of inequality and redistribution: Explaining the decline of class voting. Journal of Politics 74 (4): 963–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. ESS Round 1: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-1 2002 Documentation Report. Edition 6.4. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  20. ESS Round 2: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-2 2004 Documentation Report. Edition 3.5. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  21. ESS Round 3: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-3 2006 Documentation Report. Edition 3.5. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  22. ESS Round 4: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-4 2008 Documentation Report. Edition 5.3. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  23. ESS Round 5: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-5 2010 Documentation Report. Edition 3.2. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  24. ESS Round 6: European Social Survey (2014) ESS-6 2012 Documentation Report. Edition 2.1. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, Norwegian Social Science Data Services for ESS ERIC.Google Scholar
  25. Franklin, M., Mackie, T. and Valen, H. (2009) Electoral Change. Responses to Evolving Social and Attitudinal Structures in Western Countries. Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  26. Franklin, M.N. (2004) Voter Turnout and the Dynamics of Electoral Competition in Established Democracies Since 1945. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hooghe, M. and Kern, A. (2015) Party membership and closeness and the development of trust in political institutions: An analysis of the European Social Survey, 2002–2010. Party Politics 21 (6): 944–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jessee, S.A. (2010) Partisan bias, political information and spatial voting in the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Politics 72 (2): 327–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Johnston, R., Matthews, J.S. and Bittner, A. (2007) Turnout and the party system in Canada, 1988–2004. Electoral Studies 26 (4): 735–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kayser, M.A. and Wlezien, C. (2011) Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote. European Journal of Political Research 50 (3): 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lisi, M. (2015) Partisanship and age effects in recent democracies: Southern Europe from a comparative perspective. Comparative European Politics 13 (4): 493–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mair, P. (2002) In the aggregate: Mass electoral behaviour in Western Europe, 1950–2000. In: H. Keman (ed.) Comparative Democratic Politics. London: Sage, pp. 122–140.Google Scholar
  33. Marthaler, S. (2008) The paradox of the politically-sophisticated partisan: The French case. West European Politics 31 (5): 937–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mikhaylov, S. (2008) European Election Study (EES) Trend File (1989–2004), https://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_marsh/ees_trend_file.php.
  35. Pedersen, M. (1979) The dynamics of European party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility. European Journal of Political Science Research 7 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose, R. and McAllister, I. (1986) Voters Begin to Choose. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Särlvik, B. and Crewe, I. (1983) Decade of Dealignment: The Conservative Victory of 1979 and Electoral Trends in the 1970s. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Schmitt, H. (1989) On party attachment in Western Europe and the utility of Eurobarometer data. West European Politics 12 (2): 122–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmitt, H., Scholz, E., Leim, I. and Moschner, M. (2008) The Mannheim Eurobarometer Trend File 1970–2002 (ed. 2.00). European Commission [Principal investigator]. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA3521 Data file Version 2.0.1, doi:10.4232/1.10074.Google Scholar
  40. Schmitt, H. (2009) Partisanship in Nine Western Democracies. In: J. Bartle and P. Belluci (eds.) Political Parties and Partisanship. London: Routledge 75–87.Google Scholar
  41. Schmitt, H., Popa, S. A., Hobolt, S. B. and Teperoglou, E. (2015) European Parliament Election Study 2014, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5160 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1. 12300.Google Scholar
  42. Söderlund, P. (2008) Retrospective voting and electoral volatility: A nordic perspective. Scandinavian Political Studies 31 (2): 217–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tilley, J. and Hobolt, S.B. (2011) Is the government to blame? An experimental test of how partisanship shapes perceptions of performance and responsibility. Journal of Politics 73 (2): 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Biezen, I., Mair, P. and Poguntke, T. (2012) Going, going, … gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51 (1): 24–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. van der Eijk, C. and Marsh, M. (2011) Comparing non-ipsative measures of party support. Paper presented at the 1st European Conference on comparative electoral Research, 1–3 December, Sofia, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
  46. van Egmond, M., van der Brug, W., Hobolt, S.B., Franklin, M.N. and Sapir, E. V (2013) European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.1.0, doi: 10.4232/1.11760.Google Scholar
  47. Walczak, A., van der Brug, W. and de Vries, C.E. (2012) Long- and short-term determinants of party preferences: Inter-generational differences in Western and East central Europ. Electoral Studies 31 (2): 273–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zelle, C. (1995) Social dealignment versus political frustration: Contrasting explanations of the floating vote in Germany. European Journal of Political Research 27 (3): 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de science politique, Université de MontréalMontréalCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Citizenship and Democracy, University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations