URBAN DESIGN International

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 255–273 | Cite as

Perceptions and barriers to walking in the rural South of the United States: The influence of neighborhood built environment on pedestrian behaviors

Original Article

Abstract

This article examined the relationship between neighborhood built environment and pedestrian behaviors in the rural US South, a setting that has rarely been the focus of previous pedestrian behavior research. It used surveys administered to six neighborhoods in Starkville, Mississippi, a rural/small-town in the South, with a 38.5 per cent response rate and a total of 362 household participants. The study compared walking behavior between traditional neighborhoods built before WWII, early conventional suburban neighborhoods built around the 1970s and late conventional suburban neighborhoods built around the 1990s. The results indicated that aesthetics is the most important perceived neighborhood characteristic that encourages walking, but social environment as a perceived walking barrier discourages walking. Nevertheless, residents’ perceived neighborhood characteristics and neighborhood barriers, as well as their associations with walking differ across the three neighborhood types. This study provided insights into the neighborhood design features and their interplay with the social environment that affects walking in a rural/small-town context.

Keywords

neighborhood built environment pedestrian behavior rural/small-town 

References

  1. Alfonzo, M., Boarnet, M.G., Day, K., McMillan, T. and Anderson, C.L. (2008) The relationship of neighbourhood built environment features and adult parents’ walking. Journal of Urban Design 13 (1): 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bedimo-Rung, A.L., Mowen, A.J. and Cohen, D.A. (2005) The significance of parks to physical activity and public health: A conceptual model. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 28 (2): 159–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brownson, R.C. et al (2000) Promoting physical activity in rural communities: Walking trail access, use, and effects. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 18 (3): 235–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brownson, R.C. et al (2004) A community-based approach to promoting walking in rural areas. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27 (1): 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brownson, R.C. et al (2005) A multilevel ecological approach to promoting walking in rural communities. Preventive Medicine 41 (5–6): 837–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cao, X., Handy, S.L. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2006) The influence of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: Evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 33 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2006) Physical activity for everyone, www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpa/physical/importance/index.htm, accessed 9 March 2013.
  8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2011) Overweight and obesity – Economic consequences, www.cdc.gov/obesity/causes/economics.html, assessed 9 March 2013.
  9. Cervero, R. and Duncan, M. (2003) Walking, bicycling, and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco bay area. American Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1478–1483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chi, G., Porter, J.R., Cosby, A.G. and Levinson, D. (2013) The impact of gasoline price changes on traffic safety: A time geography explanation. Journal of Transport Geography 28 (1): 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cleland, V.J., Ball, K., King, A.C. and Crawford, D. (2012) Do the individual, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity differ between urban and rural women? Environment and Behavior 44 (3): 350–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corburn, J. (2004) Confronting the challenges in reconnecting urban planning and public health. American Journal of Public health 94 (4): 541–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Craig, C.L. et al (2003) International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Medical Science Sports Exercise 35 (8): 1381–1395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dannenberg, A.L. et al (2003) The impact of community design and land-use choices on public health: A scientific research agenda. American Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1500–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Deziel, C. (2013) How to calculate the floor space index of a particular property. SFGate, http://homeguides.sfgate.com/calculate-floor-space-index-particular-property- 39892.html, accessed 27 November 2013.Google Scholar
  16. Dill, J. (2004) Measuring network connectivity for bicycling and walking. Transportation Research Board 2004 Annual Meeting, http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/TRB2004-001550.pdf, accessed 27 November 2013.
  17. Downtown Design Guide (DDG). (2009) Downtown design guide: City of Los Angeles, http://urbandesignla.com/UD_pdf/Downtown_Design_Guide.pdf, accessed 27 November 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Eyler, A. (2003) A.personal, social, and environmental correlates of physical activity in rural Midwestern white women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 25 (3 Suppl 1): 86–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fogelholm, M. et al (2006) Rural-urban differences in health and health behavior: A baseline description of a community health-promotion programme for the elderly. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 34 (6): 632–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Foley, J.A. et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309 (5734): 570–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank, L.D., Andresen, M.A. and Schmid, T.L. (2004) Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27 (2): 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Frost, S.S. et al (2010) Effects of the built environment on physical activity of adults living in rural settings. American Journal of Health Promotion 24 (4): 267–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gebel, K., Bauman, A.E. and Petticrew, M. (2007) The physical environment and physical activity: A critical appraisal of review articles. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 32 (5): 361–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greater Starkville Development Partnership (GSDP). (2012) Workforce data, http://business.starkville.org/county-profile/workforce-statistics-oktibbeha-county/, accessed 11 April 2013.Google Scholar
  25. Handy, S., Cao, X. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2006) Self-selection in the relationship between the built environment and walking. Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (1): 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hendee, J.C. (1969) Rural-urban differences reflected in outdoor recreation participation. Conference paper presented at the annual meeting of the Rural Sociological Society, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  27. Humpel, N., Owen, N., Iverson, D., Leslie, E. and Bauman, A. (2004) Perceived environment attributes, residential location, and walking for particular purposes. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 26 (2): 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Humpel, N., Owen, N. and Leslie, E. (2002) Environmental factors associated with adults’ participation in physical activity: A review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22 (3): 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Joens-Matre, R.R., Welk, G.J., Calabro, M.A., Russell, D.W., Nicklay, E. and Hensley, L.D. (2008) Rural-urban differences in physical activity, physical fitness, and overweight prevalence of children. The Journal of Rural Health 24 (1): 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Johnstone and Associates. (2005) City of Starkville, Mississippi comprehensive plan: 2005–2030, http://www.cityofstarkville.org/DocumentCenter/View/810, accessed 11 April 2013.
  31. Kegler, M.C., Escoffery, C., Alcantara, I., Ballard, D. and Glanz, K. (2008) A qualitative examination of home and neighborhood environments for obesity prevention in rural adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 5: 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Khattak, A.J. and Rodriguez, D. (2005) Travel behavior in neo-traditional neighborhood developments: A case study in USA. Transportation Research Part A 39 (6): 481–500.Google Scholar
  33. Krizek, K.J. and Johnson, P.J. (2006) Proximity to trails and retail: Effects on urban cycling and walking. Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (1): 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Long, J.S. (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Majumdar, S. et al (2010) Alarmingly high prevalence of obesity in haemophilia in the state of Mississippi. Haemophilia 16 (3): 455–459.Google Scholar
  36. Mitlin, L. (1975) The historical development of land use in Starkville, Mississippi, A Small University City. Master’s thesis, Department of Geology and Geography, Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi.Google Scholar
  37. Norman, G.J. et al (2006) Community design and access to recreational facilities as correlates of adolescent physical activity and body-mass index. Journal of Physical Activity and Health 3 (Suppl 1): S118–S128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oka, M. (2011) Toward designing an environment to promote physical activity. Landscape Journal 30 (2): 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Owen, N., Humpel, N., Leslie, E., Bauman, A. and Sallis, J.F. (2004) Understanding environmental influences on walking: Review and research agenda. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 27 (1): 67–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F., Black, J.B. and Chen, D. (2003a) Neighborhood-based differences in physical activity: An environment scale evaluation. American Journal of Public Health 93 (9): 1552–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saelens, B.E., Sallis, J.F. and Frank, L.D. (2003b) Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: Findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 25 (2): 80–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanderson, B.K. et al (2003) Personal, social, and physical environmental correlates of physical activity in rural African-American women in Alabama. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 25 (3 Suppl 1): 30–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwanen, T. and Mokhtarian, P.L. (2005) What affects commute mode choice: Neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods? Journal of Transportation Geography 13: 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Starkville Central Neighborhood Foundation (SCNF) (2013) Historic sites, http://www.historicstarkville.org/, accessed 2 March 2013.Google Scholar
  45. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010a) Census block map: Starkville city, MS, http://www2.census.gov/geo/maps/dc10map/GUBlock/st28_ms/place/p2870240_starkville/DC10BLK_P2870240_000.pdf, accessed 4 November 2013.
  46. U.S. Census Bureau. (2010b) The 2010 U.S. Census. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  47. U.S. Census Bureau. (2013) State and county quickfacts, http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/28/2870240.html, accessed 4 November 2013.
  48. Vlahov, D. and Galea, S. (2002) Urbanization, urbanicity, and health. Journal of Urban Health 79 (4): S1–S12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vojnovic, I. (2006) Building communities to promote physical activity: A multi-scale geographical analysis. Human Geography 88 (1): 67–90.Google Scholar
  50. Wilcox, S., Castro, C., King, A.C., Housemann, R. and Brownson, R.C. (2000) Determinants of leisure time physical activity in rural compared with urban older and ethnically diverse women in the United States. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 54: 667–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woodward, C.V. (1993) The Burden of Southern History. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, Z., Zhang, L., Penman, A. and May, W. (2011) Using small-area estimation method to calculate county-level prevalence of obesity in Mississippi, 2007–2009. Preventive Chronic Disease 8 (4): A85.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Landscape ArchitectureMississippi State UniversityStarkvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Agricultural EconomicsSociology, and Education, Population Research Institute, and Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University ParkPAUSA

Personalised recommendations