Subjectivity

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 69–86 | Cite as

Interaction, discourse and the subject

  • William Housley
Original Article

Abstract

During the course of this paper, I examine the concepts of ‘discourse’ and the ‘subject’ in relation to social organization and action. The paper argues that these concepts represent a form of explanation that reduces the complexity of the social. Through a reconnection with processes relating to social organization and action, the paper argues that the current ‘deepening’ of subjectivity can be informed by sociological ideas. Indeed, the paper makes the claim that moves to develop the concept of subjectivity through ‘interiority’ and ‘relationality’ would benefit from a dialogue with interactionist ideas. The paper discusses three programmes of work that illustrate how subjectivity can be informed through a reconnection with interactionist sociology.

Keywords

subjectivity interaction people-processing degradation-ceremonies passing social organization 

References

  1. Appadurai, A. (1990) Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture and Society 7 (2): 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P., Delamont, S. and Housley, W. (2008) Contours of Culture: Complex Ethnography and the Ethnography of Complexity. New York: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, P. and Housley, W. (2003) Interactionism. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauman, Z. (1998) Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Z. (2002) Society Under Siege. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Z. (2003) Liquid Love. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, H. (1963) Outsiders. New York: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Blackman, L., Cromby, J., Hook, D., Papadopoulos, D. and Walkerdine, V. (2008) Creating subjectivities. Subjectivity 22: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Butler, J. (2006) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Castells, M. (1997) The Power of Identity. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Doubt, K. (2004) Evil and the Ritual of Shame: A Crime Against Humanity in Bosnia-Herzegovina, http://www.janushead.org/7-2/Doubt.pdf, accessed 27 November 2007.
  12. Ferguson, H. (1992) Watching the World Go Around: Atrium Culture and the Psychology of Shopping. In: R. Shields (ed.) Lifestyle Shopping: The Subject of Consumption. London: Routledge, pp. 34–35.Google Scholar
  13. Fevre, R. (2003) The New Sociology of Economic Behaviour. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  14. Garfinkel, H. (1956) Conditions for successful degradation ceremonies. American Journal of Sociology 61: 240–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
  17. Hoschild, A. (1983) The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Housley, W. (1999) Role as an interactional device and resource in multidisciplinary team meetings. Sociological Research Online 4 (3).Google Scholar
  19. Housley, W. (2000a) Story, narrative and teamwork. The Sociological Review 48 (3): 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Housley, W. (2000b) Category work and knowledgeability within multidisciplinary team meetings. TEXT 20 (1): 83–107.Google Scholar
  21. Housley, W. (2003) Interaction in Multidisciplinary Teams. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  22. Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2002) The reconsidered model of membership categorisation analysis. Qualitative 2 (1): 59–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2008) Beyond the discursive: The case of social organisation. A reply to Edwards, Hepburn and Potter. Qualitative Research 8 (4): 679–683.Google Scholar
  24. Housley, W. and Fitzgerald, R. (2009) Membership categorization, culture and norms in action. Discourse and Society 20 (3): forthcoming.Google Scholar
  25. Housley, W. and Smith, R. (2009) Mundane Reason and Passing in Urban Space. Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Working Papers.Google Scholar
  26. Housley, W. and Wahl-Jorgensen, K. (2008) Theorizing the democratic gaze: Visitors’ experiences of the New Welsh Assembly. Sociology 42 (4): 726–744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeffrey, R. (1979) Normal rubbish: Deviant patterns in casualty departments. Sociology of Health and Illness 1: 40–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kitsuse, J. (1962) Societal reaction to deviant behaviour: Problems of theory and methods. Social Problems 9: 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latimer, J. (1999) The dark at the bottom of the stairs: Performance and participation of hospitalized older people. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 13 (2): 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maines, D. (2001) The Faultline of Consciousness: A View of Interactionism in Sociology. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  31. Martinez, H. (2008) On psychology, work and the production of the subject: The case of the urban passenger transport system in Bogotá. PhD dissertation. Cardiff School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  32. Mead, H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Metcalfe, A. and Game, A. (2008) From the de-centred subject to relationality. Subjectivity 23: 188–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munro, R. (2004) Punctualizing identity: Time and the demanding relation. Sociology 38 (2): 293–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rapport, N. (2008) Working Paper 111: Everyone, the Human Actor: Recognising the Non-Indexical Individual. Cardiff School of Social Sciences, http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/research/publications/workingpapers/paper-111.html, accessed 26 November 2008.
  36. Rawls, A. (1987) The interaction order sui generis: Goffman's contribution to social theory. Sociological Theory 5 (2): 136–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rose, N. (1998) Inventing Ourselves: Psychology, Power and Personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Scott, S. (2004) Researching shyness: A contradiction in terms. Qualitative Research 4 (1): 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, R. (2009) The social actor in the landscape of regeneration? PhD dissertation. School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  40. Sudnow, D. (1965) Normal crimes. Social Problems 12: 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Urry, J. (2002) The Tourist Gaze, 2nd edn. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Walkerdine, V. (1990) Schoolgirl Fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  43. Walkerdine, V. (2006) Workers in the new economy: Transformation as border crossing. Ethos 34 (1): 10–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walkerdine, V. (2007) Children, Gender, Video Games. Basingstoke, UK and New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Willig, C. (2000) A discourse-dynamic approach to the study of subjectivity in health psychology. Theory & Psychology 10 (4): 547–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Housley
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Social Sciences, Cardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations