Skip to main content

Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective

Abstract

This paper places the current wave of Dutch electoral volatility within a comparative European context, and emphasizes its exceptional character. Evidence of Dutch exceptionalism in terms of the broad patterns of electoral change that have developed across the post-war years is reviewed, and the focus is then narrowed to the evidence from very recent elections. One of the major factors accounting for the current high levels of volatility is the relative openness of the party system. Evidence of the patterns of government alternation shows that the Dutch party system is relatively unstructured, but it was only when depillarization was more or less complete that the real effect of this openness kicked in.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. This paper incorporates and builds on two earlier Dutch language papers: Mair (2002b) and Mair (2003). I am grateful to Hans Keman and an anonymous reviewer for comments on an earlier version.

  2. That is, these are the two factors that I wish to highlight for the purpose of this paper and that I regard as key elements in the explanation of electoral change. Other factors might also prove relevant, of course, but I cannot test for these within the scope of this present research.

  3. The two principal sources that I have used to compile these data are Woldendorp et al. (2000) and Müller and Strøm (2000). I have excluded the French case of France, which, because of the large role accorded to so-called ‘independents’ or non-partisan cabinet members during both the fourth and fifth Republics, is not easily analysed in terms of shifting patterns of partisan alternation. The inclusion of the French case is also complicated by its non-comparable presidential system. The data for Malta do not include the 1950s. A more complete presentation of the data and an analysis can be seen in Mair (2007).

  4. Values for IGA apply only to cases of changes in the partisan composition of government, that is when one or more parties step in and/or when one or more parties step out, and I take no account of reshuffles within strictly persisting partisan constellations.

  5. The CDA and VVD had governed together in the late 1970s and the mid-1980s, albeit never before in combination with D66. D66 later pulled out of the coalition in June 2006 in the wake of the controversy surrounding the citizenship status of Ayaan Hirsi Ali, the crisis that also led to the 2006 election.

References

  • Andeweg, R.B. and Irwin, G.A. (2005) Governance and Politics of the Netherlands, (2nd edn, London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolini, S. and Mair, P. (1990) Identity, Competition and Electoral Availability, Cambridge: Cambrdge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M.N. and Mackie, T.T. (1983) ‘Familiarity and inertia in the formation of governing coalitions in parliamentary democracies’, British Journal of Political Science 13 (3): 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M., Laver, M. and Mair, P. (2005) Representative Government in Modern Europe, 4th edn, New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2007) ‘The Dutch Parliamentary Elections of 2006’, West European Politics 30 (5): 1139–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Holsteyn, J.J.M. and Irwin, G.A. (2003) ‘Never a dull moment: Pim Fortuyn and the Dutch Parliamentary Election of 2002’, West European Politics 26 (2): 41–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houska, J.J. (1985) Influencing Mass Electoral Behavior: Elites and Political Subcultures in the Netherlands and Austria, Berkeley: University of California, Institute of International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, G. and van Holsteyn, J.J.M. (2003) ‘They say it can't be done: Strategic voting in multi-party proportional systems: The case of the Netherlands’, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association.

  • Keman, H. and Krouwel, A. (2007) ‘The rise of a new political class: emerging new parties and the populist challenge’, epsNET KIOSK PLUS. The NET Journal of Political Science 5 (1): 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koole, R. and van Praag, P. (1990) ‘Electoral competition in a segmented society: campaign strategies and the importance of elite perceptions’, European Journal of Political Research 18 (1): 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2002a) ‘Comparing Party Systems’, in L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds.) Comparing Democracies 2: New Challenges in the Study of Elections and Voting, London: Sage, pp. 88–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2002b) ‘De eigenaardigheden van de Nederlanders: De verkiezingen van 2002 in een vergelijkend perspectief’, Beleid & Maatschappij 29 (3): 160–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2003) ‘Hoe gewoon is gewoon?’ Beleid & Maatschappij 30 (2): 142–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (2007) ‘Party Systems and Alternation in Government, 1950–2000: Innovation and Institutionalisation’, in S. Gloppen and L. Rakner (eds.) Globalisation and Democratisation: Challenges for Political Parties, Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 135–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. and van Biezen, I. (2001) ‘Party membership in twenty european democracies, 1980–2000’, Party Politics 7 (1): 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W.C. and Strøm, K. (eds.) (2000) Coalition Governments in Western Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, M.N. (1979) ‘The dynamics of european party systems: Changing patterns of electoral volatility’, European Journal of Political Research 7 (1): 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, M.N. (1988) ‘The Defeat of All Parties: The Danish Folketing Election, 1973’, in K. Lawson and P.H. Merkl (eds.) When Parties Fail: Emerging Alternative Organizations, Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 257–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rokkan, S. (1970) Citizens, Elections, Parties, Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, R. and McAllister, I. (1992) ‘Expressive Versus Instrumental Voting’, in D. Kavanagh (ed.) Electoral Politics: Essays in Honour of David Butler, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 114–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldendorp, J., Keman, H. and Budge, I. (2000) Party Government in 43 Societies, Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mair, P. Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective. Acta Polit 43, 235–253 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2008.1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2008.1

Keywords

  • electoral volatility
  • Netherlands
  • government alternation
  • party system
  • electoral constraint