FREE TO MOVE, FREE TO BE

Abstract

The Hungarian Pikler-Lóczy Institute for Infants’ Well-being and Healthy Development could not have been created without the fundamental contribution of the Budapest School’s approach to Object Relations. For historical reasons, very little is known in psychoanalytical circles about this extraordinary experience and work. Pikler created an original model with a space for partnership, reciprocity, and the baby’s “true” autonomy, which focuses on the baby’s self-initiated motor development: “freedom to move”. The atmosphere of this world around babies can be related to the “rêveries” of Ferenczi about the necessity for an early, caring environment provided through adult tenderness as it appears in his Clinical Diary.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Lóczy, une maison pour grandir” is a film by Martino (2000—France, 170 min), where the director traces back the historical and cultural context in which this institution was born and shows the pedagogical approach in which it operates. Also see Martino’s (2001) book.

  2. 2.

    “Empathy” is here understood in the psychoanalytical way described by Stefano Bolognini in his book L’Empathie Psychanalytique (2006).

References

  1. Bick, E. (1964). Notes on infant observation in psychoanalytic training. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 45, 558–566.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bollas, C. (2011). The Christopher Bollas reader. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bolognini, S. (2006). L’empathie psychanalytique. [Psychoanalytical empathy]. Paris: Érès.

    Google Scholar 

  4. David, M. & Appell, G. (1968). Lóczy ou le maternage insolite. [Lóczy or the unusual mothering]. Paris: Edition Scarabée.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ferenczi, S. (1908). Psychanalyse et pédagogie [Psychoanalysis and education]. In L’enfant dans l’adulte [The child in the adult] (pp. 29–40). Paris: Payot & Rivages 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ferenczi, S. (1932 [1995]). The clinical diary of Sándor Ferenczi. J. Dupont (Ed.), M. Balint & N. Z. Jackson (Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988 (second printing, 1995).

  7. Golse, B. (2009). Le droit des bébés à disposer d’eux-mêmes [The right of self-ownership of babies]. Psychiatrie Française, 40 (4), 97–110.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Golse, B. (2010). Communication in the symposium “Infancy in Times of Transition” at the 12th World Congress of the World Association for Infant Mental Health, June 29–July 3, 2010, Leipzig.

  9. Haag, G. (1990). Identifications intracorporelles et capacités de séparation [Intracorporal identifications and capacities to separate]. Neuropsychiatrie de l’enfance et de l’adolescence, 38 (4–5), 245–248.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Haag, G. (1991). Nature de quelques identifications dans l’image du corps. Hypothèses [The nature of some identifications in the body image. Hypotheses]. Journal de la Psychanalyse de l’enfant, 10, 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Martino, B. (2000). Lóczy, une maison pour grandir. [Lóczy, a house in which to grow up] J.C. Lattes (Ed.). Documentary film by the Association Pikler-Lóczy-France.

  12. Martino, B. (2001). Les enfants de la colline des roses: Lóczy, une maison pour grandir. Paris: J. C. Lattès.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meltzer, D. (1978). A note on introjective processes. In A. Hahn (Ed.) Sincerity and other works: Collected papers of Donald Meltzer. London: Karnac, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Novick, K. K. & Novick, J. (2003). Two systems of self-regulation and the differential application of psychoanalytic technique. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 63 (1), 1–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pikler, E. (1984). Importance du mouvement dans le développement de la personne initiative- competence [The importance of movement in the development of the person: Initiative and competence]. La Médecine Infantile, 91 (3), 273–278.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Roussillon, R. (2002). Le transitionnel et l’indéterminé [The transitional and the indeterminate]. In B. Chouvier (Ed.) Les processus psychiques de la médiation (pp. 61–80). Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Szanto, A. (2012). Lóczy, un nouveau paradigme? L’Institut Pikler dans un miroir à facettes multiples [Lóczy, a new paradigm? The Pikler institute in a multi-faceted miror]. In Le fil rouge. Paris: Presse Universitaire de France.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tardos, A. (2008). Les soins corporels à la pouponnière de Lóczy de l’Institut Emmi Pikler [The bodycare in the residential nursery of Lóczy in the Pikler Institute]. In: M. David (Ed.) Le bébé, ses parents, leurs soignants (pp. 117–132). Paris: Érès Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Winnicottian, D. (1958). De la pédiatrie à la psychoanalyse [Through pediatrics to psycho-analysis. Collected papers]. Paris: Payot. N.Y.: Brunnel/Mazel 1992.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julianna Vamos.

Additional information

A version of this paper was presented at the “Sincerity and Freedom in Psychoanalysis” conference at the Freud Museum, October 2013.

1Julianna Vamos, Ph.D., Pychoanalyst at the Paris Psychoanalytic Society; Perinatalist at the Maternity Clinic: Les Bluets, Paris; Training psychologist for the French Pikler Lóczy Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vamos, J. FREE TO MOVE, FREE TO BE. Am J Psychoanal 75, 65–75 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2014.60

Download citation

Keywords

  • babies’ self-initiated motor development
  • true autonomy
  • initiative, gesture and language of tenderness
  • Emmi Pikler
  • Ferenczi