A sequential analysis of democratic deliberation
- 61 Downloads
Recent developments in deliberative democratic theory have witnessed a renegotiation of classic deliberative principles to conceptualise the form deliberation could take under suboptimal speech situations. Application of deliberative virtues is negotiated, suggesting that different contexts warrant different deliberative expectations. Such approach presents a topical model of deliberation but it also raises concerns regarding the extent of these norms’ negotiability, whether there remain core deliberative virtues that cannot be compromised regardless of the context. This piece addresses this theoretical challenge by putting forward a sequential analysis of democratic deliberation. It draws on pragma-dialectics, an approach to the study of argumentation that examines how a ‘difference of opinion’ is handled in practice. It suggests that deliberative norms and discursive tactics have specialised functions at particular moments of exchange while retaining focus on components that make deliberation a distinct form of political practice.
Keywordsdeliberative democracy argumentation theory activism
I would like to thank John Dryzek, Andrew Knops and the anonymous reviewers for the constructive feedback on the earlier drafts of this paper.
- Eemeren, F.H. van and Grootendorst, R. (2004) A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragma-Dialectical Approach. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Eemeren, F.H. van, Grootendorst, R. and Henkemans, F.S. (2002) Argumentation: Analysis, Evaluation, Presentation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Festenstein, M. (2002) Deliberation, citizenship and identity. In: M.P. d’Entrèves (ed.) Democracy as Public Deliberation. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press, pp. 88–111.Google Scholar
- Habermas, J. (1998) What is universal pragmatics? In: M. Cooke (ed.) On the Pragmatics of Communication. Massachusetts: MIT Press, pp. 21–104.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. (2007) Recognising the passion in deliberation: Toward a more democratic theory of deliberative democracy. Hypatia 22 (4): 81–95.Google Scholar
- Kadlec, A. and Friedman, W. (2007) Deliberative democracy and the problem of power. Journal of Public Deliberation 3 (1): 1–26.Google Scholar
- Mansbridge, J. (1999) Everyday talk in the deliberative system. In: S. Macedo (ed.) Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–239.Google Scholar
- Mansbridge, J., Hartz-Karp, J., Amenqual, M. and Gastil, J. (2006) Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation 2 (1): 1–47.Google Scholar
- Mouffe, C. (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Vedung, E. (1987) Rational argumentation and political deception. In: F.H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J.A. Blair and Ch. A. Willard (eds.) Argumentation: Across the Lines of Discipline. Proceedings of the Conference on Argumentation. Dordrecht, MA/Providence, RI: Foris Publications, PDA 3, pp. 353–364.Google Scholar
- Young, I.M. (1996) Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative democracy. In: S. Benhabib (ed.) Democracy and Difference. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 120–135.Google Scholar