Acta Politica

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 179–197 | Cite as

Lifestyle politics and the concept of political participation

Original Article

Abstract

Van Deth’s comprehensive ‘conceptual map of political participation’ has reinstated a lively debate about the concept of political participation, and provides some compelling solutions to it. However, an important question that has been raised is whether van Deth’s map actually achieves its main goal of unambiguously identifying and classifying emerging, complex types of participation, like online political activism – or lifestyle politics. To contribute to this debate, this article aims to evaluate the usefulness of van Deth’s approach for the analysis of lifestyle politics. Such an evaluation requires a clear classification of lifestyle politics. This, however, is still missing from the literature. The second aim of this article, therefore, is to identify and classify different types of lifestyle politics. On the basis of a literature review, this article argues that lifestyle politics are often enacted throughout different private, public and institutional arenas, and that they are often targeted at various social, economic and political actors at once. Applying van Deth’s conceptual map to these empirical realities, then, suggests that it cannot always account for their complexity sufficiently. Therefore, this article proposes a modification of van Deth’s framework that increases its usefulness for analyzing emerging, complex political participation repertoires.

Keywords

political participation lifestyle politics political consumerism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the reviewers of this journal and all participants in the Conceptualizing Political Participation Conference, September 2014, Mannheim, Germany, for their insightful comments to earlier versions of this article. Special thanks to Yannis Theocharis for helping with refining the article’s argument. This article was written with support of the European Research Council, project 295920 (Democratic Linkage).

References

  1. Balsiger, P. (2014) Between shaming corporations and promoting alternatives. An in-depth analysis of the tactical repertoire of a campaign for ethical fashion in Switzerland. Journal of Consumer Culture 14(2): 218–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes, S.H. and Kaase, M. (1979) Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA, London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1997) The Reinvention of Politics. Rethinking Modernity in the Global Social Order. Oxford: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Bennett, W.L. (1998) The uncivic culture: Communication, identity, and the rise of lifestyle politcs. PS: Political Science and Politics 31(4): 741–761.Google Scholar
  5. Bennett, W.L. (2012) The personalization of politics: Political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644(1): 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bossy, S. (2014) The utopias of political consumerism: The search of alternatives to mass consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture 14(2): 179–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brady, H.E. (1998) Political participation. In: J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver and L.S. Wrightsman (eds.) Measures of Political Attitudes. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 737–801.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, C. and Miller, S. (2008) The impacts of local markets: A review of research on farmers markets and community supported agriculture (CSA). American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90(5): 1296–1302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brunori, G., Rossi, A. and Guidi, F. (2012) On the new social relations around and beyond food. Analysing consumers’ role and action in Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale (solidarity purchasing groups). Sociologia Ruralis 52(1): 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Copeland, L. (2014) Conceptualizing political consumerism: How citizenship norms differentiate boycotting from buycotting. Political Studies 62(1): 172–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dalton, R.J. (2008) Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies 56(1): 76–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, J.C. (2015) [Review of the book greening the red, white, and blue: The bomb, big business, and consumer resistance in postwar America, by Thomas Jundt]. Enterprise & Society 16(1): 186–191.Google Scholar
  13. Della Porta, D. (2013) Can Democracy Be Saved? Participation, Deliberation, and Social Movements. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
  14. Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2015) From targets to recruits: The status of consumers within the political consumption movement. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39(5): 404–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dubuisson-Quellier, S., Lamine, C. and Le Velly, R. (2011) Citizenship and consumption: Mobilisation in alternative food systems in France. Sociologia Ruralis 51(3): 304–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Forno, F. (2015) Bringing together scattered and localized actors: Political consumerism as a tool for self-organizing anti-maffia communities. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39(5): 535–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forno, F. and Graziano, P.R. (2014) Sustainable community movement organisations. Journal of Consumer Culture 14(2): 139–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Forno, F. and Gunnarson, C. (2010) Everyday shopping to fight the maffia in Italy. In: M. Micheletti and A.S. McFarland (eds.) Creative Participation: Responsibility-Taking in the Political World. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, pp. 103–126.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, S. (2014) Is it time to update the definition of political participation? Political participation in Britain: The decline and revival of civic culture. Parliamentary Affairs 67(2): 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Furness, Z. (2010) Critical mass rides against car culture. In: J. Ilundáin-Agurruza and M.W. Austin (eds.) Cycling Philosophy for Everyone. A Philosophical Tour de Force. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 134–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity. Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  22. Graziano, P.R. and Forno, F. (2012) Political consumerism and new forms of political participation: The Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale in Italy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 644(1): 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Haenfler, R., Johnson, B. and Jones, E. (2012) Lifestyle movements: Exploring the intersection of lifestyle and social movements. Social Movement Studies 11(1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haydu, J. and Kadanoff, D. (2010) Casing political consumerism. Mobilization 15(2): 159–177.Google Scholar
  25. Holzer, B. (2005) Private choice and public influence: Political consumers behind the mirror of the market. In: M. Boström, A. Føllesdal, M. Klintman, M. Micheletti and M.P. Sørensen (eds.) Political Consumerism: Its Motivations, Power, and Conditions in the Nordic Countries and Elsewhere. Copenhagen, Denmark: TemaNord, pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
  26. Hooghe, M. (2014) Defining political participation: How to pinpoint an elusive target? Acta Politica 49(3): 337–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hosch-Dayican, B. (2014) Online political activities as emerging forms of political participation: Ho do they fit in the conceptual map? Acta Politica 49(3): 342–346.Google Scholar
  28. Klein, J.G., Smith, N.C. and John, A. (2004) Why we boycott: Consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing 68(3): 92–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lev, L., Stephenson, G. and Brewer, L. (2007) Practical research methods to enhance farmers markets. In: C.C. Hinrichs and T.A. Lyson (eds.) Remaking the North American Food System: Strategies for Sustainability. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, pp. 84–98.Google Scholar
  30. Lichterman, P. (1995) Beyond the seesaw model: Public commitment in a culture of self-fulfillment. Sociological Theory 13(3): 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lichterman, P. (1996) The Search for Political Community: American Activists Reinventing Commitment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Micheletti, M. (2003) Political Virtue and Shopping: Individuals, Consumerism, and Collective Action. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Micheletti, M. and Stolle, D. (2011) Vegetarianism – A lifestyle politics? In: M. Micheletti and A.S. McFarland (eds.) Creative Participation Responsibility-Taking in the Political World. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, pp. 125–145.Google Scholar
  34. Norris, P. (2002) Democratic Phoenix. Reinventing Political Activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parigi, P. and Gong, R. (2014) From grassroots to digital ties: A case study of a political consumerism movement. Journal of Consumer Culture 14: 236–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Portwood-Stacer, L. (2013) Lifestyle Politics and Radical Activism. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  37. Putnam, R.D. (2000) Bowling Alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schlosberg, D. and Coles, R. (2015) The new environmentalism of everyday life: Sustainability, material flows and movements. Contemporary Political Theory, advance online publication 30 June 2015 doi:10.1057/cpt.2015.34.Google Scholar
  39. Shah, D.V., McLeod, D.M., Kim, E., Gotlieb, M.R., Ho, S.S. and Breivik, H. (2007) Political consumerism: How communication and consumption orientations drive ‘lifestyle politics’. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611(1): 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sloam, J. (2007) Rebooting democracy: Youth participation in politics in the UK. Parliamentary Affairs 60(4): 548–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stolle, D., Hooghe, M. and Micheletti, M. (2005) Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review 26(3): 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Theocharis, Y. (2015) Is digitally networked participation a form of political participation? In: T. Poguntke, S. Roßteutscher, R. Schmitt-Beck and S. Zmerli (eds.) Citizenship and Democracy in An Era of Crisis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. van Deth, J.W. (2011) Is creative participation good for democracy? In: M. Micheletti and A.S. McFarland (eds.) Creative Participation Responsibility-Taking in the Political World. London: Paradigm, pp. 148–172.Google Scholar
  44. van Deth, J.W. (2014) A conceptual map of political participation. Acta Politica 49(3): 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Van Dyke, N., Soule, S.A. and Taylor, V.A. (2004) The targets of social movements: Beyond a focus on the state. Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change 25: 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Gameren, V., Ruwet, C. and Bauler, T. (2014) Towards a governance of sustainable consumption transitions: How institutional factors influence emerging local food systems in Belgium. Local Environment (August 2014): 1–18http://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2013.872090.
  47. Verba, S. and Nie, N.H. (1972) Participation in America. Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  48. Verba, S., Schlozman, K.L. and Brady, H.E. (1995) Voice and Equality. Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, US: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Wahlen, S. and Laamanen, M. (2015) Consumption, lifestyle and social movements. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39(5): 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zamwel, E., Sasson-Levy, O. and Ben-Porat, G. (2014) Voluntary simplifiers as political consumers: Individuals practicing politics through reduced consumption. Journal of Consumer Culture 14(2): 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, X. (2015) ‘Voting with dollars’: A cross-polity and multilevel analysis of political consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies 39(5): 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media, Movements and Politics (M2P), University of AntwerpAntwerpenBelgium

Personalised recommendations