Advertisement

Acta Politica

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 369–371 | Cite as

The economic voter and economic crisis

  • Ruth Dassonneville
  • Michael S Lewis-Beck
Introduction

Theories of economic voting have a long tradition in political science and continue to inspire a large group of scholars. Classical economic voting theory assumes a reward-and-punishment mechanism (Key, 1966). This mechanism implies that incumbents are more likely to stay in power under a good economy, but are cast out under a bad economy (Lewis-Beck and Stegmaier, 2000). The economy has repeatedly been shown to be a major determinant of electoral behavior (see especially the recent book by Duch and Stevenson, 2008), but the current economic crisis seems to provide a marked illustration of how the economy affects voting. In recent elections across the Western industrialized world, most ruling coalitions lost their majority. Opposition parties, on the other hand, whether right wing or left wing, have appeared to benefit from the economic downturn.

The clear pattern of voters punishing their government during the current economic crisis does raise the question whether the impact of the...

References

  1. Bellucci, P., Costa Lobo, M. and Lewis-Beck, M.S (eds.) (2012) Economic crisis and elections: The European periphery, special symposium. Electoral Studies 33 (3): 469–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duch, R.M. and Stevenson, R.T. (2008) The Economic Vote. How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hellwig, T. (2001) Interdependence, government constraints, and economic voting. The Journal of Politics 63 (4): 1141–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kayser, M. and Peress, M. (2012) Benchmarking across borders: Electoral accountability and the necessity of comparison. American Political Science Review 106 (3): 661–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kayser, M.A. and Wlezien, C. (2011) Performance pressure: Patterns of partisanship and the economic vote. European Journal of Political Research 50 (3): 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Key, V.O. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1966. Cambridge, US: Belknap Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science 3 (1): 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Dassonneville
    • 1
  • Michael S Lewis-Beck
    • 2
  1. 1.University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.University of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations