Subjectivity

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 340–355

On Waiting for Something to Happen

Original Article

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine two particular and peculiar practices in which the mediation of apparently direct encounters is made explicit and is systematically theorized: that of the psychoanalytic dialogue with its inward focus and private secluded setting, and that of theatre and live performance, with its public focus. Both these practices are concerned with ways in which “live encounters” impact on their participants, and hence with the conditions under which, and the processes whereby, the coming-together of human subjects results in recognizable personal or social change. Through the rudimentary analysis of two anecdotes, we aim to think these encounters together in a way that explores what each borrows from the other, the psychoanalytic in the theatrical, the theatrical in the psychoanalytic, figuring each practice as differently committed to what we call the “publication of liveness”. We argue that these “redundant” forms of human contact continue to provide respite from group acceptance of narcissistic failure in the post-democratic era through their offer of a practice of waiting.

Keywords

psychoanalysis performance ethics encounter anecdote waiting 

References

  1. Agamben, G. (1999). The Man Without Content. Georgia. Albert (trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Auslander, P. (1999). Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Badiou, A. (1982). Théorie du sujet. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  4. Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics: an Essay on the Understanding of Evil. Peter Hallward (trans.). London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Badiou, A. (2004). Theoretical Writings. In Albert Toscano and Ray Brassier (eds.) London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Baraitser, L. and Frosh, S. (2007). Affect and Encounter in Psychoanalysis. Critical Psychology 21, pp. 76–93.Google Scholar
  7. Bass, A. (2007). When the Frame Doesn't Fit the Picture. Psychoanalytic Dialogues 17 (1), pp. 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond Doer and Done To: An Intersubjective View of Thirdness. Psychoanalytic Quarterly LXXIII, pp. 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourriaud, N. (2002). Relational Aesthetics. S. Pleasance and F. Woods (trans.). Paris: Les Presses Du Réel.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, K. (2006). Auslander's Robot. International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media 2 (1), pp. 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chvasta, M. (2005). Remembering Praxis: Performance in the Digital Age. Text and Performance Quarterly 25 (2), pp. 156–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. (1987). Dialogues. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Fenske, M. (2005). The Aesthetic of the Unfinished: Ethics and Performance. Text and Performance Quarterly 24, pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frosh, S. (2002). Key Concepts in Psychoanalysis. London: British Library.Google Scholar
  15. Gallop, J. (2002). Anecdotal Theory. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gillespie, S. (2006). Giving form to its Own Existence: Anxiety and the Subject of Truth. Cosmos and History: The Journal of Natural and Social Philosophy 2 (1–2), pp. 161–185 [WWW document]. http://www.cosmosandhistory.org/index.php/journal/issue/view/9 (accessed 22 April 2008).Google Scholar
  17. Kester, G. (2004). Conversation Pieces: Community and Conversation in Modern Art. San Francisco, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Laplanche, J. (1998). Essays on Otherness. John Fletcher (trans.). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Latour, B. and Weibel, P. (eds) (2005). Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Levinas, E. (1974). Otherwise than Being, or, Beyond Essence. Alphonso Lingis (trans.), 1998 paperback edition. Pittsburgh: Dusquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Levinas, E. (1978). Existence and Existents. Alphonso Lingis (trans.). The Hague: Nijhoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lingis, A. (2000). Dangerous Emotions. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  23. Malone, K. (2005). Erasing the Impossible Professions: The State and Psychoanalysis. Unpublished conference paper, International Society for Theoretical Psychology Conference, Cape Town, 2005.Google Scholar
  24. McNeill, W. and McNeill, J.R. (2003). The Human Web: A Bird's Eye View of History. New York: W.W.Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  25. Nairn, T. (2007). The Enabling Boundary. London Review of Books 29 (20), pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
  26. Nixon, M. (2005). On the Couch. October 113, pp. 39–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nobus, D. and Quinn, M. (2005). Knowing Nothing, Staying Stupid: Elements for a Psychoanalytic Epistemology. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Phelan, P. (1993). Unmarked: A Politics of Performance. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Phillips, A. (1995). Terrors and Experts. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  30. Rancière, J. (1999). Dis-Agreement: Politics and Philosophy. J. Rose (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  31. Safe, E. (2002). Come into My Parlour. The Guardian, 25 May 2002.Google Scholar
  32. Samuels, R. (2001). An Academic is Being Beaten: A Psychoanalytic Discussion of Higher Education. Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society 6 (2), pp. 167–171.Google Scholar
  33. Sloterdijk, P. (2005). Atmospheric Politics, in Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Unger, R. (2006). What Should the Left Propose? London: Verso.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Roehampton UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations