A SPECIAL LEARNING EXPERIENCE ABOUT TRANSFERENCE AND COUNTERTRANSFERENCE DYNAMICS AT THE BEGINNING OF MY PSYCHOANALYTIC TRAINING

Abstract

Drawing upon his description of the early phases of the analysis of the second case of official supervision, the author illustrates in his work why this experience became a foundational moment in his formative trajectory as a psychoanalyst. Three important aspects are discussed: (1) the significant role his supervisor played in helping to manage and to confront the difficult dynamics of transference and countertransference that characterized the author’s early years of analytic work with patients; (2) the transformative factors that opened up new avenues in the repetition and the original traumatic pathology put forward at great length by the patient; and (3) the making contact for the first time with that area of inter/intrapsychic phenomena that the author has since then explored widely and theorized about, under the name of relational dynamics governed by role-reversal.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bass, A. (2003). “E” enactments in psychoanalysis: Another medium, another message. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13 (5), 657–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonomi, C. (2014). Book review of The girl who committed Hara-Kiri and other clinical and historical essays by Franco Borgogno. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 74 (4), 382–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Borgogno, F. (1994–1995). From co-created environment to words and personal history: Transference, countertransference, and working-through in a long analysis of a deprived schizoid patient. Unpublished manuscript.

  4. Borgogno, F. (1999). Psicoanalisi come percorso. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. [Psychoanalysis as a journey]. London: Open Gate Press, 2007.

  5. Borgogno, F. (2004). On the patient’s becoming an individual: The importance of the analyst’s personal response to a deprived patient and to her dreams. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 14 (4), 475–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgogno, F. (2007). The Vancouver interview. Roma: Borla.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Borgogno, F. (2011a). La Signorina che faceva hara-kiri e altri saggi. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri. [The girl who committed Hara-Kiri and other clinical and historical essays]. London: Karnac 2013.

  8. Borgogno, F. (2011b). Sándor Ferenczi, the “introjective psychoanalyst”. American Imago, 68 (2), 155–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Borgogno, F. (2014). “Coming from afar” and “temporarily becoming the patient without knowing it”: Two necessary analytic conditions according to Ferenczi’s later thought. American Journal of Pychoanalysis, 74 (4), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borgogno, F. & Vigna-Taglianti, M. (2008). Role-reversal: A somewhat neglected mirror of heritages of the past. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 68 (4), 313–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Borgogno, F. & Vigna-Taglianti, M. (2013). Role-reversal and the dissociation of the self. Actions signaling memories to be recovered: an exploration of a somewhat neglected transference-countertransference process. In R. Oelsner (Ed.) Transference and countertransference today (pp. 289–313). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freud, S. (1936). Inhibitions, symptoms and anxiety. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 5 (1), 415–443.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grinberg, L. (1963). Guilt and depression. London: Karnac 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grotstein, J. (2004). The seventh servant: The implications of a truth drive in Bion’s theory of “O”. International Journal Psycho-Analysis, 85 (5), 1081–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoffer, A. & Buie, D. H. (2016). Helplessness and the analyst’s war against feeling it. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 76 (1), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacobs, T. J. (2013). The possible profession. The analytic process of change. New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Levenson, E. A. (1982). Follow the fox—An inquiry into the vicissitudes of psychoanalytic supervision. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18 (1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lia, M. (2011). Alcune riflessioni su controtransfert, empatia e osservazione [Some considerations on countertransference, empathy and observation]. In F. Borgogno & G. Cassullo (Eds.) Le molte facce del trauma [The many faces of trauma] (pp. 63–90). Roma: Borla.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Marucco, N. C. (2006). Actualización del concepto de trauma en la clínica analítica [Actualization of the concept of trauma in the psychoanalytic work]. Revista de Psicoanálisis [by Asociación Psicoanalítica Argentina], 63 (1), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Roussillon, R. (1991). Paradoxes et situations limites de la psychanalyse [Paradoxes and borderline situations in psychoanalysis]. París: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Roussillon, R. (1995). Logiques et archéologiques du cadre psychanalytique [Logics and archaelogics of the psychoanalytic setting]. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sapisochin, G. (2013). Second thoughts on Agieren: Listening to the enacted. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 95 (5), 967–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sapisochin, G. (2015). Playing: Listening to the enacted dimension of the analytic process. In G. Saragnano & C. Seulin (Eds.) “Playing and reality” revised. A new look at Winnicott’s classic work (pp. 45–62). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Saragnano, G. & Seulin, C. (2015). (Eds.) “Playing and reality” revised. A new look at Winnicott’s classic work. London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slavin, J. H. (1998). Influence and vulnerability in psychoanalytic supervision and treatment. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 15 (2), 230–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Speziale-Bagliacca, R. (2010). Come vi stavo dicendo. Nuove tecniche in psicoanalisi [As I was saying … New techniques in psychoanalysis]. Roma: Astrolabio.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vigna-Taglianti, M. (2015). Ruptures and reconnections: Play as a thread for sewing up? In G. Saragnano & C. Seulin (Eds.) “Playing and reality” revised. A new look at Winnicott’s classic work (pp 175–200). London: Karnac.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Winnicott, D. W. (1971). Playing and reality. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Borgogno.

Additional information

A version of this paper was presented at the 49 IPA Boston Congress, July 2015, in a Panel entitled “Working with transference and countertransference: Special learning moments in our psychoanalytic journey” and appeared in a modified form in the Revista de Psicoanálisis de la Asociación Psicoanalítica de Madrid and in the Rivista di Psicoanalisi. I thank the Madrid and the Italian reviews for having granted permission to republish it in English.

1Franco Borgogno, Ph.D. in Philosophy and in Psychology, is full professor of Clinical Psychology at the Psychology Faculty of Turin University (Italy); Full Member of the International Psychoanalytical Association and Training and Supervising Analyst of the Società Psicoanalitica Italiana.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borgogno, F. A SPECIAL LEARNING EXPERIENCE ABOUT TRANSFERENCE AND COUNTERTRANSFERENCE DYNAMICS AT THE BEGINNING OF MY PSYCHOANALYTIC TRAINING. Am J Psychoanal 76, 99–110 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2016.6

Download citation

Keywords

  • analytic supervision
  • dynamics of transference and countertransference
  • role-reversal
  • repetition
  • transformative factors