Abstract
The television series Mad Men is critically acclaimed despite grievous flaws as a drama. Its immense popularity is important psychological data and needs to be explored from the vantage of the dynamics of deception, including motivation, appeal and consequences for relationships and the self. The show's creator is inspired by John Cheever, the depth of whose complex characterizations is contrasted to the lures of the show. The parallel between the manipulations of authenticity inherent in advertising, the relationships between those who are involved in it and the relationship the show establishes with its audience is studied through two contiguous brief scenes that portray multiple reverberating deceits. These characters in these scenes are understood as creating both longing and disappointment at multiple levels. The psychic costs for both the deceivers, those deceived, as well as witnesses to the deception are fundamental.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheever, J. (1991). Bullet park. New York: Vintage.
Forster, E.M. (2008) “Some books” (Billy Budd). In M. Lago, L.K. Hughes & E.M. Walls (Eds.) The BBC talks of E.M. Forster, 1929–1960 (pp. 384–388). Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
Lewis, R.F.B. (1955). The American Adam: innocence, tragedy and tradition in the nineteenth century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Melville, H. (1998). Billy Budd. United States & Canada: Signet Classics, (Original work published in 1924).
Mendelsohn, D. (2011). The mad men account. New York Review of Books, February 24, Vol. 58, No. 3: pp. 4–8.
Weiner, M. (2007–2010). Mad Men [Television series]. United States: Cable Network AMC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
1Ph.D., ABPP, Co-Chair Interpersonal Track, New York University Postdoctoral Program in Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prince, R. Bodyguard of Lies: The Vicissitudes of Deception Among Mad Men and Women. Am J Psychoanal 71, 376–380 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2011.31
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/ajp.2011.31