An asymmetric group relation? An investigation into public perceptions of education-based groups and the support for populism

Abstract

This article attempts to advance the recent discussion in this journal about the alleged growth of a ‘diploma democracy’ by introducing insights from theory of group relations, as well as presenting new empirical data. At the theoretical level, we argue that the relationship between the higher and lower educated should be seen as an asymmetric group relation. Such a relationship is unlikely to result in open educational conflict, without implying the complete absence of frustrations and tensions between groups defined on the obtained educational level. At the empirical level, we report on the results of a survey project in Flanders, allowing us to investigate to what extent the public opinion perceives educational conflict and demonstrate that this perception is consistently related to support for a core element of contemporary populism.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    To increase the concept validity of our scale, we replaced the item ‘the interests of people with low and people with high education are often the same’ by the item ‘people with high and low education do not understand each other well’. Furthermore, we did not use the item ‘people with high/low education often want to lead society in a wrong direction’ because while testing the questionnaire several respondents wondered what we meant with ‘a wrong direction’.

  2. 2.

    Due to their high correlation, both attitudes were combined. Results for both lack of political efficacy and anti-democratic sentiment separately are available upon request.

  3. 3.

    The findings should not be interpreted at face value, as they reflect agreement with items formulated by the researchers. Hakhverdian et al (2012) emphasised correctly that at present no political party uses this to rally support.

References

  1. Abercrombie, N. and Turner, B.S. (1978) The dominant ideology thesis. British Journal of Sociology 29 (2): 149–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Achterberg, P. and Houtman, D. (2009) Ideologically illogical? Why do the lower-educated Dutch display so little value coherence? Social Forces 87 (3): 1649–1670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bechhofer, F., Elliott, B. and McCrone, D. (1978) Structure, consciousness and action: A sociological profile of the British middle class. British Journal of Sociology 29 (4): 410–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Betz, H.-G. (1990) Politics of resentment: Right-wing radicalism in West Germany. Comparative Politics 23 (1): 45–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonilla-Silva, E.L.A. and Embrick, D.G. (2004) ‘I did not get that job because of a black many’: The story lines and testimonies of color-blind racism. Sociological Forum 19 (4): 555–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bourdieu, P. (1984 [1979]) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bourdieu, P. (1990) Sociology in Question. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bovens, M. and Wille, A. (2010) The education gap in political participation and its political consequences. Acta Politica 45 (4): 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bovens, M. and Wille, A. (2011) Diplomademocratie. Over de spanning tussen meritocratie en democratie. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Uitgeverij Bert Bakker.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Canovan, M. (1984) ‘People’, politicians and populism. Government and Opposition 19 (3): 312–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Canovan, M. (1999) Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies 47 (1): 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Centers, R. (1961 [1949]) The Psychology of Social Classes: A Study of Class Consciousness. New York: Russell and Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Claeys, J., Sanctobin, S. and Spruyt, B. (2011) Technisch verslag SNEL 2010 onderzoek. Brussel, Belgium: Onderzoeksgroep TOR.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cuneo, C.J. (1996) International images of social inequality: A ten-country comparison. In: A. Frizzel and J.H. Pammett (eds.) Social Inequality in Canada. Ottowa, Canada: Carleton, pp. 31–66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dekker, P. and Van der Meer, T. (2009) Opleidingsverschillen verder onderzocht. In: P. Dekker, T. Van der Meer, P. Schyns and E. Steenvoorden (eds.) Crisis in aantocht? Den Haag, the Netherlands: SCP, pp. 135–152.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Derks, A. (2001) Individualisme Zonder Verhaal. Brussel, Belgium: VUB Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Derks, A. (2006) Populism and the ambivalence of egalitarianism: How do the underprivileged reconcile a right wing party preference with their socio-economic attitudes? World Political Science Review 2 (3): 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Diani, M. (1996) Linking mobilization frames and political opportunities: Insights from regional populism. American Sociological Review 61 (6): 1053–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Emler, N. and Frazer, E. (1999) Politics: The education effect. Oxford Review of Education 25 (1–2): 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Elchardus, M. and Spruyt, B. (2012) The contemporary contradictions of egalitarianism: An empirical analysis of the relationship between the old and the new left/right alignments. European Political Science Review 4 (2): 217–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gesthuizen, M., De Graaf, P.M. and Kraaykamp, G. (2005) The changing family background of the low-educated in the Netherlands: Socio-economic, cultural, and socio-demographic resources. European Sociological Review 21 (5): 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gurin, P., Miller, A.H. and Gurin, G. (1980) Stratum identification and consciousness. Social Psychology Quarterly 43 (1): 30–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hakhverdian, A., van der Brug, W. and de Vries, C. (2012) The emergence of a ‘diploma democracy’? The political education gap in the Netherlands, 1971–2010. Acta Politica 47 (3): 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hogg, M.A. (2000) Subjective uncertainty reduction through self-categorization: A motivational theory of social identity processes. European Review of Social Psychology 11 (1): 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hogg, M.A., Hohmann, Z.P. and Rivera, J.E. (2008) Why do people join groups? Three motivational accounts from social psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2 (3): 1269–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jackman, M.R. (1994) The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jackman, M.R. and Muha, M.J. (1984) Education and intergroup attitudes: Moral enlightenment, superficial democratic commitment, or ideological refinement? American Sociological Review 49 (6): 751–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jackson, J.W. (1993) Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. The Psychological Record 43 (3): 395–413.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Jagers, J. and Walgrave, S. (2007) Populism as political communications style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research 46 (3): 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jansen, R.S. (2011) Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory 29 (2): 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lucardie, P. (2010) Tussen establishment en extremisme: Populistische partijen in Nederland en Vlaanderen. Res Publica 52 (2): 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mény, Y. and Surel, Y. (2002) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Mudde, C. (2004) The populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition 39 (4): 541–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Panizza, F. (2005) Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In: F. Panizza (ed.) Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, pp. 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Pasquino, G. (2008) Populism and democracy. In: D. Albertazzi and D. McDonnell (eds.) Twenty-First Century Populism: The Spectre of Western European Democracy. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Quintelier, E. (2007) Differences in political participation between young and old people. Contemporary Politics 13 (2): 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ridder, J.D. and Dekker, P. (2011) Opvattingen over sociale mobiliteit en opleidingsverschillen. Den Haag, the Netherlands: Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rooduijn, M., de Lange, S. and Van Der Brug, W. (2012) A populist Zeitgeist? Programmic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, in press. doi: 10.1177/1354068811436065.

  39. Solga, H. (2002) ‘Stigmatization by negative selection’: Explaining less-educated people’s decreasing employment opportunities. European Sociological Review 18 (2): 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Spruyt, B. (2012) Ongeschoold maakt onbemind: Een thematische inhoudsanalyse van de voorstelling van laag- en hooggeschoolden in twee Vlaamse kranten. Tijdschrift voor Communicatiewetenschap 40 (3): 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stanley, B. (2008) The thin ideology of populism. Journal of Political Ideologies 13 (1): 95–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Stubager, R. (2009) Education-based group identity and consciousness in the authoritarian-libertarian value conflict. European Journal of Political Research 48 (2): 204–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Taggart, P. (2002) Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In: Y. Mény and Y. Surel (eds.) Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 62–80.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J.C. (1986) The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: S. Worchel and W.G. Austin (eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall, pp. 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Waterborg, J., Lucas, K. and Lindeboom, G.-J. (2012) Tensions between meritocracy and democracy? A reply to the diploma democracy thesis. Acta Politica 47 (3): 248–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Wiles, P. (1969) A syndrome, not a doctrine: Some elementary theses on populism. In: G. Ionesco and E. Gellner (eds.) Populism. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, pp. 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zinn, H. (1968) Disobedience and Democracy: Nine Fallacies on Law and Order. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spruyt, B. An asymmetric group relation? An investigation into public perceptions of education-based groups and the support for populism. Acta Polit 49, 123–143 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2013.9

Download citation

Keywords

  • education
  • group relations
  • populism