Acta Politica

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 372–394 | Cite as

Macroeconomics, economic crisis and electoral outcomes: A national European pool

Original Article

Abstract

An abundance of comparative survey research argues the presence of economic voting as an individual force in European elections, thereby refuting a possible ecological fallacy. But the hypothesis of economic voting at the aggregate level, with macroeconomics influencing overall electoral outcomes, seems less sure. Indeed, there might be a micrological fallacy at work, with the supposed individual economic vote effect not adding up to a national electoral effect after all. Certainly that would account for the spotty evidence linking macroeconomics and national election outcomes. We examine the possibility of a micrological fallacy through rigorous analysis of a large time-series-cross-sectional data set of European nations. From these results, it becomes clear that the macroeconomy strongly moves national election outcomes, with hard times punishing governing parties, and good times rewarding them. Further, this economy–election connection appears asymmetric, altering under economic crisis. Indeed, we show that economic crisis, defined as negative growth, has much greater electoral effects than positive economic growth. Hard times clearly make governments more accountable to their electorates.

Keywords

economic voting macroeconomics economic crisis time-series-cross-sectional data micrological fallacy 

References

  1. Adolph, C., Butler, D.M. and Wilson, S.E. (2005) Like Shoes and Shirt, One Size does not Fit All: Evidence on Time Series Cross-Section Estimators and Specifications from Monte Carlo Experiments. Paper presented at the 101st Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association; 31 August–3 September, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P.D. (2009) Fixed Effects Regression Models. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, C.J. (2000) Economic voting and political context: A comparative perspective. Electoral Studies 19 (2/3): 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, C.J. (2007) The end of economic voting? Contingency dilemmas and the limits of democratic accountability. Annual Review of Political Science 10: 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. (1995) What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89 (3): 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, N. and Katz, J.N. (2009) Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Pasadena (CA): Division of the Humanities and Social Sciences, California Institute of Technology. Social Science Working paper 1304.Google Scholar
  7. Bellucci, P., Costa Lobo, M. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2012) Economic crisis and elections: The European periphery. Electoral Studies 31 (3): 649–671.Google Scholar
  8. Bélanger, E. and Meguid, B. (2008) Issue salience, issue ownership, and issue-based vote choice. Electoral Studies 27 (3): 477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bengtsson, A. (2004) Economic voting: The effect of political context, volatility and turnout on voters’ assignment of responsibility. European Journal of Political Research 43 (5): 749–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blackburn, S. (2008) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Borre, O. (1997) Economic voting in Danish electoral surveys 1987–1994. Scandinavian Political Studies 20 (4): 347–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chappell, H.W.J. and Veiga, L.G. (2000) Economics and elections in western Europe: 1960-1997. Electoral Studies 19 (2-3): 183–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Döring, H. and Manow, P. (2012) Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): An infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections and governments in modern democracies, Version 12/10 – 15 October 2012.Google Scholar
  14. Duch, R.M. (2007) Comparative studies of the economy and the vote. In: C. Boix and S. Stokes (eds.) Encyclopedia of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Duch, R.M. and Stevenson, R.T. (2008) The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Escobar-Lemmon, M. and Whitten, G. (2011) Special symposium on the politics of economic crisis. Electoral Studies 30 (3): 387–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, G. and Andersen, R. (2006) The political conditioning of economic perceptions. Journal of Politics 68 (1): 194–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fernandez-Albertos, J. (2006) Does internationalisation blur responsibility? Economic voting and economic openness in 15 European countries. West European Politics 29 (1): 28–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fidrmuc, J. (2000) Economics of voting in post-communist countries. Electoral Studies 19 (2–3): 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiorina, M.P. (1981) Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Fournier, P., Blais, A., Nadeau, R., Gidengil, E. and Nevitte, N. (2003) Issue importance and performance voting. Political Behavior 25 (1): 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gallagher, M. (2012) Electoral systems website, http://www.tcd.ie/Political_Science/staff/michael_gallagher/ElSystems/, accessed August 2013.
  23. Hellwig, T. (2008) Globalization, policy constraints and vote choice. Journal of Politics 70 (4): 1128–1141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hellwig, T. (2010) Context, information, and performance voting. In: R.J. Dalton and C.J. Anderson (eds.) Citizens, Context, and Choice: How Context Shapes Citizens’ Electoral Choices. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 149–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hox, J.J. (2010) Multilevel Analysis. Techniques and Applications. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. IMF. (2013) World Economic Outlook Database, April, http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2013/01/weodata/download.aspx, accessed August 2013.
  27. Judson, K.A. and Owen, A.L. (1999) Estimating dynamic panel data models: A guide for macroeconomics. Economic Letters 65 (1): 9–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Key, V.O.J. (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting 1936–1960. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kiewiet, D.R. (1983) Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kramer, G. (1983) The ecological fallacy revisited: Aggregate- versus individual-level findings on economics and elections, and sociotropic voting. American Political Science Review 77 (1): 92–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Laakso, M. and Taagepera, R. (1979) The ‘effective’ number of parties: A measure with application to west Europe. Comparative Political Studies 12 (1): 3–27.Google Scholar
  32. Lau, R.R. (1985) Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science 29 (1): 119–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. LeDuc, L. and Pammett, J.H. (2013) The fate of governing parties in times of economic crisis. Electoral Studies 32 (3): 494–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1983) Economics and the French voter: A microanalysis. Public Opinion Quarterly 47 (3): 347–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lewis-Beck, M.S. (1988) Economics and Elections. The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  36. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Costa Lobo, M. and Bellucci, P. (2012) Special symposium: economic crisis and elections: The European periphery. Electoral Studies 31 (3): 469–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Jacoby, W.G., Norpoth, H. and Weisberg, H.F. (2008) The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Lockerbie, B. (1989) Economics, votes, protests: Western European cases. Comparative Political Studies 22 (2): 155–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Nadeau, R. (2012) PIGS or not? Economic voting in southern Europe. Electoral Studies 31 (3): 472–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Sciences 3 (1): 183–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Stegmaier, M. (2007) Economic models of voting. In: R.J. Dalton and H.-D. Klingeman (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 518–537.Google Scholar
  42. Lewis-Beck, M.S., Martini, N.F. and Kiewiet, D.R. (2013) The nature of economic perceptions in mass publics. Electoral Studies 32 (3): 524–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Whitten, G. D. (2013) Special symposium. Economics and elections: Effects deep and wide. Electoral Studies 32 (3): 391–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mackie, T.T. and Rose, R. (1991) The International Almanac of Electoral History. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marsh, L.C. and Cormier, D.R. (2002) Spline Regression Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Marshall, M.G. and Gurr, T.R. (2012) Polity IV Project: Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2012, http://www.systemicpeace.org/polity/polity4.htm, accessed August 2013.
  47. Nadeau, R., Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Bélanger, E. (2013) Economics and elections revisited. Comparative Political Studies 46 (5): 551–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nadeau, R., Niemi, R.G. and Yoshinaka, A. (2002) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political contexts across time and nations. Electoral Studies 21 (3): 403–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (1994) The VP function: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after 25 years. Public Choice 79 (3-4): 213–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nannestad, P. and Paldam, M. (1997) The grievance asymmetry revisited: A micro study of economic voting in Denmark, 1986–1992. European Journal of Political Economy 13 (1): 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nordsieck, W. (2013) Parties and elections in Europe, http://www.parties-and-elections.eu, accessed August 2013.
  52. Norpoth, H. (1996) The economy. In: L. Leduc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Global Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 299–318.Google Scholar
  53. Norpoth, H., Lewis-Beck, M.S. and Lafay, J.D. (1991) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  54. Paldam, M. (1991) How robust is the vote function? A study of seventeen nations over four decades. In: H. Norpoth, M.S. Lewis-Beck and J.D. Lafay (eds.) Economics and Politics: The Calculus of Support. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
  55. Powell, G.B. and Whitten, G.D. (1993) A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Robinson, W.S. (1950) Ecological correlation and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review 15 (3): 351–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanders, D. (2003) Party identification, economic perceptions, and voting in British general elections, 1974–1997. Electoral Studies 22 (2): 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Singer, M. (2011a) Who says ‘It’s the economy’? Cross-national and cross-individual variation in the salience of economic performance. Comparative Political Studies 44 (3): 284–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Singer, M. (2011b) When do voters actually think ‘It’s the economy’? Evidence from the 2008 presidential campaign. Electoral Studies 30 (4): 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Soroka, S.N. (2006) Good news and bad news: Asymmetric responses to economic information. The Journal of Politics 68 (2): 372–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stegmaier, M. and Lewis-Beck, M.S. (2013) Economic voting. In: R. Valelly (ed.) Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. The Conference Board. (2013) Total economy database: Real Gross Domestic Product, http://www.conference-board.org/data/economydatabase, accessed August 2013.
  63. The World Bank. (2013a) Data: Imports of goods and services (% of GDP), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.IMP.GNFS.ZS, accessed August 2013.
  64. The World Bank. (2013b) Data: Exports of goods and services (% of GDP), http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NE.EXP.GNFS.ZS, accessed August 2013.
  65. Tufte, E.R. (1978) Political Control of the Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  66. van der Brug, W., van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M. (2007) The Economy and the Vote: Economic Conditions and Elections in Fifteen Countries. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. van der Eijk, C., Franklin, M., Demant, F. and van der Brug, W. (2007) The endogenous economy: ‘Real’ economic conditions, subjective economic evaluations and government support. Acta Politica 42 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilken, S., Haller, B. and Norpoth, H. (1997) From Argentina to Zambia: A world-wide test of economic voting. Electoral Studies 16 (3): 301–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations