Electoral volatility, political sophistication, trust and efficacy: A study on changes in voter preferences during the Belgian regional elections of 2009
In this article, we investigate voter volatility and analyse the causes and motives of switching vote intentions. We test two main sets of variables linked to volatility in literature; political sophistication and political disaffection. Results show that voters with low levels of political efficacy tend to switch more often, both within a campaign and between elections. In the analysis, we differentiate between campaign volatility and inter-election volatility, and by doing so show that the dynamics of a campaign have a profound impact on volatility. The campaign period is when the lowly sophisticated switch their vote intention. Those with higher levels of interest in politics have switched their intention before the campaign has started. The data for this analysis are from the three wave PartiRep Belgian Election Study (2009).
Keywordspolitical sophistication political trust political efficacy campaign volatility inter-election volatility timing of vote decision
I gratefully acknowledge the generous support provided by the Belgian Federal Science Agency to the ‘Partirep’ (Participation and Representation) project, as part of the Inter-University Attraction Pole programme (www.partirep.eu). I would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers of Acta Politica for their critical but very useful comments and insights.
- Baudewyns, P., Frognier, A. and Swyngedouw, M. (2009) Elections régionales en Wallonie: les transferts de voix entre les partis entre 2007 et 2009. Louvain-la-neuve: België: UCL. PIOP 2009-2, http://www.piop.be.
- Berelson, B.R., Lazarsfeld, P.F. and McPhee, W.N. (1963) Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago, IL/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Blais, A. (2004) How many voters change their minds in the month preceding an election? PS Political Science and Politics 37 (4): 801–803.Google Scholar
- Botterman, S. and Hooghe, M. (forthcoming) Religion and voting behaviour in Belgium. An analysis of the relation between religious beliefs and Christian Democratic Voting. Acta Politica, in press.Google Scholar
- Campbell, A., Philip, C., Miller, W. and Stokes, D. (1960) The American Voter. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Dalton, R.J. (2006) Citizen Politics. Public Opinion and Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
- Delli Carpini, M.S. and Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans know about Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
- Deschouwer, K. (2009) The Politics of Belgium: Governing a Divided Society. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2009) Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Granberg, D. and Holmberg, S. (1988) The Political System Matters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hooghe, M. and Walgrave, S. (2010) Opkomstplicht en politieke kennis: de onwetende burger aan het woord? In: K. Deschouwer, P. Delwit, M. Hooghe and S. Walgrave (eds.) De stemmen van het volk. Een analyse van het kiesgedrag in Vlaanderen en Wallonië op 7 juni 2009. Brussel: VUB Press, pp. 143–167.Google Scholar
- Lachat, R. (2007) A Heterogeneous Electorate. Political Sophistication, Predisposition Strength and the Voting Decision Process. Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P.F., Berelson, B.R. and Gaudet, H. (1965) The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Lisi, M. (2010) The consequences of cognitive mobilisation in comparative perspective: Political sophistication and voting behavior in old and new democracies. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association; 2–5 September, Washington, United States.Google Scholar
- Mair, P. (2002) In the aggregate: Mass electoral behaviour in Western Europe, 1950–2000. In: H. Keman (ed.) Comparative Democratic Politics. London: Sage, pp. 122–140.Google Scholar
- PartiRep. (2009) Belgian election study 2009. Data file. Brussels/Leuven/Antwerp: PartiRep, http://www.partirep.eu.
- Quintelier, E., Hooghe, M. and Marien, S. (forthcoming) The effect of compulsory voting on turnout stratification patterns. A cross-national analysis. International Political Science Review, In press.Google Scholar
- Sears, D.O. (1981) Life-stage effects on attitude change, especially among the elderly. In: S.B. Kiesler, J.N. Morgan and V.K. Oppenheimer (eds.) Aging: Social Change. New York: Academic Press, pp. 183–204.Google Scholar
- Thomassen, J. and Rosema, M. (2009) Party identification revisited. In: J. Bartle and P. Belluci (eds.) Political Parties and Partisanship. Social Identity and Individual Attitudes. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 42–95.Google Scholar
- Torcal, M. and Montero, J.R. (2006) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J. and Hooghe, M. (2010) Volatiel of wispelturig? Hoeveel en welke kiezers veranderden van stemvoorkeur tijdens de campagne? In: K. Deschouwer, P. Delwit, M. Hooghe and S. Walgrave (eds.) De stemmen van het volk. Een analyse van het kiesgedrag in Vlaanderen en Wallonië op 7 juni 2009. Brussel, Belgium: VUB Press, pp. 29–50.Google Scholar
- Zaller, J. (2000) Floating voters in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1948–2000. In: W.E. Saris and P.M. Sniderman (eds.) Studies in Public Opinion: Attitudes, Nonattitudes, Measurement Error, and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 166–214.Google Scholar