In his contribution to the 1956 Round Table Discussion, Silvano Arieti outlines some ideas that he considers effective in working with psychically fragmented patients. He speculates that the most effective tool in such a treatment is the creation of a certain atmosphere, based on the transference–countertransference relationship. In the spirit of this atmosphere, communication can be reestablished, genetic interpretations are linked together and the patient has the potential to recover his social self by rebuilding trust in the I-Thou relationship. Arieti also addresses the importance of the analyst’s faith in the actualization of the potentialities of the patient who is struggling with primitive mental processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Arieti, S. (1954). Some aspects of the psychopathology of schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 8, 396.
Arieti, S. (1955). Interpretation of schizophrenia. New York: Brunner.
Arieti, S. (1957). What is effective in the therapeutic process? American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 17, 30–33.
Arieti, S. (1959). American handbook of psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.
Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
Arieti, S. & Arieti, J.A. (1977). Love can be found: A guide to the most desired and most elusive emotion. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Arieti, S. (1979). The parnas: A scene from the holocaust. New York: Basic Books.
Bacciagaluppi, M. (forthcoming). Arieti and Bowlby: Convergence and direct influence. American Journal of Psychoanalysis forthcoming.
Balbuena Rivera, F. (forthcoming). The relevance of Silvano Arieti’work in the age of medication. American Journal of Psychoanalysis forthcoming.
Barbanel, J. (1981). Silvano Arieti, psychoanalyst and writer on Schizophrenia. New York Times, Obituaries. August 10, 1981. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/1981/08/10/obituaries/silvano-arieti-psychoanalyst-and-writer-on-schizophrenia.html.
Buber, M. (1953). I and Thou (R. E. Smith, Trans.). Edinburgh: Clark.
Eckardt, M.H. (2006). Celebrating the 50th anniversary of the American academy of psychoanalysis and dynamic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis, 34, 5–12.
Erikson, E. H. (1953). Growth and crises of the healthy personality. In C. Kluckhohn, H. A. Murray & D. M. Schneider (Eds.) Personality in nature, society and culture Pp. 185–225). New York: Knopf.
Ferenczi, S. (1926). Further contributions to the theory and technique of psychoanalysis. London: Hogarth Press.
Friedman, M.S. (1955). Martin Buber: The life of dialogue. London: Routledge Kegan Paul Ltd. and the University of Chicago Press.
Fromm-Reichmann, F. (1950). Principles of intensive psychotherapy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Horney, K. (1939). New ways in psychoanalysis. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Nunberg, H. (1948). In practice and theory of psychoanalysis a Collection of Essays New York: Nervous and Mental Disease Monographs, Vol. 74.
Slipp, S. (1999). From divergence to convergence in american psychoanalysis: The influence of freud’s background on the splitting of the psychoanalytic movement. Journal of the American Academy of Psychoanalysis and Psychiatry, 27, 503–514.
Sullivan, H. S. (1947). Conceptions of modern psychiatry. Washington, D.C.: William Alanson White Foundation.
Sullivan, H. S. (1953). The interpersonal theory of psychiatry. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Thompson, C. (1950). Psychoanalysis, evolution and development. New York: Hermitage.
Wexler, M. (1952). The structural problem in schizophrenia: The role of the internal object. In E.B. Brody & F.C. Redlich (Eds.) Psychotherapy with schizophrenics (pp. 89–111). New York: International University Press, Inc.
This article was originally presented at the Round Table Discussion, “What is effective in the therapeutic process?” at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychiatric Association in Chicago, Illinois on May 1, 1956. Panel was moderated by: Bella S. Van Bark, MD. Other presenters were: Elizabeth Kilpatrick, M.D., Lewis Wolberg, M.D., Marianne Horney Eckardt, M.D., Frederick A. Weiss, M.D., Leslie H. Farber, M.D. and Louis E. DeRosis, M.D. This article was first published in the American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 1957, 17:30–33, and is republished here.
1Silvano Arieti, M.D., (1914—1981) was a distinguished psychoanalyst, theoretician and psychiatrist, the author of important books and papers from the 1950's to the late 1970's. At the time of the Round Table Discussion in 1956 he was a Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry, State University College of Medicine at New York City and a Charter Member of American Academy of Psychoanalysis, founded in 1956.
About this article
Cite this article
Arieti, S. WHAT IS EFFECTIVE IN THE THERAPEUTIC PROCESS? A ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION. Am J Psychoanal 75, 217–223 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2015.5
- psychic fragmentation
- basic trust
- social self
- transference–countertransference relationship
- psychoanalytic treatment of psychosis